Wabc AM hypocrisy

 I would blame that pompous windbagJoan Hamburg for her rant against Curtis but she is only among the offenders at WABC am, that totally betrayed the trust of the conservatives

Joan of course is this gaseous piece of crap that rants about how many famous people she knows every week and we have to put up with it rather than legitimate conservative views 

She went on a rant against Curtis because Curtis would not give in to the general feeling at WABC that he should not run for mayor and allow that corrupt womanizer Cuomo to get his votes 
She implied that Cuomo lost because of Curtis and also that's a general population did not like Cuomo when in fact Cuomo health kill senior citizens and then wrote a book about how good he did and dealing with covid
Joan of course is constantly telling us about how many famous people she's known over the years and had made love to and we have to listen to her as if she is somebody important 
But in fact WABC am totally screwed conservatives this week, a hypocritical move to get Cuomo elected even though Cuomo has been charged with Missuse of women, the sending of seniors to their deaths in nursing homes as well as promoting abwoke agenda that includes anti-policing, bail reform and other anti-conservative items
Up until this election WABC hated Cuomo and said all of these disparaging things about his administration but suddenly he's the Savior when Curtis is the only legitimate candidate who actually stood up for conservative values 
This of makes you really suspicious about what WABC is really about and whether the owner who is a prominent grocery store owner is really worried about the new mayors agenda of providing free supermarket food to people and not really about conservative values 
The fact that they are all largely windbags like Joan only she's at least honest enough to be completely obnoxious where is the others pretend like this is some sort of noble experiment that we ought to jump on the bandwagon like they did 
Joan has been a prominent columnist for the New York Post for years which makes you wonder about the post agenda  putting up with someone who actually turned in people for not wearing masks or covid 
In the end of the day Curtis is the only one who stood up and said what was right that Cuomo was not a good candidate and that the Cuomo votes should have come to Curtis rather than the other way around 
But WABC and Joan have crucified Curtis instead, making him out to be a villain when in fact WABC and its hosts were totally hypocritical completely reversed their loyalties and betrayed conservatism 
Joan is basically a pompous self-centered gas bag that spews her crap on the air once a week on Sundays and this week attacked Curtis for his cats even though curtis' wife was a prominent rescuer
Joan sang the praises of Cuomo who helped kill people in nursing homes and did other atrocities and then bragged about it 
What is wrong with WABC and can it be trusted in the future to truly represent conservatism when it is so willingly giving it's self over to really obnoxious and perhaps outrageously corrupt people like Como 

The end of the world as we know it April 11, 2025

 

It’s the end of the world as we know it, or maybe want it, this insane wish-fulfillment we constantly seek in order that we won’t grow old and die alone.

No nuclear disaster this time, at least, not yet, but more subtle, we breathe too deeply, expelling fumes that will cause the seat to rise and so promise we will drown or meet fate through some storm inspired by cow farts, and back-firing carbon-fueled vehicles, chicken little scenarios we get every so often when headlines read we have a mere ten years until it’s too late to stop it, each prediction coming and going without the demise of the planet, these doomsayers who promise, but don’t believer, and frankly, I’m disappointed, wanting for the next prediction to come true, knowing it my heart it never will, despite all of the brain dead children who believe otherwise.

 

 

email to Al Sullivan

Harrison Ford academy award for scumbag of the year

 It appears that Harrison Ford is now in the running to get the academy award for the biggest scumbag in Hollywood

Prior to this I thought Tom Hanks and Bruce Springsteen were of that caliber but Harrison's recent spouting of crap about Trump has put him far ahead of the pack 
I would have considered George Clooney for this but I never saw any talent in him for anything other than his selfish self-centered egotistic spouting on everything 
Hank's and Clooney of course have been funding terrorist organizations like antifa and so they are clearly scumbags to begin with but I was surprised by Harrison Ford who has adopted his role as hans solo thinking he is fighting the Darth Vader character when he is really Shadow boxing 
But to tell you the truth Springsteen Harrison Ford Tom Hanks and Clooney don't really help anybody except terrorists they don't feed people on the street they don't help with homelessness they don't house illegal immigrants they don't do anything but spout 
And since Harrison Ford's last few movies have been totaled bombs you have to really consider him for the academy award and imagine what he might say when he gets up on stage to accept it 
I didn't think he really would qualify because he is such a lesser talent than all of the others in the running I mean I thought he was a decent human being but it turns out he's just another woke idiot 
Hanks should have won this award because he is perhaps the most selfish self-centered of all of the Hollywood people and pretends like he isn't 
But I might be wrong Harrison Ford might qualify as the most pretentious of them but we shall see when the academy awards come around and the nominees are read 
After all Harrison Ford did not get a medal of freedom from Obama the way Hanks did which maybe makes him deserving to get this scumbag of the Year award 

email to Al Sullivan

Jimmy Kimmel as terminator

 Jimmy Kimmel is back like a scene from a bad horror movie in which you can't drive a stake deep enough into the heart to end the movie and so you have to put up with the monster resurrecting itself again and again and again

We all hoped that this man would be contrite but that would not be Jimmy Kimmel iwhose whole life is determined to be a monster at heart someone who is so deeply mean-spirited that he can't find any sympathy for him in any respect and so have to put up with him as being the horror that he really is 

You know all those scenes from the original Terminator in which no matter what you do to save yourself this beast keeps coming after you and it is such a relentless attack that you begin to understand just why people have come to secretly hate this man and fear him because they don't want him turning on them 

Even Jay Leno who was totally screwed over by Kimmel says positive things to avoid being the target of this monster's wrath 

Unlike Hollywood movie however Disney which is almost as monstrous as he is is willing to reinstate him maybe because like the fictional computer network they secretly want him to succeed in their effort to take over and control the world 

Like Terminator there's something inhuman about kimmell something that doesn't have a heart or a soul but just this killer instinct that keeps him coming and coming and nothing will stop him short of a nuclear blast 

In the end of course in a real movie the good guys win but this is not a good guy movie and this is the villain bit in which the villain wins after all 

So don't expect Terminator Kimmel to step off the stage anytime soon he's been reinvigorated has a new computer part in his little brain that tells him that he can keep on doing nasty and despicable things and he will always have the approval of somebody in management who will want to make money over morality 

But don't worry kimmel is a self-destructing little robot and what he does now will be even worse than what he did before because he can't help himself he's programmed to be a mean spirited evil little SOB

King Charles doesn’t care

  

The United Kingdon and Canada decided to recognize the non-existent nation of Palestine, or at least some version they have created in their collective minds.

They may be suffering from collective guilt since they were the same nations that helped create Palestine in the first place, only back then, after the conclusion of World War I, Palestine was a Jewish state, created out of the ruins of Ottoman Empire. Later, when the Arabs sided with the Nazis to help exterminate the Jews in the 1930s and 1940s, it was the United Kingdom that led the charge to create modern day Israel – which is nothing more than renamed Palestine.

The West Bank, the Golen Heights and Gaza – out of which the United Kingdom intends to create the new and artificial Palestine – actually belonged to Syria, Jordan and Egypt, until those countries waged war against Israel, and Israel won. Isreal kept trying to give Gaza back to the Arabs, but every time, it became a launching pad for attacks on Israel – the October 7 event the last in a long series of outrages.

UK and Canada seem to have fallen prey to a corrupt United Nations, whose reports of events in Gaza are so full of factual error you can’t trust them (nearly all of it Hamas propaganda.

This idea of fact verse fiction has never stopped the English from acting.

Hitler was right when he believed the United Kingdom had more in common with the Nazis than it appeared on the surface, a fact that is only now becoming clear with this latest attempt to undo the history UK created in the first place.

This is not to say King Charles is stupid or even misinformed. But English royalty was always a more than little bit arrogant (after all, UK invented the whole concept of white supremacy, which may be why they are bending over backwards to appease terrorists – in much the same way Chamberland did the Nazis.

While ignorant kids on college campuses in our neck of woods might be deluded into believing the phony reports of starvation in Gaza (Hamas hijacking food shipments may well but true), but King Charles clearly knows better and is still steering his country into a new Holocaust against the Jews.

In this, you have to wonder what the English hope to gain, when they are knowingly acting to create a state that has no right to exist, at the expense of a state (Israel) that the UK helped create in the first place.

Is this the UK version of white guilt? Does King Charles feel responsible for the hatch job the British did after World War I when they ignored tribal lines to create phony states and almost guaranteed bloodshed?

Or does King Charles – like his ancient predecessor King George – think he has the right to dictate the fate of nations, when he can’t even dictate the fate of his own pathetic Royal family?

We already know that Canada is UK’s lapdog, a socialist state that follows behind whatever gets said in the UK, with an almost brainless prime minister, who hate America (at least the America that has emerged under Trump)

Still King Charles must know what’s really going on in the middle east and has decided to act as if doesn’t, dragging Canada into the mix.

What does King Charles gain by siding with terrorists? Does he really think peace will come as a result of giving terrorists even more land to attack Israel from? Is King Charles so ignorant of history as to ignore all those other attempts by Arabs to kill Jews?

My guess is King Charles doesn’t care.

 

email to Al Sullivan

Kimmel to do reboot of the Three Stooges

 

Insider reports claim that Jimmy Kimmel – who has been axed from his late night show thanks to his utterly insensitive remarks concerning the death of Charlie Kirk – is in negotiation to get reinstated.

Not only that, this contract could possibly reemploy Steven Colbert and Fallon, even nutty Seth Meyers in a reboot of some Three Stooges classics.

The network was concerned as to whether Kimmel play the role of Moe, and was he sadistic enough to physically abuse him fellow comedians the way he has verbally abused anyone associated with the Republican Party.

But a review of his previous shows demonstrated Kimmel far exceeded the other two comedians in this regard.

Colbert apparently objected to giving the role of Moe to Kimmel and suggested they toss a coin, until someone pointed out that there are three comedians and a coin only has two sides.

Jon Stewart, never one to miss an opportunity to get attention, agreed to play the role of Shemp, if the network wished to have the program include four stooges and not just three, though network officials seemed to think Stewart lacked talent to play the role of any stooge. Most experts agree – with the exception of Jay Leno, who seems to be kissing the others’ asses – none of the four have been funny in the past, and hope that by beating the crap out of each other, they will gets some chuckles from members of the GOP, who would clearly find that entertaining.

Just to be on the safe side, network officials are expected to bring back the old Vaudeville hook, to drag one or more of the trio if and when they go off script and start ranting and raving about Charlie Kirk again, an unlikely scenario considering how contrite Kimmel became after savaging Kirk the first time.

Still, these three (or four if you count Stewart) are perfectly capable of screwing up a good thing, always desperate to make some kind of political statement rather than actually being funny. Despite their rise to power on late night TV, none of these people have talent or ethics to make their political diarrhea sound funny, unlike Charlie Chaplin, in whose shadow none of these three can compare.

Rumors or not, would any network dare to take a chance with these mental giants? Can they be trusted to do slapstick after so many years of lame political jokes.

Of course, there remains the question of how the heirs of the original Three Stooges might feel seeing such pathetic characters parodying the really great comic acts of the past. They could sue to keep the network from allowing such low-life characters like these to play those roles.

If things don’t work out for Kimmel and company, he and they might take up a profession they are truly adept at: Trash collection. After all these year dolling out the crap they call comedy, those three certainly would know what trash sounds like.

 

email to Al Sullivan

Jon Stewart lost his pacifier

 

Jon Stewart is pissed off that nobody has told him to shut up.

So, like a petulant little brat, he’s having a tantrum, telling the world he won’t shut up, on the off chance anyone thinks he’s important enough to bother with.

Steward is clearly upset that other comedians are banned from airwaves for saying stupid things, and so Stewart needs to say stupid things to keep up with them.

He’s the spoil brat at kids’ birthday party that needs to act out in order to get attention, the way he did several years ago when he launched a phony crusade for veterans nobody has heard of since.

In order to get in on the show, this week Stewart came out with a statement saying he would not be censored

Nobody tried to but he felt so ignored by The in crowd that he decided he was going to hold a temper tantrum anyway

This is a kid who obviously when an infant kept having a pacifier shoved in his mouth to keep the crap from coming out

These days, however, he hasn't made any headlines, so he had to make some headlines for himself

The fact is we're better off hearing what comes out of his mouth since it is almost verbatim of some democratic think tank in which has paid his salary for years

But be cautious when it comes to Stewart he will go out of his way to spoil the party unless he’s the center of attention.

You can't hold it against him since he was among the least funny of all of the late-night comedians. He’s a gnat in a world of dinosaurs.

Unfortunately, he's too big to spank

email to Al Sullivan

Kimmel went too far this time

  

Jimmy Kimmel is not stupid; but he thinks his audience is.

Or perhaps, the problem goes far deeper than just stupidity, an arrogance that is extremely Orwellian.

He is so used to manipulating people for so long, selling them false narratives that when it comes to alleged shooter of Charlie Kirk, Kimmel actually believed he could convince the public that black is white – even though the preponderance of evidence showed that the person charged with the crime was deeply involved with the trans community and had distinct left wing leanings.

Kimmel was determined to reshape this character into a Maga stooge, then the alleged killer was a woke stooge instead.

Kimmel has been selling the false woke agenda for so long, he couldn’t possibly stand the idea that someone associated with his political opinion would shoot someone, and so needed to convince the public otherwise.

It’s hard to tell if Kimmel is deluded or this was a deliberate attempt to do what Orwell said all oppressive regimes engage in, misinformation, even when the public has access to the truth.

Kimmel seems to believe he had some magical power to convince people not to believe their own eyes, and rely on him for truth. Stalin would have loved Kimmel, only Kimmel proved too inept to make it work.

But it shows just how indoctrinated in his own woke philosophy Kimmel has become.

A normal person would have painted the would-be killer as just another whacko and moved on, but Kimmel became obsessed with proving things otherwise, and foolishly believed in his god-like ability to dictate a lie as truth.

This has massive implications for the agenda he and others in media have been selling since before Trump’s first term began. If Kimmel lied about this, you have to question what else he and others in media have been lying about – most likely everything, and this threatens to unravel as well orchestrated media campaign against Trump and the GOP, and may well open the eyes of many people who have up to this point taken Kimmel’s misinformation as gospel.

Kimmel can’t help himself. His rage against the GOP won’t allow him to stop and his personal belief that people will accept whatever he says as truth will prevent him from ever coming to grips with his anti-trump disease.

Disney, which is no friend of Trump or the GOP, realized how dangerous Kimmel was to the anti-trump movement and yanked Kimmel off the air before he could do any more damage, not out of any sense of shame for Kimmel having danced on Kirk’s grave.

 

email to Al Sullivan

Banning Christians

  

It is very difficult to tell what the motivation is Abdullah H. Hammoud is in his recent banning of a Christian from his meeting.

It is possible that Hammoud is auditioning to become the new world leader of Hamas and can’t tell the difference between a Christian and Jew.

Or Hammoud may be aching for the glory days of Islam when the Christian Crusades unraveled in the Middle East many long centuries ago.

But clearly the mayor the mayor forgot which country he is elected to and forgets that tolerating descent is what he gets paid for, to listen to his constituents whether he likes them or not.

 To be fair to the Muslim mayor it could be worse he could actually be in Gaza working against the Jews and Christians there

In the United States, there are certain constraints although when you look at what happened to Charlie Kirk, you begin to think maybe mayors like Hammoud would do away with them in order to silence people who have opinions other than their own.

You have to love a country in which people of all faiths can embrace each other in civility, although it may not be wise to allow the mayor access to a rifle of any kind or for that matter, anything thing sharp like an Arabian sword.

Hammoud, however, has decided he is the arbiter of right and wrong, good and evil and is decided that this Christian doesn't deserve to have a voice in his community, thus exposing his own prejudices when it comes to opinions spouted by Christian and Jews – not a bit leap from Nazi Germany which also denied these people a voice.

The worst part is that Hammoud is likely to get reelected since he seems to reflect ill feelings by many of his constituents, who wish not to tolerate people seen as inferior.

Does Hammoud’s dictate go beyond just public meetings, but all of the community events? Will the mayor set up separate bathrooms for Christians and water fountains and will he make Christians sit on the back of buses.

Will Hammoud ban Christians and maybe jews from local lunch counters?

And what other rights will this good mayor curtail in order to uphold his position of power This is not to say he should tolerate misbehavior at the council meetings but certainly he gets paid to hear the complaints and obviously doesn't want to hear it from anybody other than his own group of narrow-minded people

At the end of the day, we are seeing these Petty dictators popping up all over the country, little tyrants who have forgotten why they came to the United States in the first place and what freedom means in regard to other people besides themselves.

Someone needs to wake Hammoud up and remind him where he is or buy him a one-way ticket to Gaza where his kind of behavior is tolerated.

email to Al Sullivan

UnAmerican activities as defined by Jason Crow

 

 Jason Crow, a congressman from the super woke state of Colorado, said it is unAmerican to punish people for cheering on the murder of Charlie Kirk.

This clearly influential Democrat makes a sound case for people who believe killing someone who we disagree with is legitimate.

Crow, no doubt, would not be bothered if people back in June 2020 cheered on the equally horrendous murder of George Floyd. Of course, using this logic, Crow obviously believes that people should not be punished for showing support for the murder of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., John F. Kennedy or his brother, Robert Kennedy.

In this regard, Crow should be crafting legislation to help protect all murderers from unreasonable criticism by anyone, and no doubt, Crow would generously support killers of any kind, killing anyone, as long as those people being murdered happened to be people he personally disagrees with politically.

This may explain why Crow and his democratic cronies do their utmost to make sure criminals get released back on the street, giving them a second chance to repeat their crimes.

Crow most likely would approve of those who cheer on criminals during street crimes. How dare anyone prevent these good citizens from exerting their constitutional right of free speech, even when this means supporting murderers.

Nobody should ever be punished – as long as the victim of the crime is someone Crow disapproves of.

Did we hear peep from Crow when mean spirited people claimed Floyd deserved to die?

Would Crow have protected nasty people who supported Oswald or any of the classic killers of the 1960s.

Crow thinks it’s a person’s right to support such killers.

If only Crow was consistent in his praise of those who praise murder, and would support all the people who cheer on mass murderers. But it is clear, Crow is only supporting those who cheer on the murder of a conservative. But it would clearly be a different case if Crow heard someone cheering on the murder of Floyd.

But it if is unAmerican to punish those who support the murder of Kirk, then it is unAmerican for anyone who supported the murder of MLK.

Is that really what Crow is telling us?

email to Al Sullivan

Selling Freddy's soul

 

You have to admire just how great and Noble a tradition ministers have been playing in local politics.

Unfortunately, these are people who seek to model themselves after Dr. Martin Luther King, yet for some reason can’t quite get the knack.

Many claim to be holy, and yet somehow took a misstep in their path to personal enlightenment, and seem to be reliving the age of Crusades, full of fire and brimstone, that makes them sound drunk rather than religious.

One local minister took it on herself to go to the deep south to help pull down statues of confederate soldiers, an obvious cause inspired by God, only when she got there she managed to aggravate people she mislabeled as white supremacists, and returned home like a war hero claiming she slay them with her mighty spear.

Most of her kind (she happens to be a white liberal) wouldn’t know a white supremist if one fell on her head, but that doesn’t stop her since she is clearly being guided by God.

Another minister forced her way into a pride event in the town where she grew up and shouted loud enough with the hopes her conventionally religious mother might hear her, and I’m still trying to find out what part of scripture she got this bit of revenge from.

Down south in Texas, we have Rev. Freddy, who is responsible for one of the worst and most racist congress people on earth (if you believe a black woman who hates white people can be considered racists).

Freddy has it in his head he is a reincarnation of MLK and is particularly enraged when people compare the white conservative Charlie Kirk to MLK instead.

Freddy doesn’t say it out right but clearly thinks Kirk – who is white – is the wrong color, so keeps calling Kirk “a fake Christian.”

Obviously, Freddy missed the part of MLK’s speeches that talked about the quality of character rather than color of skin.

Freddy has decided he’s taken up the role of God and can look into Kirk’s soul, passing judgement on a man, whose speeches have aroused support even among those who oppose Kirk politically.

Freddy doesn’t have that problem. Every time he spouts his crap, he largely alienates people he has been commanded by God to save, obviously believing people with black skins are more worthy than people with white skins, and so rants and raves until he turns blue in the face.

If only MLK was alive to hear him, but then MLK might have more in common than Freddy does, lacking the basic requirement to become a minister these days: hate of white people.

This is a scary thought for anyone approaching the pearly gates and finding someone like Freddy waiting with a paint chart from Shermin Williams to determine if the soul is dark enough to qualify for admittance to heaven.

But rest assured, this won’t be a problem. If Freddy is the guard of any gate it will be the gates of hell, a job for which he is best suited.

I’m not saying that had Freddy been invited to the last supper Christ would have to worry about Freddy getting his share of the pieces of silver, but it is clear that while Freddy claims to be modeling his life after Christ, he may have missed a few chapters in the good book and mistaken the role of serpent instead, perhaps thinking Adam and Eve were just too damned white to be enjoying Eden.

Don’t mistake me. Freddy doesn’t mean to be evil, he just ends up that way, clearly forgetting his role as a good shepherd to guide souls to Christ rather than drive them the other way.

The whole idea of “forgiveness,” Freddy twists into “for blacks only,” and so condemns Kirk’s soul (after all Kirk was murdered) to eternal damnation rather than finding space in his own heart to maybe suggest Kirk as misguided.

No, instead, Freddy goes into a jealous rage against a white man who better exemplifies Christ and MLK than Freddy ever could, and maybe this is the problem.

Instead of thinking he can look into another man’s soul and believe he has the right to pass judgment, Freddy should look into his own soul and deal with the blackness there, not the good blackness of a skin color, but the color of corruption that only sympathy with the devil brings.

 

email to Al Sullivan

Hollywood stars boycott Jews

  

It appears that the movie stars that have decided to boycott Jewish movie production.

This may be a significant hardship for these actors, who get top dollar to portray imagery people.

Acting jobs may be hard to come by and many may be forced to do remakes of Nazi propaganda films

This is a practical solution since they will still be able to live up to their pro terrorist philosophies, resorting the historical period to which they are most sympathetic.

At first, it will be difficult for these antisemitic actors to perform in films that depict contemporary events. The terrorists, who these actors seem to support, may not allow them to film on location because the terrorists (who kill Jews) may not be able to rely on these movie stars remaining as deaf, dumb and blind if they actually see what is going on in the middle east, rather than relying on skewed reporting and hateful information from the United Nations.

These unfortunate movie stars, who have kept blindfolds on for so long is difficult to say how they will be able to make a living.

But at first, doing films depicting the Holocaust from a pro Nazi point of view might keep them from ever discovering the truth, while maintaining their anti Semitic status in the Woke community.

Phoenix and other major stars clearly have decided that they want to support a noble cause even if they don't quite know what that cause is

Over time, of course if the terrorists have their way, these movie stars could get better material than just that of the massive slaughter of Jews in the 1930s and 40s and may eventually do a film on October 7^th -- from the terrorist point of view, naturally,  showing how noble the terrorists are in raping murdering and kidnapping people

That unfortunately is still far down the road since they will need to get funding from some other source other than Iran and other terrorist Nations who have been spreading misinformation

Funding for such atrocious movies may be available through the United Nations which is nearly as def dumb and blind as the movie stars are

Competition for lead roles in Nazi historic films will be fierce since many of these well-meaning movie stars will want to get top billing playing the role of Adolph Hitler.

Maybe they can start their own studio where they may duplicate some of the slaughter that Hitler was responsible for

Movie stars can easily duplicate all of the upper ranking of the Nazi regime since they are sympathetic to that cause but as we move on to films about the October 7th and the increased attacks on Israel, they may have to resort to DEI to make sure that the roles are authentic and that these mostly white movie stars are not stealing roles from terrorists who may do the rules better than they can

Ultimately of course considering how corrupt the academy has become there may be a whole litany of anti-Jewish Oscars that such Stars can win for their dedication to antisemitism

You'll have to question who will present such awards and what the categories might be: best actor for playing the role of those Nazis or terrorists who kill the most Jews, and technical awards roles as lampshade makers

Such awards could be divided into historic documentation of supporting Hitler youth as opposed to the current terrorist groups that are being celebrated

But that is too far to speculative at this point

Since obviously these movie stars really Kow nothing about what's going on in the Middle East and really need to catch up on facts but as long as they rely on terrorist information sources and the United Nations they may forever be in the dark

email to Al Sullivan

Charlie Kirk as martyr September 13, 2025

 

 It becomes very obvious by the radical woke people who are bashing Charlie Kirk most either never actually listened to what he had to say or found him so convincing they have gone into deep denial, and resort to use of words like Racism or White Supremacy to counter his huge influence on previously brainwashed college students.

Kirk was never a racist or a white supremist, but with the deaf, dumb and blind supposedly educated on college campuses, this doesn’t matter.

Trying to remember, it is our best and brightest who have been molded into the Marxist doctrine where truth is what you say it is, and often during Kirk’s college campaigns, he unmasked many of his most vocal critics, sometimes even making them realize that the professors (those so call messengers of knowledge on campus) have mislead them, and perhaps are utterly convinced of their own moral superiority, they can’t come to grips with the truth when brought right into their back yard.

The fact that Kirk was a Christian also seems to offend the college establishment, including so called ministers who have been celebrating Kirk’s murder in much the way the Pharisees must have the crucifixion of Christ.

While most ministers are well-meaning, even when mistaken, there are a batch of them who are so full of hate it boils out of them with every breath, holy people who are not holy, and disguise their hatred with scripture they are completely ignorant about, often siding with those who do not believe in God over people like Kirk, who did.

Kirk’s death has exposed just how vicious a crowd the woke people have become, wannabe murders, too cowardly to perform the vicious act themselves so like Judas take their 30 pieces of silver and encourage with their lecturers more mentally unstable people to perform the act in themselves.

Mainstream media is equally guilty, broadcasting lies, and then hateful speeches that get under the skin of maniacs who then commit the act while media, college professors and others pretend they had no culpability in the violence, although some have just enough courage to claim the victim (in this case Kirk) deserved to be murdered, simply because his opinioned differed from theirs and he was extremely effective in selling it to the naïve population media and colleges previously assumed they had effectively brainwashed with wokeness.

Some institutions have back tracked, even fired teachers and broadcasters who too openly cheered on the murder. How different this was in the case of George Floyd when because of skin color, media and schools could paint into a Christ-like figure, despite his criminal record.

Kirk was white and so became an easy target for the establishment, provided the rhetoric doesn’t go so far as to put their own institutions in jeopardy or expose the truth about their false truths.

Kirk was too effective in demonstrating just how these institutions of higher learning and established media had brainwashed kids and was also effective at opening these kids’ eyes to that fact, something that made Kirk extremely dangerous.

Did the woke establishment seek to silence Kirk?  Indeed, in some school districts, clubs based on his teachings were actually banned, even though their counterparts on the left were encouraged. But to kill him outright is a fatal mistaken, just as it was when the Greeks killed Socrates and the Pharisees killed Christ. They did the worst possible thing, they made Kirk a martyr, and the more we get radical broadcasters and professors saying Kirk deserved to die, the more of a martyr Kirk becomes.

His death is symbolic, and as with Dr. Martin Luther King, shows just how horrible those forces are that are stacked against him. Of all the stupid mistakes Democrats have made (including democratic congress people shouting down any moment of silence in Kirk’s honor) the worse it all becomes. It shows just how mean spirited the Democrats really are. The curtain has been drawn open. The Wizard’s dirty tricks have been exposed. They can’t undo the truth, as hard as they might try.

email to Al Sullivan

How to be an idiot at George Washington University

 

The reason remarks by Pohorilak an assistant l administrator show how it is still possible to have a college position and still be blatantly stupid 

The unfortunate assistant May the remark that jolly Kirk largely got what he deserved because Kurt believed in guns 

The fact is that Kurt believed that people killed people and he was right whereas this idiot from George Washington University keeps missing the point 

If you are pro-gun therefore you deserve to die is what George Washington University is largely saying 

Whereas Kirk and the GOP are seeing that fanatics who own guns are going to kill people no matter what their ideolog

Banning guns isn't the answer what is the answer is curbing the rhetoric by colleges and media that inspires these wackos to go out and kill people 

But then George Washington University and other universities like it are part of an agenda setting that promotes crime and belittles victims such as Kirk 

This is not to say that all University graduates end up stupid like this administrator or death dumb and blind like most of those who are anti-kirk it just shows that for all of their college education they don't actually listen to what other people say 

And George Washington University shows just how miseducated their students are not being taught how to think or evaluate but how to be brain dead and to listen only to what they want to hear and what they are taught by radical idiots like this assistant administrator 

Of course at the end of the day something has to be done to stop these people from killing people and unfortunately the left and the universities and these other places throw up their hands and don't take responsibility for their rhetoric and so now can pretend like they are innocent of the crime when they are actually the people who caused it in the first place 

Killing Kirk was not just a tragedy it was one of the stupidest things the left could have done far worse than the George Floyd is situation which AOC keeps ranting about 

This was a legitimately intelligent human being making intelligent arguments on campuses that were having an effect of breaking down the brainwashing that universities have been doing to young people 

This is the real reason why George Washington University and this idiot assistant administrator have to dispel any kind of respect for Kirk 

To admit that he had a legitimate argument is to admit that possibly what they are teaching kids in these universities is damaging and dangerous and largely inspiring violence 

Bring us back to that old argument guns do not kill people the people who pull the triggers do and if you inspire them and if you teach them hate the way George Washington University teaches their students and you don't allow them to think and reason arguments the way this assistant clearly does not want then you're going to have a lot of idiots pulling triggers idiots unfortunately with University degrees who are still idiots and still dangerous

 

email to Al Sullivan

CDC head won't leave

  

In a power play between the president and the CDC, the director has decided to ignore the directive by Trump to leave her office

This is a woman who was part of the orchestration of the biggest political and perhaps scariest self created pandemic in the history of America and possibly since the great black plague

A lot of people compare the covid pandemic to the 1918 pandemic that killed many more people

The big difference is this was a virus that was created in a laboratory and conveniently released to the public in time for the 2020 election – a virus paid for and developed by people associated with the CDC.

And now 5 years later there seems to be more and more evidence that it may have been deliberately done to help the Democrats win the election

The CDC has been working hand in hand with Democrats too destroy Trump back then or at least to bring down the economy

Even the numbers are questionable well nearly a million people died, the CDC figures are really suspect since many of those people were dying from something else and happened to catch the virus. If a sick person died of cancer for instance and tested positive for COVID, he or she was listed as a COVID death.

And if that wasn't enough to help destroy the economy the governors of democrat-controlled states deliberately sent sick people to nursing homes perhaps to boost the numbers so as to justify the panic that they caused

CDC recommendations for keeping distance from other people and wearing masks indoors and outdoors seemed a bit overkill since the mass or proven not to be effective during the 1918 pandemic

And it seems that in States run by the GOP that allowed people to be outdoor gatherings the rate of infection was much lower than those in liberal states who were forced to be in prison in their own homes due to CDC recommendations

The fact that the director for the CDC has held on to her post for so long is testimony to the fact that she helped the Democratic nominee for president when and this may have been pay back

What is suspicious is the fact that the covid pandemic did not really have a greater impact than previous pandemics such as the 1969 flu epidemic which lasted about 3 years and killed a greater percentage of the population. The COVID numbers were skewed by deaths from other causes it is hard to tell just how bad the pandemic in 2020 was

Certainly the numbers were boosted and distorted and an awful lot of covid money went to odd things that had nothing to do with health

Biggest beneficiary was big pharma which got to manufacture a vaccine that may actually have killed as many people or created other damage as covid did and yet allowed these major companies to get rich quick off the misery of other people

Now that there's a conservative office she is refusing to leave even though it is clear that she is either incompetent or corrupt

 

email to Al Sullivan

The terrorists lied is no surprise March 29, 2025

  

They lied; we’re not surprised, except by the fact someone, hour best and brightest out of our most expensive universities, believed them in the first place, our idiotic youth who take to the streets to protest on behalf of murderers and rapists who claim they are the real victims.

How could anyone be so smart and still be so stupid after all the capital spent by their parents to send them to the best universities (where they get their miseducation completed by vicious mean-spirited professors even more deluded than these kids are., the brain-dead zombies who rant and rave but ignore the murder and rape, just as they ignored the black-masked radicals that burn down city after city in the false sense of social justice, these thumb-sucking morons telling us about genocide, when they do not even know what the word means and must rely on the propaganda of the New York Times to tell them, yet accuse the Jews of something they know nothing about, like a pack of lab rats injected with some brain-altering elixir that recreates the real world to better suit the hallucinations and for some ungodly reason we tolerate their stupidity.

 

 

email to Al Sullivan

Send in the social justice clowns March 28, 2025

 

To be hip you got to be sick in the head – like the movie stars are, to be a member of a club so full of hate they hate anyone who thinks other than the way they do.

None of this is new, each new generation gets this deluded avant-garde too self-centered to even reinvent the wheel, plotting to take over the planet and force their hateful views down the throats of people who have more common sense than they do, and if we resist, we get called Nazis or racists or worse, we, struggling to force this abusive social justice beast back into the hole out of which it slithered, yet unable to put a final end to it, just to temporarily quell its voracious appetite long enough to give us room to breathe.

It always returns like the last scene in some cult horror movie and we are forced to do it all over again, lacking any knight to slay this dragon, only to put it back again and again, only to have it emerge generation after generation spouting failed concepts rather than flames, people who not only have forgotten their history, but who insist on repeating these like idiotic buffoons.

email to Al Sullivan

Tesla March 27, 2025

 

They desecrate cars they once claimed to love, the way they burn cities, like frustrated two-year-olds going into a non-stop tantrum, unable to think or act or even pretend to act like they adults they claim to be, when they can’t get their own way.

They hate the cars they used to love because they hate the man who believes differently than they do, an will burn anything that defies their vision of a perfect world in which they get to dictate to other people on what to eat, breathe, think, going so far as to support thieves, liars, rapists and killers, going into a rage like an infant with a diaper rash, screaming as they burn the cars they used to love because the man they would burn at the stake is out of reach, these mass murders of the mind, so horribly full of rage.

email to Al Sullivan

An upper west side man March 26, 2025

 

I can’t believe he believes what he says he does, this man who still holds Woodword in high regard (when nobody else does), reads the pages of the New York Times more religiously than Bible-thumpers he despises read the Bible, a bitter man consumed with his rage against his conservative upbringing, who hates ordinary working people with dirt under their fingernails, or even those who work long hours at unworthy jobs so as to pay the mortgage on crumbling homes they pay too much in taxes to maintain, the son of a son of a working man, too ashamed to live the working life his father did, needing to rise above the ordinary muck, painting himself as an upper west side liberal and a life style he can’t afford to live, hating the common man for having more common sense that he does, too elite for his own good.

email to Al Sullivan

October 7 March 25, 2025

  

In his mind, it never happened that dark day in October, at least, his kind refuse to talk about it, only what happened later, the press he loves hunkered down with terrorists in hospitals and schools, shielded by the innocent they claim the Jews knowingly killed, denying them the right to strike back.

He refuses to believe those people would use their own kids or crippled as cover for their murders, his logic painting only good and bad guys in this mix, and insisting the jews are killing without cause, painting terrorists as heroes, even though he’s refrained from waving the terrorists’ flag, saying all this often enough, getting all this from skewed Jew-hating sources like the New York Times until it all makes sense. He didn’t kill anyone, rape anyone, hold anyone hostage in his house, and yet, he’s as much to blame, he just can’t see it.

 

email to Al Sullivan

From river to the sea Marc 24, 2025

  

He says he doesn’t hate jews, but garners his opinions from those who do, dismissing the rapes and murders, the torture and abductions these terrorists employed, while claiming jews were to blame, brainwashing naïve children miles away by pretending terrorists are saints, only he is too old to pretend he is among the ignorant masses, and by default throws his lot in with the rapists who claim to be victims when they are not, icons to an ideology that would reinvent the Holocaust, so he can become a member of the cool cult that defines itself as tolerant, perfectly willing to praise those who would drive Jews out from River to the Sea, willing to turn a blind eye to the atrocities these people commit or worse, to accuse Jews of atrocities that never happened, getting his opinions out of the pages of the antisemitic New York Times and National Public Radio, which he relies on for facts when they have become largely fiction, dancing in his remote way with the terrorists who dance on the graves of jews they’ve killed, all the time claiming he doesn’t hate Jews when all those who inform him do.

email to Al Sullivan

Fool on the hill March 23, 2025

 

He aches even all this time later, isolated in a little world he chose for himself, missing her, I suppose, along with the rest of humanity he professes to despise, perpetually bitter at how life has turned out, even when it has become exactly what he expected, the brass ring, hollow, when he assumed it would be made of gold, this fool on a hill whose life has become a string of predictions, each as hollow as the last. Living in a haze of dreams he assumed would come true, scribbling in his notebook or tapping on his tablet the fictions he saw, but have faded into dust like old typed pages fading un the intensity of sunlight, legible, but barely

 

email to Al Sullivan

Do you know what Jew is? July 11, 2025

 

The antisemitic crowd that has taken over many American universities apparently can’t distinguish between an Israeli and an ordinary Jew.

While the antisemitic rabble rouser on the Columbia University campus and the leading candidate for to became mayor of New York City may well know the difference, they may well be deliberately blurring the difference to promote hatred for all Jews everywhere

The young impressionable kids who seemed to have latched onto the teachings of these radicals, seem as naïve as the young Germans from the 1920s and 1930s who embraced the Nazi beliefs that ultimately led to the Holocaust.

Like many gullible Germans from the Nazi era, the young radicals of today are basing almost all their beliefs of propaganda being churned out of Gaza – for the express purpose to creating a new Nazi-like antisemitic movement worldwide.

The confusion about what is actually transpiring in the Middle East is not exclusive to the liberal mob in the United States.  Even some of the terrorists who attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, failed to distinguish between Israelis and ordinary Jews, and so raped, murdered and kidnapped many Jewish activists who were sympathetic to their cause.

The big difference between the New York liberal and a Gaza terrorists is that the terrorists in Gaza is actually on the ground and often has come nose to nose with Israelis, while the New York liberal has to vent his or her rage on the ordinary Jew – who has little to do with the alleged genocide the terrorists claim is being conducted against the Palestinians.

Yet, you can’t blame the well-meaning liberal since he or she gets most of his or her misinformation from well-crafted propaganda being pumped out by Gaza terrorists. Even officials at the United Nations and the often-deluded journalist from mainstream elite media take the word of the terrorists as gospel, further feeding the illusion that Israel is engaged in genocide against the Palestinians, when this could not be further from the truth.

Few if any of these campus radical warriors have actually gone to Gaza or Israel or Palestine to see for themselves what transpires there, so do not see the extraordinary efforts Israel had taken to protect the civilians in Gaza the terrorists there are using as human shields.

Don’t try to tell any of these campus radicals this.  In their view (the liberal mob), all that comes out of Israel must be a lie, while these radicals praise the noble efforts of Gaza warriors that raped, kidnapped and murdered people. To those campus radicals, the terrorists always tell the truth, which is why Associated Press, The New York Times and other “reliable” media rely almost exclusively on the terrorists’ version of events.

The liberal inability to distinguish between Israeli and ordinary Jew raises the question as to just how sincere these campus windbags actually are when they claim Israel is engaged in genocide (most off these radicals not even aware of what genocide is), and so abuse even murder ordinary Jews (as if – like the Nazis – these radicals used any excuse to attack Jew) in retaliation for the genocide the terrorists claim Israel is inflicting on Palestinians.

Part of the blame for this must be put on the antisemitic United Nations that deliberately redefined what genocide is in order to accuse Israel of atrocities. This may be less about what actually transpires in the Middle East than an effort by the United Nations to promote hatred of Jews worldwide – as did the Nazis who blamed Jews for ever ill in the world.

Overeducation and still misinformed campus radicals (who wave the terrorists’ flag in protest) fail to see just how similar their actions are to the Nazis of the 1020s and 1930s.

You can’t blame these kids, who have been indoctrinated by radical professors much the way young people were by the Nazis, looking apparently not just to blame Israel but all Jews, when most likely these kids don’t even know a Jew, let alone an Israeli.

It is no accident that the Gaza terrorists (and their media and United Nations) are blurring the line between Israeli and ordinary Jew,

Gaza terrorists along with many Palestinian radicals in the Middle East want young people to hate all jews and are creating the fiction of a Palestinian genocide to help pump up that hate.

The real genocide is still against Jews, not Palestinians, but overeducated and braindead campus radicals are too ignorant to see this, and perhaps down deep they also believe the way many Germans did in the Nazi era, hating Jews simply for being Jews.

 

email to Al Sullivan

Radical chic in New York City July 8, 2025

 

  

I’m beginning to realize how my grandparents must have felt, watching the world rapidly changing before their eyes.

Not just the altered world due to changing technology, but the ground swell of misinformed ideology that led to the rise of the Fascism and the Soviet State, often espoused by otherwise well-meaning people who mistakenly believe they can alter basic human nature and somehow force people to be fair in a world where fairness doesn’t exist.

Then, like now, such movements require scapegoats, someone or some group that these so-called progressives must blame for the ills of the world – back then, the robber barons who built the nation on the spine of railroads, and now, the oil cartels that keep the engines of the world operating.

Ironically, the antisemitism we thought long dead has been resurrected by a new generation, threatening to bring back the horrors of the Holocaust.

Mainstream media such as The New York Times, the Washington Post and those horrible bigots at MSNBC seem to be complicit in this charade, reverting to the Orwellian concept of propaganda that tells us white is black, good is evil, and such, often relying for their information on the same terrorists who murder and rape Israelis, and then play the role of victim when the Israelis strike back.

We get streams of video feed showing hungry Palistinian children starving, while kept in the dark about the terrorists who use them as human shields, leaving the usual do-gooders to moan and groan about how hateful Israelis are, and reformatting the concept of Genocide to use as a label on all Jews.

We have a radical mayor in Los Angeles with ties to former domestic terrorists allowing the more violent of these so-called do-gooders burn down what is left of that west coast city (after the mayor played Nero and fiddled while wild fires consumed the rest).

Now, it is New York City’s turn to elect a radical mayor, someone so full of hate even the Democrats are fearful he might actually get elected – much in the way those who supported a Democratic Germany were fearful at Hitler’s rise to power.

This is not an exaggeration. Los Angels, Boston, Philadelphia and other urban centers are embracing a hateful ideology while claiming it is not.

Young people, brainwashed in colleges such as Columbia and Harvard, appear to be embracing this race-based hate in much the way Hitler Youth did a century ago.

While I am tempted to tell them to elect this racist to further damage a city nearly brought to its needs by former Mayor De Blazio, history tells me that if we let this radical rise to power, we might not be able to stop him later as more and more foolhardy and ignorant young people flock to his hateful banner.

More terrifying is the idea that these young people are so thoroughly brain dead that they really do want to elect someone like this, the way Germans embraced Hitler and allowed him to perform all the atrocities he engaged in, and not merely against Jews.

As others have pointed out before me, when they came for those people, we did nothing, and then there was nobody left to help us when they came for us.

email to Al Sullivan