Monday, May 5, 2025

First concentration camp in America? May 5, 2025

 

The good news is that Donald Trump does not intend to challenge the U.S. Constitution and run for a third term as president.

The bad news is that Trump intends to reopen Alcatraz which many liberals will see as an American concentration camp.

This last is a kind of wish-fulfilment by Democrats who have used the courts to block exporting of illegal immigrants who have been charged with serious crimes and immigrant rights groups forcing local jails to give up their contracts with ICE to house illegal immigrants.

The more I study the rise of Nazi’s in Europe in 1920s and 1930s, the more similarities I see between Hitler and Trump, which may simply be ironies of history, but also may be the impact of the left in giving Trump fewer choices.

One of these ironies were averted when Trump decided to pull back on his plan to rename Veteran’s Day. Hitler had tried to do the same thing when he became Chancelor of Germany in 1933 – in an attempt to alter the public perception that Germany had lost World War I. Perhaps someone in the Trump administration also noticed the similarity and encouraged Trump to abandon his plans.

Unfortunately, Trump’s decision to without federal funds from NPR and PBS reeks of Nazi-like censorship, as does his attempt to without funds from antisemitic universities like Harvard and Columbia. While these institutions should not be using federal tax dollars to promote hate, his defunding them gives the liberals more ammunition to use against him – including pathetic congress people who are calling for yet another attempt to impeach him.

Arresting that hateful anti-Israel character at Columbia satisfied a deep urge many of us had when listening to his hate speech, this, too, gave Trump’s enemies fodder to attack him with. As much as an asshole as that character is, we still live in a nation of free speech (although universities like Columbia and Harvard do not recognize free speech of conservatives).

But beyond all these, the historic similarities between Trump and Hitler are disturbing. Both sought to make their respective countries “great again.” Both gained power to some extent based on their opposition to diversity. As Trump makes moves to remove many of the illegal immigrants Biden and the Democrats allowed to flood over the borders, his methods strongly resemble those of Nazi storm troopers and evoke the fearful images of what happened in Europe more than 80 years ago. The fact that Trump’s actions in securing the borders are extremely popular with many Americans is still more terrifying, since a majority of Germans approved of his activities back then.

Equally ironic is that the more roadblocks Democrats use to keep Trump from deporting the nearly 20 million illegal immigrants, the more likely the Trump administration will be forced to resort to drastic measures such as reopening old jails or shipping these illegal immigrants to private jails throughout the country – more concentration camps.

Another disturbing similarity between Trump and Hitler was Trump’s recent proposal that congress people accused of crimes be removed from office. Hitler had used a similar pretext to gain a voting majority in Germany’s version on Congress.

The left is constantly looking for ways to reconfigure Trump as a Nazi, even going so far as to compare Trump supporters (maga) as the equivalent of brown shirts, and to equate the Jan. 6 protestors as part of an insurrection.

What disturbs the left the most is that Trump, having been in office just over 100 days, has begun a serious purge in government and military to remove those who oppose his agenda, again reflecting some of the moves Hitler made.

But unlike Hitler, Trump is doing these things legally, even if some liberal judges claim otherwise, and as long as he remains on the right side of the law, his actions will only confound the Democrats, who are trying to stop him from dismantling institutions that have been ripping off public tax dollars for years.

Yes, Trump has reversed a number of agreements that Biden and Obama forged, such as removing the United States from the crippling and silly climate change regulations, and restoring sanctions of counties like Iran, who have used oil to support terrorists, especially against Israel. Trump is cutting to the bone those agreements that turned America into a get rich quick scheme for China.

Whether all this looks to liberals like moves a Nazi might make, let them live in their fantasy land. But Trump needs to not feed this frenzy by taking actions that too strongly resemble the worst in human history.

 

 


email to Al Sullivan

 

Thursday, May 1, 2025

Is Trump another Hitler?

  

A series of elections in Germany in 1932 pitted an incumbent senile general against the upstart leader of an emergency conservative party. Because the liberty Democrats that were trying to maintain the existing system relied on this old man and later, a replacement who was seen as a national joke, Germany eventually elected Hitler as its leader.

While contemporary American Democrats are trying to paint Donald Trump as the next Hitler (in particularly trying to tie him to a radical conservative document called Project 2025, a think tank piece he has disavowed and no more extreme than many of the Democratic think tank documents), history seems to be repeating itself.

Regardless of the Democratic mental illness that has liberals trying to make out Trump as the reincarnation of Hitler, there are significant even disturbing similarities between the two men and the movements they launched.

The most obvious of these is their major message: Hitler wanted to make Germany great again and used similar language as Trump’s MAGA, which raised the same reaction of Hitler’s swastika. Both symbols were banned early on.

The rise of both political figures can be divided into two segments: Hitler to the Beer Garden insurrection and his final accension into power. It is easy for Woke democrats to paint Trumps rise in similar phase, his first term as president (full of back stabbing by trusted associates, lies and false accusations by his enemies, and overall pollical mistakes including the Jan. 6 event which Democrats did their best to paint into an insurrection, as if deliberate promoting the comparison with the notorious German leader.

But there is a legitimate comparison to be made. The Beer Garden insurrection sent Hitler to jail, where he contemplated his return to power (most of which later appeared in his two volume My Struggles) outlining his resurrection.

Trump cast out of office had four years to plot out his own, and like Hitler, decided to beat his opponents at their own game at the ballot box. Like Hitler, Trump began to build a shadow government (officials he would put into power once he became president again) sop that like Hitler had his government up and running within weeks.

Trump’s distrust of media, universities and government bureaucracy mirror’s Hitlers, and indeed, his verbal attacks on judges who oppose his agenda is a bit disconcerting (one judge was even arrested).

Trump’s opposition of DEI allows Woke Democrats to claim he is racist like Hitler’s hatred of Jews and others was, even though DEI is largely discrimination and might well have been better challenged in the courts.

Nothing seems more Fascist than Trump’s use of ICE to round up and deport people, a bit too reminiscent of the Nazi rounding up Jews and other so called undesirables, and while ICE currently is rounding up criminals, Hitler proved the definition of criminal can easily be expanded to include almost anyone opposed to his agenda.

Trump used illegal immigration as a platform for his reelection much in the way Hitler used the public fear of communism and misconceptions about Jewish people to pave his way to power.

Both men took advantage of the economy. Massive inflation and later the Great Depression allowed Hitler to convince the public to support the Nazi Party (although he also used significant behind the scenes nastiness to get over the final hurdle), while Trump took advantage of the massive inflation Democrats had causes during Biden’s term in office.

Both Hitler and Trump seemed obsessed with expanding the land mass of the countries they were elected to lead. Hitler eyed Eastern Europe including Poland to reconnect the pieces of the once great German empire. Trump has already indicated he would like to annex Canada and Greenland.

Trump like Hitler seeks to rebuild the military and like Hitler, has begun a purge of military leaders he does not trust.

Like Hitler, Trump has also sought to get rid of government people he believes won’t be loyal to his agenda, and has already secured control over all levels of federal government, scaring the death of a Democrats who are desperate to use “liberal” judges to derail an agenda they can’t stop through legislative means.

Trump like Hitler distrusts academia, which is largely infused with a woke mentality, and is defunding these as well as government funded media, and other organizations such as USAID he believes supports a woke philosophy.

Like Hitler, Trump is rebuilding government from the ground up, and his attempt to removed liberal judges and replacing them with conservatives bodes ill for the disorganized Democrats.

The opposition in Germany was so fractured, they could not stop Hitler’s rise to power – and in some ways may be held accountable for allowing it to happen, just as Democrats are today.

Each dishonest attack on Trump makes him stronger, partly because by lying and cheating, my making up myths about Trump, accusing him of crimes he did not commit, they allow the public to see him as more and more credible as a leader.

Democrats claim Trump will destroy Democracy, failing to note how close Democrats came to doing so under Biden, but were too incompetent to do so, and now, can no longer do so, leaving them to create the fiction the Trump is another Hitler, and perhaps in their twisted little minds, he seems so.

 

 


email to Al Sullivan

 

 

 

Wednesday, April 2, 2025

Hating jews is what it means to be woke March 30, 2025

 


 

I can't believe how easy it is for liberals to slip into antisemitism

Was particularly enlightening when I spoke with a former worker someone who I once believed had come in since but clearly has drunk the woke Kool-Aid

The worst part is his adopting the antisemitic rhetoric of the extreme left claiming Israel attacks on terrorism as genocide

He of course aches to be an upper west side liberal only in our day and age to become a member of that exclusive club you have to hate Israel and thus the Jews

He thinks he is well informed when he gets his rhetoric from almost exclusive anti-trump anti GOP anti-Israel sites

He thinks he's being objective when he promotes through two State solution and claims that Israel does have a right to exist but not at the expense of the Palestinians

But there is no such thing as a two-state solution because the Palestinians and their surrogates hate Jews so much that they want Israel to cease to exist and this will never cease

The fact is there was a two-state solution, and the Israel gave up Gaza several times only to have the radical left wacko terrorists use this as a platform for a tax on Israe

My friend of course seems not to acknowledge the attacks on October 7th that included murder and rape and kidnapping by terrorists sometimes even kidnapping and rape of people who are sympathetic to their cause

My friend based on his information from New York times and other skewed sites seems to be completely ignorant of Israel history or the Palestinian state as he is promoted which is an artificial creation by the British after world war I when they simply divided up the Ottoman empire into artificial pieces

By that time the Jews were already in Israel along with a handful of Christians and the Palestinians as they're called were part of groups of wandering tribes that were supposed to be taking care of by other Arabs but the fact that they are too radical for other Arabs to even want in their countries

My friend of course has bought the woke agenda when it comes to Israel and will never budge from that and the client making claims about the Democratic ministration being pro-Israel when it was not, and such nonsense is that

I long suspected that he was not legitimately objective, but the conversation made me realize just how over the top even so-called moderate Democrats are when it comes to being anti-Semitic

A very big tragedy since this is history repeating itself


email to Al Sullivan

Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Democrats are only in it for the money

 It becomes more and more evident that Democrats needed to steal the 2020 election (as predicted by my essay on how the Russians ought to have stolen the 2016 election) in order to get their greedy hands on federal dollars, in what may be the biggest rip off of American taxpayers in history.

The scary part of what is being uncovered as far as fraud is that it is far, far worse than we even expected

The Democrats have ripped off the American people so massively it is shocking that the justice department isn't issuing warrants for arrest at this moment

We knew from the two major bills that Biden pushed through Congress during his questionable four years that Democrats and media and other fun people on the woke side were getting paid off handsomely, we just didn't realize how institutionalized the rip off was and how long it's been going on

This has been perhaps the biggest robbery of American people in history and Democrats seem to want to stay on the gravy train even as the country goes broke

This explains why people like George Soros and other big money people were shoving money into the Democratic coffers for each election; they were getting their payoff down at the other end where very few people could see.

But if you think this is purely a ripoff and typical Democratic greed, you're wrong

P:laying in this scenario is the Marxist ideology of bringing down the American government by making it an affordable – expanding entitlement programs to the point where the county can no longer afford to pay the massive debt these incure.

The concept is to saddle people with so much debt that that they eventually rise up and overthrow the kind of government we have for something more resembling Stalin.

No wonder everybody is squealing and they're using the course to try to slow down the investigation into just how deep this goes and how corrupt the people in charge of our finances really are

This is not to say that there aren't well-meaning people in the mix but those who are ripping off the government aren't well meaning they are simply greedy or have a political agenda that is not American

As the investigation into this rip off continues, many of those benefiting most from the rip off will rise up not as a Marxist society but as Urban or local terrorist groups try to retake the money train before it all vanishes

Climate change of course has been one of the big ripoffs even if that phony Mayor Bloomberg funds it with his own cash it is still just a money pit going to select people who are scamming people with snake oil

Experiments on animals should which should have PETA up in arms seems to have skipped over all of those would be animal lovers when it comes to taking back the money that went to these things

Anti-Israel rappers being paid for the United States and other questionable activities overseas more than highlights just how fast the cash has been flowing out and how everybody on the woke agenda seems to want to get their piece of the action

How this all will be stopped is questionable, since Democrats have been sucking blood from the American taxpayer for so long, they seem to believe they deserve it. They are not going to let the GOP take these privileges away from them without a fight, even resorting to the extreme measures they attempted against Trump prior to the election last November.

 

 


email to Al Sullivan

Friday, November 22, 2024

Nixon was innocent

 As it turns out Nixon never really had to resign because there was no crime.

The alleged Gap in the taping in his office was apparently accidental after all and did not contain anything of substance despite media's playing it up as if they were

While the so cold smoking gun piece of tape was misinterpreted by Nixon's lawyers, it turns out that he was not talking about the cover-up of the Watergate break-in but asking the CIA too talk to the FBI about protecting Democratic donors who had been giving money to his campaign

The fact that some of this money wound up in the pockets of those who actually did the break-in raised a lot of questions at the time but clearly showed that someone overseeing them use that money inappropriately

Dirty tricks of course have been common going back to the 1930s and used equally among Democrats and Republicans

This includes break-ins to campaign headquarters and bugging.

For instance  Kennedy and others associated with the Kennedys authorized wiretaps illegal on Nixon during the 1960 campaign, again the California campaign in 62, and later during the 1968 campaign they booked his airplane

The watergate commission that looked into the Watergate break-in was not allowed to look into the wider aspects and so it seemed like an isolated incident

Even Bernstein made it clear that the Watergate break in was rather insignificant and made significant only because the president was forced to resign

Although Bernstein and Woodward tried to imply and actually published material claiming that there was a wider campaign against Democrats recent documentation show this was not true and was perhaps misguided at best

A lot of what Woodward used came from a anonymous source called deep throat who turned out to be the deputy director of the FBI Mark felt

Woodward had an agreement with felt to never use him as a source. never mentioned the FBI and not reveal his identity all of which Woodward betrayed from the very first article he did for the Washington Post

Of course, authors defending felt making seem to be a saint when he was hardly that

Felt authorized illegal wiretaps and warrantless searches on whether underground facilities for which The Washington Post later wanted him prosecuted, a strange situation since felt was responsible for the success of the Washington Post and Woodward

I have several personal connections to the Watergate scandal.

Felt let the search for one of the survivors of the East village explosion who I hid out in my apartment for a few months until the FBI stop looking for him

I did not know that felt would eventually become deepthroat

Years later I would work for the son of Elliot Richardson who was fired by Nixon for refusing to fire the Kennedy connected prosecutor Cox – who Bork fired because Cox was in bed with the democrats and apparently held secret meetings with the judge and others overseeing the cst.

Still later after 9:11 I got to interview Alexander Hague who denied being deep throat but by which time it was clear felt was

The book All the President's Men turned out to be almost complete fiction at least from one perspective in that it violated every journalistic ethic and yet became the model for investigative reporting ever since

Woodward and Washington Post in order to take advantage of revealing deep throat actually did a bunch of hit pieces on him and his family in order to discredit him

Woodward eventually plagiarized felt’s book when finally writing a book about deepthroat

Following along trail of questionable journalism as he tried to recreate his perceived god-like Watergate status

A lot of this becomes very obvious now after all of the failed attempts to bring down Trump with fake crimes including those of January 6th so-called insurrection and his paying off of a pornstar.

It is no accident that John Dean who's inconsistent testimony in Watergate was never questioned when he implicated Nixon in the cover up which Nixon probably was not guilty of it all

As noted by several authors Nixon was in fact against cover-ups and lying saying that they both did more damage than good

Nearly all of the lawyers associated with Watergate were connected to the Kennedys and the effort by media including Washington Post to get Ted Kennedy elected president and to bring down Nixon

This is very similar to contemporary times where most of the judges and lawyers involved in the scandals against Trump are connected to Obama who is taking the place of Ted Kennedy as perhaps the most unethical politician in America

Woodward could never get back his Glory Days even coming after Trump, partly because many people suspect that his unnamed sources and other activities in follow-up books were either dishonest or slanted in an unethical way

The problem is that John Dean became the principal witness against Nixon and like many of those who turned on Trump Dean did what he did in order to escape punishment.

In a game of corruption if you can give up somebody higher than you in the food chain you get off Scot free which is what happened to Dean even though much of his information may be dishonest and self-serving

Fortunately, Trump was stronger than Nixon in that he fought tooth and nail against the distortion being promoted by The Washington Post, the New York Times and other legacy Media and ultimately people in the public got to see just how corrupt the Democrats were although everybody still seems to think Nixon and Watergate were legitimate when they were just another version of Russia gate

At the end of the day hopefully historians will look back on Nixon and vindicate him for a crime he did not commit and hopefully the next batch of attacks from The Washington Post New York Times and the Democrats will not have the believability that the lies told against Nixon did

Over the last 8 years we have heard over and over how what Trump did was worse than Watergate.  I do agree it was worse than Watergate but not because Trump did it but because legacy Media and people like Woodward were doing the same kind of dirty work they did back then only magnifying it.

Hopefully, the mythology of Watergate the lies and distortions will fade as our generation dies out and becomes something like Tippecanoe or some other silly political of the great past

And hopefully the historians will look at Woodward as the kind of phony he is just a stooge for the Kennedys at the time along with his editor

Unfortunately, there are no good guys in any of these stories even though some people are painted as saints when they're not


email to Al Sullivan

Saturday, November 16, 2024

Watergate redux

 

From the moment Trump declared his candidacy for president in 2015, Democrats tried to recreate their successful attempt to bring down a siting president.

The Watergate scandal became and remains the model they are using, and we expect will be resurrected again once Trump is sworn in as president for the second time.

This is partly why we saw Woodward and other ghosts from Watergate resurrected over the last year to reprise their roles and to firmly cement the idea in the public’s mind that Trump is another Nixon, who needs to be brought down.

Woodward has been celebrated as the greatest investigative journalist of all time, even though it appears that he was merely a tool for the Democrats to unseat Nixon. His role again Trump has been far less effective, partly because a number of people in media have come to question the validity of and the motives behind his activities in regards to Watergate.

Some people believe that Woodward operated with the intention of helping then Senator Ted Kennedy to become president (which fortunately never happened) since it was Kennedy and his team of lawyers that led the committees investigating Watergate (Ted recused himself to avoid public scrutiny of his own misdeeds).

Deep Throat, Woodward’s best source (a deputy FBI director as we later learned) helped propel him to near sainthood and the Washington Post into the most influential paper in the country, even though there were strong editorial ties to the Kennedy family, suggesting collusion.

All this might have gone to naught had not another major player stepped into the mix, providing congress with the legal justification to draft articles of impeachment against Nixon  -- which forced him to resign – even though the legal ruling used was criticized by constitutional scholars.

Hillary Clinton – not yet married to Bill Clinton – argued that a president could be impeached for small crimes, rather than the previously presumed major crimes scholars argued as necessary. She later reversed her position when her husband, Bill, faced impeachment.

Yet, her position on this helps explain why she helped create the Russian Collusion scandal (her campaign paying for a fictious document called the Steele Dossier which created the illusion of a serious crime against Trump needed to justify yet another impeachment. It also explains why the New York Attorney General creatively used election law to upgrade a misdemeanor into a federal crime in order to convict Trump, and perhaps keep him from qualifying as a candidate for office. This may well be the Nixon-like tool Democrats will try to use again to once more try to impeach a president they could not cheat out of an election as in 2020 or beat him in the 2024 election.

Clinton’s role in Watergate may have contributed to her husband’s eventual election as president, and the party support for her as a candidate in 2016, since she like Woodward, did her duty to bring down a president on behalf of the Democrats.

Democrats have no ethics as shown by the current counting of illegal ballots in Pennsylvania in an effort to overturn a GOP victory in the Senate race there. Rules don’t apply, but loyalty to a cause as displayed in Watergate by Woodward and Hillary is rewarded eventually.

So far, the antics have backfired. The NY case exposed the dirty tricks Democrats will resort to in order to retain power, legal or not, and the more they use dishonest means the way they seem to have done with Watergate, the stronger Trump becomes.

 

 


email to Al Sullivan

Friday, November 15, 2024

Fake news is the same old lie

 

MSNBC and The view have returned to the old con game that was played during the first trumpet administration that because of alternative media Trump won first against Hillary Clinton and now against Kamala Harris

What they really mean is they want Total censorship of alternative media so that they can maintain the lies they have been telling for the last 8 years

Only nobody is using the term fake news these days when that's really what MSNBC and the view have been promoting

They are really pissed that Twitter has become an independent voice much like the Trump app

But at the end of the day these people on the extreme left have not learned their lesson yet and if they continue down this road to try to censor people they will find that they no longer have any validity people don't take them seriously except the already brain dead

Factors that MSNBC and their affiliates want censorship of anybody but themselves and this is very orwellian

In other words you don't have a right to have access to any information source other what that what they provide and so they can keep you ignorant of what is really going on in the world

CVS NBC ABC or not far behind in this scam but it is the most extreme sites that are driving the leftist agenda not mainstream mainstream or simply obeying orders

Who The Mastermind of this scam has to be pretty brain dead himself since they tried censoring the social media sources prior to this and they fell flat in their face and you know what Einstein said about repeating the same thing and expecting a different result

Ultimately of course MSNBC and the view and their assorted cohorts are eventually going to fade into the history as non entities that they are they are full of racism and hatred and not very American at all almost kind of underground socialist or Marxist institutions that have been spouting this stuff for years but until recently weren't covered by the general public but as many corporations are finding out woke is broke and must be abandoned or the party as we knew it is not going to exist

While we’ve always had some version of slanted news, Fake News is something different, largely because it was invented to explain why Trump beat Clinton in 2016.

It was instituted by a collection of extreme leftist operating anonymously as PropOrNot who apparently picked up on Jill Stein’s theory that the Russians hacked into American voting machines to get Trump elected. This Russian Collusion fake news would get validity when Clinton campaign funded The Steele Dossier to double down on the accusation and eventually led to attempt to impeach Trump.

At first, even liberal media was reluctant to buy into PropOrNot’s propaganda. But eventually, the Washington Post – which had a hard on for Trump – took the bait, and gave this group of whackos prominence they didn’t deserve.

It didn’t stop there. The theory is that right wing (often called extreme or white supremisists)

were spreading lives through social media and needed to be reigned in by censoring the more popular social media sites – those operated by Meta such Facebook and Instagram were most aggeious, going to far to hire the same slanted writers that were slanting stories against Trump in mainstream media. But even Twitter because an instrument of censorship util it was purchased and many of the left wing radicals operating it were fired.

This benefits mainstream media because it gave bias publications like the New York Time and politically corrupt networks like MSNBC a monopoly on truth (even when it is clear what they published was remotely true).

With the internet and social media the false facts mainstream media spouted could be disputed (provided you did not try to use google to fact check, since it was part of this cabala). Eventually it became clear, the real source of fake news were these same mainstream outlets.

The idea back in 2016 is that voters – deluded by fake news (some of which was authored by the Russians) – voted for Trump and not for Clinton. This was assuming that the millions of voters had easy access to alternative press.

Even my former editor, who at times wrote for the Washington Post, filled our newspapers with this anti-fake news nonsense, trying to impress people at the top of the news food chain, even though the story got all the facts wrong, generally following the party line, as did most other mainstream media.

Now, the View and MSNBC are spinning the same sad tale because of Harris’ humiliating loss to Trump.

It is clear that Trump won only because a huge portion of the American population got dupped by stories that suggest Harris was untrustworthy, a woman who helped prosecute journalists who uncovered Planned Parenthood selling baby parts they gathered from their massive abortion operation, who put hundreds if not thousands of people of color in jail for petty crimes such as pot possession and then later promoted the release of violent criminals onto the streets, who not only supported the transitioning of kids, but also supported calling the parents who objected “terrorists.

We obviously hate women because we voted against two female candidates for president, the second of which was even black thus making us racist as well – this despite the fact that both women were possibly the worse candidates the Democratic party could have chosen.

Harris, of course, was part of a political coup against the sitting male Democratic president, who she and the Democratic Party help steal the 2020 election. (we’re still trying to figure out where the 13 million votes Biden got in 2020, but mysteriously went missing when Harris ran in 2024 (A computer glitch perhaps or perhaps the GOP was much more watchful this time around). But the moment, the Democrats didn’t need Biden anymore, they betrayed him, tried to put him out to pasture, not once, but twice, asking him to step aside for Harris to run, and then asking him to give up the presidency so Harris – clearly undeserving – could become the first female president.

It is obvious fake news created the illusion of inflation, even though people in supermarkets swear things were cheaper when Trump ran the country. Fake news accounts for all the reports of violence on the streets, massive theft from stories, and floods of illegal immigrants hogging up resources meant to help American poor.

Fake news accounted for high gasoline prices, mandates to get rid gas stoves, air conditioners, fossil fuel run cars.

Fake news clearly turns us all into white supremist racist, even though huge numbers of women, blacks and Latinos voted for him, too.

They were also obviously mislead, and so The View and MSNBC have decided we all need to be protected from misinformation that counters their left wing extremist agenda so we might not be led astray to vote for the GOP in the future.

Censorship will obviously keep us from thinking too much.


email to Al Sullivan