I hate political endorsements.
Mostly they have nothing to do with the candidates, and everything
to do with the people doing the endorsements.
This is particularly true when politicians, unions and other
prominent citizens wade into the middle of this race or that.
In most cases, a politician who endorses is usually sending a
message to his or her following that this or that candidate can be trusted “to
do the right thing,” and by “right thing,” he or she means the candidate will
do what the politician wants.
Unions have the same philosophy. A union endorsement has nothing
to do with a candidate’s ability to do a job in office, but on what side a
candidate will stand when it comes to negotiating contracts or other issues the
union finds attractive.
This is why I tend to vote for people who do not have a lot of
endorsements, and yet seem uniquely qualified to actually perform the job they
are running for.
This is particularly true in school board elections, where I want
a candidate to be sympathetic to teachers, but someone who isn’t going to sell
out the school district simply because he or she feels beholden due to a union
endorsement.
This is even truer when it comes to political heavy weights wading
into the middle of a school election, blurring the line between separation of
power.
Since I live in Jersey City , I have very few choices in the election
since at least three of the four candidates are so heavily weighted down with
endorsements from politicians, unions and even developers.
So turned off am I by the endorsements, I’ll most likely vote for
the one candidate without any.
In Bayonne – where I cannot vote – the matter is more complex, partly
because there are so many more candidates running for a number of different
terms of office.
Most people expected the mayor to refrain from endorsing any
candidate, so that there was significant disappointment when he did. This is
partly due to the fact that most the candidates running supported his election
two years ago.
The union endorsement is even more confusing. The union issued a
questionnaire to determine who they would support – looking for candidate
positions on things such as Core curriculum and testing, issues more relevant
to teachers and potential employment evaluations than actually educating kids.
While I mostly agree with teachers on both, I have a problem with unions
stacking the board with pro union board members when the community foots the
bill.
I agree.
ReplyDelete