From "Confessions of a Racist"
August 11, 2018
We live with myths
not reality
This is why so many
people these days believe they can recreate the past and get away with it, such
as endowing sainthood on people like Lincoln upon whose hands drips the blood
of 650,000 Americans, violations of civil rights, ignoring the Constitution,
and the detaining of tens of thousands simply because they came from or
professed sympathy for the South.
History as better
people have said before is written by the victorious and so winning can justify
mass slaughter since the ultimate result was the preservation of the union and
the myth of the freeing of slaves
Yet it seems clear
that war -- especially total war as it was waged-- was not necessary to free
the slaves and so Lincoln appears to have operated more on the principle of
protecting Northern Industrial interest. In fact, it appears that many in the
Republican party did not want the slaves set free, fearing they would move
north and take jobs held then by white people.
Even Lincoln seem to
have other plans for the slave when he eventually set them free, which appears
to be shipping them all back to Africa if so then the slaves lucked out when
Booth put a bullet in Lincoln's head.
Robert E Lee,
Jefferson Davis and Lincoln largely agreed on the fact that if slavery was left
alone, it would die out in the South as it had in the North – if, according to
Lincoln, slavery was contained to the states in which existed and not expanded
to new states. Free blacks already worked as laborers in the border states and
the South actually had twice as many societies to do away with slavery as the
north did.
This was right up
until the uprising in Haiti that resulted in the slaughter of 80,000 whites and
the rape and beating of countless others.
But even this only
slowed the progress of freeing slaves. Tt was Turner and his uprising in the
states that finally put the South on a different path as the South feared more
uprisings. It passed laws to prohibit the education of blacks, laws that
Stonewall Jackson ignored as he continued to educate slaves on how to read and
write.
But the real and most
lasting damage to the reform movements in the South came with John Brown, when the
wacko abolitionists in the north turned Brown, a murderer, into a hero. This
put the South firmly on the wrong side of history since it became clear that
the peaceful and loving an abolitionist movement of the north would not be
satisfied with anything less than massive bloodshed. This reflect many current and
similar trends today and became the driving force behind Lincoln's policies
even though Lincoln refused at first to free the slaves as the abolitionists
wanted.
Despite the rhetoric
by the wackos today who insist on tearing down Confederate statues few if any
dispute that slavery was wrong.
Robert E Lee called
it “a great evil.” Jefferson Davis insisted the Confederate Constitution outlaw
new shipments of slaves.
The issue was not whether
or not slavery should be abolished, but how and when, and whether or not those
who owned slaves should be allowed to bring them to future states out west, thus
expanding slavery beyond the South.
Until the annexation
of Texas, and the Missouri Compromise, slavery was largely contained to the
south. United States Congress was evenly split between northern and southern
states. But new states were coming into the union and the South feared that if
the north prohibited the spread of slave states to the West, the north would
gain votes in Congress and then impose even more economic hardships on the
south that the north already had.
Many of the radicals
of today who are tearing down statues claim the civil war was fought to free the
slaves. But in reality, it was a conflict over economic philosophy. The federal
government was reaping massive profits off the south by imposing high tariffs on
raw materials the south sent north. About 60 percent of the federal revenue
came from these tariffs. At the same time, northern industrialists were making
a fortune off the manufacture of finished goods that they sold back to the
south at unreasonable rates – a practice that helped motivate the original 13
colonies when Great Britain did the same thing.
Although the south
was largely an agricultural economy, it had begun to see a growth in its own
industrial base – prompting fears that north that exploited immigrants with
near starvation wages could not compete with the south using slaves for the
same jobs.
But by far the biggest
issue leading to the war is the same issue was face today as the vastly over
populated north with its abolitionists then and liberals today attempt to use
the federal government to impose its will on the smaller communities of the
south.
This is largely the liberal
left tried to do in the 2016 when it exploited its large populations in the
city and tried to impose liberal values onto small conservative towns in rural America,
New York and San Francisco trying to shove down the throats of little down America
their perception of what the world should be. In pre-Civil War days, it was a
pack of abolitionists and northern industrialists trying to force the south to live
by standards the north established, while the South defended the concept of
state’s rights. Northern abolitionist and liberals wanted to be able to set the
standards by which the rest of the nation lived and smaller communities of the
South much as the smaller communities that voted for Trump rebelled and
ultimately these states seceded from the Union.
The great question of
the Civil War was not whether slavery was legal or illegal. The U.S. Supreme
Court had already determined it was legal; the big question did the much more
populous states of the north have the right to use the federal government to
impose their will on the smaller populated states in the South, and whether
Hamilton and his ilk after the American revolution had violated the spirit of
the Constitution in an attempt to steal rights granted to the states and allow
the federal government to override those states’ rights.
Ironically, the 2016
election showed those small communities banding together to resist the same
conditions that led to the American Civil War, frustrating liberal cities powers
they had obtained through massive bloodshed.
This loss of power by
liberal cities is largely the motivation for tearing down Confederate statutes and
other atrocities committed by radicals who claim they are operating in the
interest of African-Americans and other minorities.
Trump's election
helped undo some of the victories the Abolitionist and other liberal radicals
of the north thought they had won in the Civil War and has the potential to
reversed some of the trends that we have seen in the nation towards a super
powerful federal government imposing its rights on States.
One of the other huge
unanswered questions at the beginning of the Civil War focused on whether the
states had the right to leave the Union as they believe they did when the
founding fathers set up the US Constitution.
Lincoln opposed this
even though he approved of it in other instances such as when Texas seceded
from Mexico or when West Virginia seceded from Virginia. This inconsistency is
something the South points out frequently since the war appears to have been a
matter of convenience not of necessity.
But even after
secession the South might have avoided war since Lincoln said he would not send
Union troops into the South unless the South attacked first. But then Lincoln
provoke the South into attacking by refusing to close Fort Sumter, one of two
forts left in Union hands in the south after secession and continued to charge
tariffs on ships coming out of the South’s largest harbor at Charleston. Had
the South restrained itself and avoided other predictable provocations Lincoln
might have thrown at them, American might have avoided the butchery of 650,000
people, and evil slavery might have collapsed under its own weight as the under
industrialized South had to come to grips with modern economic reality.
The attack on Fort
Sumter gave Lincoln the excuse to wage war on the south – total war in which
civilians became targets as well as the military, acts of aggression General
Lee refused to engage in,
Eventually the
northern total War became the model for how the union with late deal with
Native Americans.
Many people claim
Lincoln's election prompted the succession, which it did. Lincoln won in 1860
with only 40 percent of the popular vote and like Trump became president partly
because of an overwhelming majority of the Electoral College a sore Point among
Democrats who were expecting to see Clinton elected over Trump in 2016.
resume
resume
No comments:
Post a Comment