You have to admire how well Liz Cheney has worked to uphold
her family tradition
Her father, Dick Cheney, was well recognized as one of the evilest
men in American politics -- first serving as a kind of political hit man in the
Reagan administration then later as the puppet master manipulating President Bush
as vice president.
Liz Cheney’s role on the January 6th Committee demonstrates
just how well she learned the skills of a political hit man from her father,
learning how to cheat, steal, lie or perform any other ruthless acts in order
to achieve her political ends
Cheney is the contemporary version of Watergate’s John Dean
who was a sniveling little coward hoping in bed with Democrats against Nixon to
save his own miserable skin.
Cheney has slithered into the same democratic snake pit in
order to save her political career. She honestly believes somehow democrats
will be grateful to her for helping them bring down Donald Trump.
But she obviously did not inherit her father's intelligence
when she did his utter ruthlessness.
The January 6th Committee started out as a way for democrats
to distract public attention from their stealing an election and has evolved
into a soviet like trial to convict Trump of a phony insurrection.
This is a trial conducted by biased democrats and RINOs like
Cheney but no defense attorneys for those being accused. No cross examination.
No alternate witnesses. The only witnesses are those handpicked by the
democrats who are determined to make Trump into a modern-day Robert E Lee so
that they can evoke the 14th amendment to prevent Trump from running for
president in 2024.
It is a disparate ploy, but one fully supported by a corrupt
media upon which the general public depends for information.
Cheney meanwhile has become leader of this lynch mob even
when it us clear when all is said and done democrats will have as little use
for her as legitimate Republicans do now.
New York Times came out with a story embracing cannibalism
as if this is something new when it comes to American media.
News has been eating its human kind for centuries and never so
more so than today.
Of course, violating the most sacrosanct rule of humanity
may be a merely a ploy to make up for lost readership by adopting the antics of
the National Enquirer.
But it may well already be an established fact: the primary
activity of modern media is to devour human flesh as its recent coverage of the
January 6th committee shows.
Media how tends to sacrifice its political enemies as
subsidence with scathing headlines helping them to drink other people's blood
in order to survive.
The New York Times, however, went far beyond its usual
vulture-like feeding habits to suggest it might turn the rest of humanity in
the parasites previously exclusive to media.
This was no satire created by a noble writer such as
Jonathan Swift but the ranting of a lunatic staff writer typical of the kind of
journalist media has let loose on the world, a serious proposal by a sick and depraved
New York Times editorial staff that has run out of other norms to violate.
Unfortunately, the New York Times didn't even have the human
decency to offer themselves up as a possible solution to world hunger.We have such an excess of useless media; we
might be able to feed the world for a year if humanity doesn't run out of
antacid first from devouring such rancid meat.
This would have the added benefit of significantly reducing
the world's carbon foot print by halting the most significant source of
poisonous hot air. If people thought cows polluted at least they generally
pollute only out of one orifice whereas journalists pollute out of every pour.
Eventually, of course, we will regretfully run out of
journalists to skewer over the open fire. But we many never run out of
pontificating pompous self-righteous professors for which there will never be a
shortage if you can stand the unbearable taste.
Berkeley professor Khiara Bridges is mentally ill.
But she’s not alone. She has a not-so rare form of insanity
that is apparently more contagious than covid and twice as deadly.
She testified during the Senate hearing on reproductive care in a
post-Roe America and accused Sen. Josh Hawley of being "transphobic"
when he asked her how she thought men could have bear babies.
Bridges resorted the typical liberal trick of attacking Hawley
when he challenged her agenda as well as her common sense. She resorted to name
calling.
It is not transphobic to claim women have babied and men don’t,
regardless of how many hormones men might ingest or even how much surgery.
Reality is not a strong point when it comes to liberals like
Bridges, nor is common sense.
Bridges came to the hearing selling an agenda and got push
back when the agenda defied veracity.
We live in strange times where men want to be women and women
men.
Yet it is not a new concept.
Penis envy – although not always identify in that term – has existed
since the dawn of time, women coveting men’s phallic power while men jealously
envied women’s ability to propriate – women’s magical power to create life.
Men have always desired this power, even when women recklessly
abuse it through acts like abortion.
What isn’t nature, however, is the lunatic notion that men
can actually bear babies.
Perhaps as science advances, it may be made possible in the
future. But at this moment in time, it is a pathetic fantasy, that liberals
like Bridges cling to the way old Christians used to cling to the concept of a
flat earth.
Society has moved away from merely wishing for the impossible
to pretending it is possible, a wizard of oz effect that if you click your heals
and wish real hard it will come true.
This is the logic of immature minds, regardless of how many university
degrees that person possesses or which prestigious university in which she
happens to teach.
There is no doubt that some people are gay, although just
when this occurs in the human anatomy remains a mystery since some otherwise
straight people have gone through an experimental phase when young (often
associated with puberty) and then later decide as adults they are not.
This, however, differs significantly from being transgender
and whether or not that person was miscategorized at birth and given the wrong
label.
There is some legitimate argument as far as gender
assignment, especially when an infant is born with multiple organs and the
doctors make the choice as to which gender, he or she should become.
But the massive increase in transgender identification –
especially among Gen z – indicates more of a fad than fact, kids who might have
felt socially excluded from the various social clicks find acceptance and
welcoming in the transgender community.
Since kids are impressionable at an early age, teachers’ grooming
them becomes an even more dangerous trend, since as authorities figures these
questionable teachers have a huge influence on their yet to develop minds and
steering these kids become something that is basically criminal.
Kids need to sort it out for themselves, which is why there
are laws governing age of consent. We do not expect young people to make
serious decisions when they are not mature enough to fully understand the implications.
All that said, there are only two physical sexes, regardless
of what the overly educated Bridges might maintain, and only one of these is physically
capable of bearing children. To say otherwise, even from the mouth of a clearly
deluded professor, is not just dishonest, it is flatly crazy.
From the way New York City prosecutor, Alvin Bragg embraces
the criminal element, you would think Bragg has his underwear on too tight, so,
it is cutting circulation off to his brain.
Who else in their right mind would jail the victim in an
obvious robbery attempt, prosecuting the store owner for murdering someone who
had just tried to kill him?
Putting honest citizens in jail while letting out serial
offenders seems the act of a crazy man. And clearly it is.
But we can’t completely blame Bragg for these acts of
madness. He has caught a disease which scrambles people’s brains and makes right
look like wrong, and sinners look like saints.
Bragg isn’t the only such suffer. Liberal prosecutors across
the country have also caught this nasty bug, trying to sell the public on the
notion that criminals are victims of society and that racism and other factors
have turned them into the thugs and murders they are, and that it is up to
prosecutors like Bragg to help make amends by letting such vicious characters
loose on the world to get reparations from the while people who engage in institutional
racism.
Bragg clearly has caught this bug worse than others,
although the son of 1960s bomb throwing weather underground radical Kathy Boudin,
seems as infected as Bragg. Fortunately, California has a recall ability and
used it to toss the perverted Boudin out of office before he could abuse more
crime victims by letting even more thugs out of jail.
New York, however, does not allow voters to act on their
own, forcing people to plead with the sitting governor to get rid of radical
prosecutors like Bragg. Unfortunately, the sitting governor is nearly as
radical as Bragg is, part of that anti-white establishment that wants to transplant
whites with people of color, regardless of their abilities or their inclination
towards crime.
Some people might well feel sorry for Bragg for how much
radical professors in college inflicted their twisted logic on him, a pathetic
case which clearly has no cure, and must be dumped out of office and put
somewhere (perhaps in a straight jacket) where he can do no more harm.
This, of course, will require a new governor, and
fortunately there is an election coming up.
The problem is: how many more people can Bragg hurt before
the new governor is sworn in, and how many more hardened criminals will he let
loose into unsuspecting society?
Another day, another mass shooting, and another culprit the
police failed to do anything about when there was plenty of warning.
The shooting inspired the Democrats to scream more about
limiting gun sales, when each shooting like this only inspires ordinary people
to buy more guns because the system, we would have to rely on to protect us
(and which the Democrats would have us depend on) is broken.
The FBI is completely useless, more interested in going
after parents who protest against the teaching of critical race theory than
going after people who actually post a threat.
Local police – as several incidents recent – are either too
scared, too equipped or too bureaucratic to actually do their job.
Many of the shooters are teens with serious mental health
problems, and an underfunded and ill-educated mental health system. Teachers,
who might be the first alert to these troubled teens, appear to be more
interested in grooming the next generation of transgender kids or stoking up
racial hate in the classroom.
So, what’s the answer? Few guns?
School safety is easy. We just don’t do what is necessary to
protect them. Security in airports is a good model for school safety since
there hasn’t been a serious incident in air traffic since 9/11 and nearly 20
years prior to that.
Protecting a parade is more difficult, although Times Square
on New Year’s Day is a good model, allowing people into a confined area after
their bags have been checked.
But ultimately, government needs to invest more in mental health,
and to set up a better system of red flags – not for guns, but for potentially dangerous,
since almost everyone of these crazies was on the public safety radar prior to
these mass murders.
The fact is, even if you eliminate guns the way the liberals
would have it, the danger remains. You can kill just as many people by mowing
them down in a car (even if the car is electric), and as New York City subways
have recently shown, knives can be a very effective means of killing people in enclosed
spaces.
If someone is as whacky as the most recent shooter was, then
the system needs to act when there are obvious signs. You’re not going to get
rid of legal guns (no matter how large the magazine) if the cops won’t take
their guns out of their holsters when the shooting stops.
Private citizens will buy more guns to protect themselves when
they believe the police won’t.
But investing in police isn’t a popular philosophy among
Democrats these days, who believe every person of any color behind the badge is
racist. Cutting police budgets because of some imaginary systemic racist fantasy
doesn’t protect people – although if you believe the Democratic extremists,
cops are only there to protect rich white people and their wealth. Tell that to
the victims in the schools and streets, many of whom aren’t white or rich.
Democrats – with the help of RINOs like Liz Cheney – are desperate
to turn the Jan. 6 protest into an insurrection.
And for good reason (at least in their minds).
January 6 was not an insurrection by any means, legally or by
any other means.
Provoked by agitators from left wing Antifa and BLM, some of
the protesters got a bit out of control. But no worse than any of the left wing
protests from the 1960s such as at Columbia University – which Jan. 6 resembles
– when left wing radicals stormed the college, took over the offices, and one radical
(a one time close friend of mine) was photographed by The New York Times
sitting in the college presidents desk, smoking one of the college president’s
cigars.
Photographs from the Columbia University take over so resemble
the Jan. 6 protest, they could substitute for each other with most people being
unable to tell the difference.
The Jan. 6 committee was deliberately developed to sell the
idea of insurrection – refusing to accept any Republicans on the committee except
those handpicked by the Democrats (RINOs like Liz Cheney).
The committee’s sole purpose is to create the illusion of an
insurrection and blame Trump for orchestrating it.
There is method to this madness. By manufacturing phony
witnesses, getting people to lie under oath, and to build a false case against
Truth, the committee (and the Democrats) hope to invoke the 14th amendment that
prohibits anyone involved in an insurrection from holding elected office.
The problem for the Jan 6 Committee, the democrats and their
corrupt media, Jan. 6 does not meet the definition of an insurrection.
But this won’t stop media from promoting it as one, in an
attempt to get GOP voters to abandon Trump in favor of a GOP candidate the
Democrats think they can beat.
How long the farce of the Jan. 6 Committee continues is
anybody’s guess. It’s predecessor, The House of Un-American Activities, went on
for almost a decade and destroyed thousands of people’s lives. You can expect
the Jan. 6 Committee to ruin reputations and do anything else underhanded to try
to derail the Trump reelection.
The question remains how long before a real court with a
real judge throws out the Committee’s complaint and whether or not Garland, the
Democratic hit man, will be willing to risk his career to support conclusions
made by dishonest witnesses.
And if this attempt to subvert the use of the 14th Amendment
fails, will Democrats return to the tried-and-true method for winning in 2024,
stealing another election?
Liberal media is desperate to rescue their chief and most
unreliable witness for the shit show blatantly called the Jan. 6 committee. And many GOP people are panicking rather than
fighting back, looking to jump ship in order to avoid becoming a target
themselves.
The most recent effort by media is an effort to save their
witness by sewing confusion when it comes to what the Trump did with the Secret
Service in the lead up to the Jan. 6 protest.
While some secret service agents claim the Jan. 6 witness
lied, media has come up with unnamed sources that claim differently, creating a
fictional theory of good secret service agents and those who are loyal to Trump.
Media completely ignores the fact that it was physically
impossible for Trump to have grabbed the steering wheel as the Jan. 6 witness
claims someone told her he had.
The Jan. 6 committee is notorious at passing fiction off as
fact and this is no exception.
The committee’s whole function is scare the hell out of
Trump’s support in the GOP and get these somewhat less than RINOs to abandoned him
for a candidate the Democrats think they can beat in the 2024 election, when
polls say Democrats do not stand a chance against Trump unless they steal that
election, too.
While it is very likely someone like that scumbag Garland
will indict Trump on these trumped-up charges, the accusations won’t hold up in
court when the Jan. 6 committee’s witnesses get cross examined and their so-called
facts are questioned. Such as trial will amount to the Russian Collusion hoax
and the two failed attempts to impeach Trump.
But it may be enough to panic Trump’s GOP support, which is
why the Democrats and media are selling this horseshit as fact.
If you are a Trump supporter, understand mainstream GOP is
not your friend.
Most of the GOP are just as much swamp-dwellers as the
Democrats are, pond scum that needs the swamp to survive, willing to trade off
with the Democrats in order to get their share of the political pie.
While George W. Bush and Dick Cheney his evil guru aren’t
quite RINOs the way Liz Cheney turned out to be, they were too stupid – like most
of the GOP – to see what Barrack Obama changed the rules of the game when he
attempted to hand over reigns of power to Hillary Clinton.
Democrats intended to keep hold of power, despite previous
arrangements. Fortunately, Trump upset their apple cart, which is why they needed
to steal an election in 2020 and are desperate to get Trump out of the running
in 2024.
The GOP ignorantly presumes if they support this effort,
they can get back to doing business as usual with the Democrats when they can’t.
Trump is a populist and like all populists before him is
hated equally by both mainstream parties because he can’t be relied on to play
the game. The GOP is scared because Trump really means it when he says he wants
to drain the swamp and flush all the would-be Liz Cheneys down the toilet with
the rest of the crap.
Stopping Trump is the whole reason the Jan. 6 committee was
invented – not to seek justice but to hang an albatross of lies around his neck
to keep him from running for president again.
This wink and nod arrangement between the GOP and Democrats
is the reason why publications like The Washington Examiner and the National
Review are supporting the Jan. 6 committee – after all, these like Fox and
other so-called conservative publications rely on the swamp for their survival,
too, acting as the loyal opposition to the Democrats without actually opposing
anything the Democrats actually do.
Fortunately, or unfortunately, the Jan. 6 Committee is
illegal, and will have its rulings overturned the minute their accusations arrive
in any legitimate court where witnesses can be cross examined, and testimony
debunked.
But the purpose of the committee is not legal, it is a
publicity stunt, to generate enough negative headlines to cow the GOP into giving
up on Trump, a brilliant move that relies on the GOP’s stupid notion that if
they abandon Trump, they will ever have a rat’s chance in hell of regaining
power.
Liberal males are castrating themselves at record numbers,
according a report this week.
The latest patch comes as a result of the US Supreme Court’s
decision to restore abortion regulations to the states.
These mostly urban males are seeking vasectomies apparently to
satisfy the demands of their female friends, thus doing away with the need to
engage in protected sex.
This batch of self-castrating males follows a recent trend in
which other males are castrating themselves in the transgender movement.
While we hear the howl of conservatives about how bad this
is, these trends actual bode well for the future by removing from the national gene
pool the liberal (some call it the pussy-whipped) gene and promises to restore
a strong male gene pool for the future.
This will take time, of course, since population changes
slowly, and there is no guarantee that all the liberals will go as far as to
castrate themselves, regardless of the current fashion.
And many of the castrated males may well live on for a long
time as modern day eunuch, acting out their annoying sexual fantasies for the
foreseeable future.
The trend for castration does not deal with the dominant woman
syndrome which is partly behind these castrations, men unable to compete in the
world give up, surrender their masculinity and leave powerful women to direct
them – even to the demise of their masculine species.
Fortunately, this trend tends to be concentrated in liberal
urban areas and on both coasts, where the inevitable decline of the male species
will force dominant females to seek out other means to continue their gene pool
– although with places like New York and California allowing abortions right up
to the day of birth, we might well see the total decline of liberals both male,
female and everything in between.
The great hope for American mankind is to keep this trend from
spreading into the heart land where real men and women still exist, and the Supreme
Court decision goes a long way to preventing this, as long as liberals are
prevented from doing away with the filibuster or stacking a supreme court with
castrated men and dominant women.
This is all about saving the human race from extinction.
My mother always made me divert my eyes when we passed that
doctor’s office on Lakeview Avenue in Paterson years ago.
I didn’t know why then, a secret my mother kept nearly to
her grave, about her cousin and best friend Kitty who had gone there to get rid
of a problem she could not or would not solve by marriage.
Where Kitty got the money, my mother never said. But Kitty
was a popular girl and if the sugar daddy that created the problem wouldn’t pay
for its solution, then one of her other sugar daddies would.
The small estate testified to that doctor’s success; large
urn-like planters situated on either side of the long walk that led up to the
front door.
Even back then in the late 1940s when Kitty’s event
transpired, doctors like this made their side money off spoiled girls who got
themselves in trouble and expected their parents to pay to get them out of it.
Poorer neighborhoods had less prestigious doctors to do it,
or even underpaid interns from the local hospitals looking to pick up an extra
buck or two for their service.
The really poor or really desperate found cheaper, riskier
means to get rid of their shame, dumping the results in some nearby trash bin
as they staggered home lucky not to bleed to death along the way.
Unlike many of the spoiled kids from nearby towns, Kitty
wasn’t rich, but managed to get enough to hire this butcher, and made my mother
keep her secret, and my mother did, long after Kitty probably forgot about it
herself, my mother not even divulging it to the priest in confession, carrying
this mortal sin inside her until it drove her crazy, struggling perhaps with
the vague thought of how she might solve her problem when her time came, after
her bastard of a husband first took off, leaving her alone and pregnant, a
notion that if carried out might have ended my existence before it began.
Years later, society gave up this unspoken side profession
with Roe vs Wade, when modern technology and equally unethical doctors,
employed an assembly line approach to help women eliminate the problem all
their wrong decisions got them into in the first place. So efficient was this
new technique these butchers could later sell the body parts of the unborn to
help deal with their bottom line, turning the whole affair into little more
than a tooth extraction.
To make themselves feel less guilty, these women and doctors
created a whole variety of myths to justify their actions, it isn’t life they
were removing, or that a woman might risk her own life if the doctors did not
perform the action. Many of these myths claim a woman should not bear a child
born out of rape or incest, nor should a predictably deformed child be brought
into world, or that it is cruel to bring a child into the world without hope of
adoption.
Unfortunately, these account for about 8 percent of all the
abortions in the United States, all the rest are elective, meaning that some
woman decided that a baby does not fit into her life style or the relationship
out of which the pregnancy came didn’t quite work out as planned, or rage at
the father made the woman terminate the birth. In many cases, it is merely a matter
of convenience.
The most popular myth involves the innocent young girl who
falls deeply in love with a boy who promises her undying love, then abandons
her when she ends of pregnant as a result of unprotected sex. She is portrayed
as an utterly innocent victim, drawn in by the boy, and when pregnant, she has
no other choice but to seek a doctor to help her chop the kid to pieces.
Advocates claim this poor unfortunate girl is humiliated by
pro-life people as she rushes into the clinic to get the dee done. In every
telling, this girl is always the victim and the boy the culprit or some other
version where she is a woman of colors, raised in a poor family without father,
sometimes raised by an elderly grandmother, leaving her few or no resources to
raise the child if allowed to be born.
Yet no matter how pro-abortion advocates paint this girl,
she is still a victim of her own choices, engaged in an act of sex for which
she is partly responsible.
Being a single mother is difficult as I well know, since my
mother dragged me everywhere with her when I was young, struggling through low
paying jobs to feed and cloth me. My ex-wife suffered a similar fate after she
fled west and had to fend for herself and our child – as have many brave women
who have resisted the easy way out, choosing to raise their kids rather than
kill them. But we have raised a society of cowards, who take pleasure in the
sexual act, but no responsibility for its outcome, who would rather murder
their off spring rather than raise them, many leaving a trail of body parts
behind them as if from war.
One of the hardest moments in my life came when my daughter
asked me to pay for her abortion, even though her boyfriend wanted to marry her,
and her mother wanted to adopt her child if allowed to be born.
I keep thinking of the doctors who engage in these mass
murders, violating their oath to save lives by taking lives instead, doctors
who live in fancy houses behind a façade of righteousness, who kill and kill
but never get punished, upstanding moral citizens with blood dripping from
their fingers, deluding themselves and us into believing they are doing
something to help humanity.
I still divert my gaze when I walk past that house in
Paterson, even though the doctor who lived in it is long gone, the vicious
memory of what he did inside that place still haunting me as it did my mother.
I divert my gaze going passed Planned Parenthood as well where mass murder is
performed with such efficiency, Nazis would envy them, mass murder without
shame or remorse.
