Monday,
September 24, 2018
Democrats
sink to new lows with the Kavanaugh smear.
Every
time I hear Michael
Avenatti talk, I have to reach for the hand sanitizer, even though I know you
can’t catch something just from listening to a shyster talk.
This is a man who gives ambulance
chasing a bad name and so it becomes even more ludicrous to realize that is primary
client is an over priced prostitute, and that he makes her living pimping out.
So, hear him rant about how
many women he can produce when it comes to smearing Kavanaugh, I have to clean
out my ear wax to make sure I actually heard him correctly.
If the politics wasn’t so
serious, I would rate Avenatti slightly above a Saturday Night Live skit, more
tragic than funny, the way a falling down comic routine is funny and sad.
But the real sadness is
that liberals are taking Avenatti seriously, a matter of convenience, because
MeToo would much rather trust slime balls than legitimate people, especially
when it comes to smearing someone to get what they want.
Avenatti enters stage left because
the two women who have tried to smear Kavanaugh are so utterly unbelievable – an
orchestrated attack by Democrats like Feinstein and fed through her favorite
prostitute of a news organization, The New Yorker.
As it turned out, the third witness recanted her claims even before the vote was taken, something Democrats, Feinstein and The New Yorker knew about, but kept silent over in order to continue to feed this hateful myth some still believe as true.
I guess people are just too stupid to realize that The New Yorker is a glorified rag, a fanzine for the urban intellectual who love cartoons that make no sense and stories that use big words they have to look up – breaking these stories because nobody actually sees the magazine as remotely objective. The fact is even the most slanted other news media won’t break the story as suspect as this, but will let The New Yorker do it, and then quote it the way slanted CNN is always quoting The Washington Post.
As it turned out, the third witness recanted her claims even before the vote was taken, something Democrats, Feinstein and The New Yorker knew about, but kept silent over in order to continue to feed this hateful myth some still believe as true.
I guess people are just too stupid to realize that The New Yorker is a glorified rag, a fanzine for the urban intellectual who love cartoons that make no sense and stories that use big words they have to look up – breaking these stories because nobody actually sees the magazine as remotely objective. The fact is even the most slanted other news media won’t break the story as suspect as this, but will let The New Yorker do it, and then quote it the way slanted CNN is always quoting The Washington Post.
But Avenatti? Really?
We’re not even talking tabloid
journalism when it comes to him. He’s the mouth that roar, emitting all kinds
of steam, but little brain.
So that he winds up with
clients like Stormy Daniels, who made her living on her back until she figured
out she could make more through black mail.
And now, she published a
book that is likely to get reviewed in The New Yorker which will have to make
up the big words she’s too stupid to look up for herself.
The fact that so many women
are so desperate to destroy Kavanaugh as to align themselves with Daniels and
Avenatti is testimony to the lack of intelligence so called education, upwardly
mobile women seem to possess.
You have two women from two
parts of Kavanaugh’s life coming forward to claim that he sexually abused them,
women who have strong connection to anti-Trump movements, who want more than
anything to keep him from the court and are willing to prostitute themselves in
much the same way Daniels has to accomplish it.
MeToo has always been
questionable, a kind of vigilantism designed to circumvent the legal process to
convict people who may not have done anything but are crucified in headlines by
a more than willing media.
Why do so many people
believe these two women and allow themselves to be aligned with people like
Avenatti, whose sole motive is to make as much money for his client and made as
many headlines to bolster his career?
When a woman claims a man
raped her, she is putting herself on the line, making a claim that ruins a life
forever. If she is lying, then she is destroying other women who really have
been raped. While we would expect any sort of twisted fact to come out of
Avenatti’s forked tongue, but Ford and her latest accomplice are doing a
disservice to women who really have been raped. It’s sad, pathetic, and they
come off as bad overall as Daniel’s does, only not nearly as honest as she is.
We know what her motives are. We know that she will say and do anything to get
what she wants. But with the two witnesses, we assume they have some shred of
decency – but they don’t.
No comments:
Post a Comment