Wednesday, September 19, 2018

Soro's funded Fanatic Ford’s failed attack




Wednesday, September 19, 2018

The sad part about Ford and her accusations against Kavanagh it's not the fact that she wore a pink hat and carried a sign saying, “not my president,” typical of the thoughtless masses that have hit the street since Trump's election.
As it turns out, Ford's attorney is a member of George Soros' team. Soros has been the big money behind all of the massive protests -- including the new black uprising and the women's marches. His millions paid for signs, buses and other materials in the so-called spontaneous anti-gun rallies and the campus protests after Trump's election.
The sad part is that there are armies of women just like her willing to believe her without proof in order to bring down a judge they disapprove of and want to stop.
Part of the problem is the relentless anti-Trump media that spreads misinformation and plays up these wacky movements for their own agenda.
More significant is the fact that people now do not rely on facts, do not delve into the truth of what they hear, but accept whatever headlines that supports what they want to believe and then act upon it.
As deluded as Ford was in becoming the good soldier in this campaign to bring down Kavanaugh, she is only a symptom of a more serious problem, a disease that has infected the best educated and a population who should know better.
We live in a time when we have access too much information and yet choose to remain ugly ignorant deliberately seeking out only that which supports are already preconceived notions.
Ford's pink half an anti-Trump sign along with her sneaky behavior leading up to this accusation bodes ill for the truth of what she claimed.
She did not come forward early, yet she took preparations to as if this was a deliberately calculated strategy not much different from the Anita Hill Attack on Thomas three decades ago.
The fact that the Democrats knew this was in the works as early as July and chose to launch the attack through an extremely liberal and elitist magazine to give it credibility suggests that even they did not have confidence in Ford said, but a last-ditch effort to unseat Kavanaugh prior to the vote that would confirm him to the Supreme Court.
The Democrats appeared to think the accusation would shake the GOP's confidence in the judge and perhaps to intimidate him into withdrawing his nomination.
This is called a bluff in poker and fortunately the GOP called that bluff.
And it appears that Ford and the Democrats have decided to fold rather than have their plot exposed.
The Democrats of course we're relying on the me-too movement and the credibility media has given to it over the last year where unsubstantiated claims intimidate people into resignation, or get them fired, or simply ruin their lives.
This is a kind of intimidation, emasculating men and forcing them into submission and in a perverted war between the sexes.
I would like to think people will learn a valuable lesson from Ford. but it's not likely.
While this is The Girl Who Cried Wolf, this will keep going on as long as media keeps giving headlines to scurrilous claims, and a ruthless new feminist movement sees it as a way of gaining power.
The feminist movement that fueled this attack has a bigger game plan lies and deceit do not matter as long as the ultimate goal of regaining power is achieved.
the me-too movement that fuels vicious attacks such as these is based on a historic suffragette movement and the pre-Civil War feminist uprising.
One Southern historian pointed out women's movement in the north is based on hate mostly hatred of men and largely overran other women’s movements based on mutual respect
We are largely watching the women's movement that wants to replace men not have an equal partnership and as long as this power grab is the goal, we will continue to have headlines promoting the girl who cried wolf.
Ford and her followers who will continue to rant and rave even without proof against an establishment they hate and make accusations against people they had without evidence.


1 comment: