Whenever someone does something ugly, they give it a very
positive name.
Nothing is truer in this regard than the fantasy of reproductive
rights. What the left means when they say it, is the ability to have irresponsible,
unprotected sex – without consequence.
Recent surveys show few liberal women these days intend to
reproduce at all.
So abortion is largely protecting their ability to be irresponsible,
and they blame the U.S. Supreme Court for denying this right to extinguish life
for the convenience – especially when it comes to their right to abort a baby
right up to the moment of birth.
They keep claiming the court is stopping them from doing so.
the US supreme Court did not ban abortions
it's ruling 2 years ago simply said that the US Constitution
does not cover abortion rights and therefore it is up to each state to decide
for itself
this frustrates abortion advocates who have since 1972 used
roe versus Wade to impose abortions universally even when a majority of a
state's population might be opposed to it
This is typical liberal behavior and why they hate the
conservative court. In the past, these liberals have used the high court to
impose their agenda on other people, and now get frustrated when they can
longer dictate their agenda/
in fact the US supreme Court has ruled in several cases to
support those States who actually approve of abortion such as refusing to
restrict the use of the abortion pill which is about to become over the counter
in many states
but this is not enough for these so-called reproductive
Rights activist who want to force every state to comply to its idea of what
reproductive Rights, meaning they want what they want, ignoring the democratic
process.
These activists are about to reconfigure constitutional
amendment for equal rights (which failed in the 1970s) to force states to
provide abortions including abortion to the day of birth
this also means that any Doctor who opposes abortion would
be forced to provide them at the risk of losing his or her license
hospitals that generally do not provide abortions because of
religious or other reasons would also fear the wrath of self declared god-like
liberalsd.
the reason for universal abortion has very little to do with
actual life and death issue but the convenience of most people who want to have
unprotected sex and not bear the consequences
Radicals often claim rape victims should not be forced to
bear the child of their abuser, a fair point, except that abortions as a result
of rape constitute far less than one percent of the millions of abortions done
each year.
planned Parenthood started out as an institution to castrate
black people which they have since backed off of even though it is the biggest
provider of abortions in the country
abortions along with climate change or big business for some
groups such as planned parenthood
and so what gets disguised as my body etc is really about
money and the power to force other people to comply with their point of view
rather than go through the Democratic process in each state of winning the
argument as to why abortions might be good and aborting babies just before
they're born
this last is really the crux of the argument since abortion
rights people have claimed that an embryo is not a life and have opposed
heartbeat laws that would prohibit abortion once the heartbeat is detected
But since abortions to the point of birth mean that a baby
is fully formed this argument of embryo life goes out the window
it is a heated issue because for anti-abortion people
believe abortion is murder regardless of when it occurs which may be an
unreasonable point of view
but for advocates of women's rights it is about how to force
other people to do what they want and it is a misuse of the US Constitution to
violate Democratic process
in other words the Democrats who are primarily pro-choice do
not want to rely on Democratic process to decide whether a state would provide
abortions or not
you don't get that from the rhetoric in which they are
screaming not to interfere with what goes on in their body. this is like saying
we have no right to judge or stop someone from shooting somebody which is the
argument for banning guns, when in fact many more “people” are killed by
abortionists than by gun-wielding maniacs, and have created a Holocaust that
rivals the Nazis for the number of deaths incurred.
I don't really see the difference between banning guns to
prevent people from killing people or banning abortions to keep people from
killing people. But liberals want to ban guns, but not abortions.
No comments:
Post a Comment