Ford is unbelievable

Friday, September 28, 2018

Ford is either lying or has serious emotional problems, something GOP legislators are too scared to raise in a public forum.

Although her testimony was emotional, it was also full of holes, which the GOP’s attorney perhaps deliberately chose not to explore – having served as a prosecutor on the other side for decades.

First of all, Ford’s story has changed over the years. She can’t remember the location of the alleged attack, but gave testimony describing every other detail inside the room, including supposedly those who were in the room with her – although even this account changed with each report.
She and her lawyer have yet to turn over the actual lie detector results to the committee. And as it turns out, the memories she claims to have of the incident were suppressed memories obtained through hypnosis and absolutely inadmissible” in the court of law in many states, including New York and Maryland.
Not only could Ford not name the month in 1982 in which the supposed attack occurred, she gave conflicting reports of the number of men involved. At one point, she claimed two boys were in the room. She told her therapist in 2012 (when she first mentioned the attack – later telling two friends in 2014 and 2015, but not her husband) that four boys were in the room.

Ford testified that the memories of the alleged rape and Kavanaugh came up in counseling in 2012 after she and her husband argued over the need for a second front door to their home. She claimed the alleged rape attempt made her feel claustrophobic. the fact that the husband and wife had to seek counseling to resolve this suggests that Ford was having emotional issues. But more importantly, a published report said a check on when building permits were taken out on the project show this occurred in 2008 not 2012. 
The Washington Post, attempting to do damage control for the Democrats, claims this was simply confusion between Ford and her therapist. Ford apparently claimed there were five people at the party including herself.

She named names of three of the four boys, but the fourth person turned out to be a girl, later a Democrat and a long-time friend of Ford’s, denied any such party ever took place. This is consistent with the three boys Ford named.

Ford, who has been very active in pro-abortion and anti-Trump events sent a letter to Feinstein, but asking the information be kept private.
According to one published account, Ford is the daughter of a CIA and an employee of Fienstein's husband, Richard Blum -- so Feinstein didn't have to look far to find someone to testify against Kavanaugh.
Although Feinstein claims she didn’t leak the letter to The New Yorker, with whom she has had past ties, the New Yorker went public with a vengeance.

While pro-Ford followers mock the senators for asking who paid for the lie detector test Ford took in July, it is relevant because some claim it was paid for by George Soros, a notorious Democratic political boss, who reportedly also paid for Ford’s attorney, Debra Katz who donated to Democratic campaigned but also is associated with anti-Trump groups. Katz called Trump supporters “Miscreants,” but at the same time defended Bill Clinton’s sexual harassment of Paul Jones in the 1990s.
Ford also said she had been asked scores of questions on the lie detector test, when it turns out, she was only asked two.

More importantly, several news organizations who are investigating Ford, noted that her brother once represented a company known for Democratic dirty tricks, including those with faked forensic analysis in defense of Planned Parenthood.”

While the Washington Post has claimed otherwise, there is some evidence suggesting that Kavanaugh’s mother presided over the foreclosure of a home Ford’s parents owned.
Ford also told the senate committee that fear of flying had prevented her for testifying sooner -- thus as Kavanaugh pointed out delayed the hearing and allowed Democrats more time to seek out other so called accusers.  Ford and her close friends claimed she disliked being in enclosed spaces for extended periods of time -- something she claimed as a result of the rape attempt in high school.
Ford, during testimony, called herself a research pychologist at the Stanford School of Medicine. But a published account said a search through the Department of Consumer Affairs License Bureau 
found no record. 
NPR -- doing its usual damage control for the Democrats said California law allows the title "doctor" for a narrow group of medical and dental professionals.
So in calling herself doctor, Ford could have been in violation of California law, and this equates to a false statement made under oath.
So in testimony, she called herself "a professor" at Palo Alto University and  a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine.
Unfortunately, even calling herself  a “psychologist” may violate state laws since such a person must be licensed by the California Board of Psychology.
Published accounts claim, Ford is not licensed in the state of California and there is no record under the Department of Consumer Affairs License Bureau to show she ever was.
Democrats apparently were concerned over Ford’s lack of credibility and so desperately sought out other alleged victims that could build a case against Kavanaugh.

The ever-helpful New Yorker was more than happy to oblige and came up Deborah Ramirez, who went to Yale with him. She claimed he exposed himself to her at a college party in 1984.  She later told another friend that she could not be sure it was Kavanaugh at all.

The New York Times investigated and found the claims so unsubstantial it refused to report the story. But this didn’t stop The New Yorker which, however, failed to report that Ramirez had received a 2003 scholarship from – yes, political boss, George Soros.
Ramirez's accusation that Kavanaugh allegedly thrust his penis in her face at a dorm party, could not be supported by Liz Swisher, her college roommate. Swisher said Kavanaugh drank heavily, but she never saw him do anything sexually aggressive.
A third witness, Julie Swetnick, produced by a slimy attorney Avenatti, was so unreliable, nobody – not even the Democrats took, her seriously – except for Feinstein who appears will use anything no matter how unreliable against Kavanaugh.

Swetnick claimed that she saw Kavanaugh and his best friend at parties where they engaged in gang bangs and that she was a victim of one of these. The fact that Swetnick continued to attend parties in which this alleged behavior was going on is suspect enough, but the details read more like a scene from one of Stormy Daniels porn movies than any reality. 

 There is good reason for Democrats to worry since published reports claim the third witness’s Florida boyfriend took out a restraining order against her.

In addition, reports now show that a company she worked for filed a suit against her in 2000 for "unwelcome, sexually offensive conduct." The company's human resource department apparently came up with two male witnesses against her. Swetnick has denied these charges and in fact apparently accused the two males of sexual harassment, the company apparently decided had no merit. She eventually withdrew her charges against the men.

The company also alleged that she had lied about graduating from John Hopkins University. 
She was allowed to take a leave of absence on medical issues.
In March 2001, Swetnick's boyfriend, filed a restraining order against her, claiming she had threatened him.
There were several anonymous statements sent to Feinstein making an assortment of claims. But one was recently refuted in a letter by Dabney Friedrich, who dated Judge Kavanaugh in 1998
She denied that Kavanaugh ever shoved her against a wall and one of these anti-Kavanaugh hidden attackers claimed. she called the allegation "offensive and absurd."
Another man accused Kavanauh of sexually assaulting a woman in Rhode Island. After the claim was made public, the man who made it recanted his story. He is being investigated by the FBI and can be charged.
The fact that Feinstein and her henchmen are relying on these characters to support Ford’s claims shows how desperate they are, and why the Democrats likely discouraged the other witnesses from coming before the senate committee.

While Ford’s emotional testimony seemed to play out well until you actually study the facts, the other two are so unbelievable, they would have actually damaged Ford’s case – even though she clearly is not believable.

Long after Kavanaugh was confirmed by a razor-thin majority, the Senate Judiciary Committee  released a report which was largely ignored by major media.
The committee interviewed a man who believes he was the man involved in Ford in high school, not Kavanaugh.
Ford claimed Kavanaugh tried to remove her clothing during the party but could not because she wore a bathinsuit, and she managed to escape the rape when Kavanaugh's friend, Mark Judge jumped on top of them.
While Ford said she was 100 percent positive it was Kavanaugh, the man interviewed said he was kissing her when a friend, not Judge jumped on them as a joke, and that the making out session with Ford was consentitual. 
Ford tried to get her high school friend to collaborate her account against Kavanaugh. But her friend at first did not, then Monica McLean, a former FBI employee apparently tried to her this woman go change her story to help Ford.
The report also disputed other claims against Kavanaugh, including one witness -- supplied by The New Yorker magazine -- who said Kavanaugh had a reputation for exposing himself in college party. 
It turns out this was another man entirely, a fact that The New Yorker apparently was aware of when it published its account.

Kavanaugh is the real rape victim

MeToo Strategy against Kavanauh

Ford is just Anita Hill scam reconfigured

The MeToo strategy against Kavanaugh

Thursday, September 27, 2018

It appears Democrats want to turn Kavanaugh into Bill Cosby, making up in number of questionable allegation when they cannot produce in fact.

While Ford – who is a good Democratic soldier – may seem the most valid, her testimony is weak because of lack of specific facts.

We don’t even know if she has a grudge against Kavanaugh from his spurning her in high school or not, or that she deliberately named him instead of the real culprit from a real event in order to stop Kavanaugh from becoming a supreme court justice.

Search as hard as media has, there are second hand testimony from people she supposedly told about this as late as 2015 and 2016, and even this must be taken on the word of very close friends of Ford’s who might well want to protect her.

The other so called accusers are so unreliable that even The New York Times, which would love to bring Kavanaugh down, would not print some of what they said, leaving this chore up to the extremely scummy New Yorker – which will print anything as long as it is anti Trump.

But this has not stopped an army of anti-Trump, pro-abortion women from believing every word and media from repeating the scurrilous claims made by questionable people against him.

Accusers which is typical of the MeToo charade are all women, and many of them with an ax to grind against Kavanaugh because of his conservative position.

Ford’s witnesses are not witnesses at all, but people she supposedly told.

The second accuser recanted some of her claims telling some of her friends that it might not have been Kavanaugh at all (her attack coming just when Ford’s testimony started to seem doubtful).

The rest of the claims – some made anonymously – have so little merit, most media would laugh at them had they not become part of a political Normandy Beach attack where the Democrats want to overwhelm the media with accusations to see if the can build a case out of bullshit.

All this is basic math. No matter how many zeros you add up, the sum is still zero.

But with media manipulation and democratic desperation to overthrow Kavanaugh, no petty accusation no matter how wrong, adds up to something.

What that something is will be up to the Senate to decide, whether to crucify a man based nothing but a Democratic scam or to give him the seat he deserves, ignoring the ignorant masses who believe zero plus zero plus zero adds up to something.

Democratic Man-haters unite

Tuesday, September 25, 2018

Even as Bill Cosby got sentenced, mean-spirited women ranted and raved on social media, dripping with vindictive blood lust.

This is much like kicking a dog after its dead, needing to get out pent up rage – not just as Cosby either.

There is a sickness spreading through the county as more women seem to join this anti-man club, not just willing to believe misinformation such as the crap Ford and others are spreading about Kavanaugh, but encouraging it, and do their best to spread it – even when they and everybody else knows it is bullshit.

The Kavanaugh attack has nothing to do with sexual improprieties during high school or college, but about abortion and the willingness of this pack of vicious rats to ruin anyone if they disagree with their ability to have unfettered access to it.

Even if the Kavanaugh charges were true – which gauging by the issues and the timing of the attacks, and Ford, who is a hard care abortion advocate – the MeToo vigilante movement has changed the moral landscape so that mistakes made in youth become unforgiveable crimes that earn a man eternal punishment.

This viciousness shows just how unchristian the women’s and liberal movement has become, in which there is no room for the concept of change.

This is much like the scarlet letter on the cheek of promiscuous women in the past, when a sin becomes a permanent judgement and regardless of how much a man grows, changes, learns over a life time, women will want to castrate him for his youth.

This is not Bill Cosby, or the others who clearly have a record of repeated abuses – although women still slather at the mouth even after the legal system has issued punishment – this is about women becoming the god they do not believe in, bearing the ability to condemn any man they hate to eternal torment for a mistake they might have made at some point in the distant past.

This is also about women’s perfect willingness to lie and destroy a man’s life because he dares to believe differently than they do, and to humiliate him and his family (with the help of an equally vicious media) in order to win what is essentially a political battle.

Attacking Cruz in a restaurant in Texas, and the host of other “shaming” incidents shows just how little moral superiority of any kind these movements have. Worse, still, is their being manipulated by the Democratic Party.

These women are arrogant, not stupid, yet are willing to become puppets in a political conflict to a party that is devoid of value, a party that professes to forgive people who are incarcerated, but not people who have lived a clean and moral life, a party that will stop at nothing to gain back power, even willing to crucify an innocent man.

This, of course, started just after the election of Donald Trump, when liberals and Democrats turned into vicious wolves, looking every bit as ruthless as they claim Trumps followers are, kind of projection of their own vicious characters which are hidden like the portrait of Doren Gray from public sight, but is becoming more and more obvious as they grow more and more desperate and despicable.

Avenatti and his pack of stooges

Monday, September 24, 2018

Democrats sink to new lows with the Kavanaugh smear.

Every time I hear Michael Avenatti talk, I have to reach for the hand sanitizer, even though I know you can’t catch something just from listening to a shyster talk.

This is a man who gives ambulance chasing a bad name and so it becomes even more ludicrous to realize that is primary client is an over priced prostitute, and that he makes her living pimping out.

So, hear him rant about how many women he can produce when it comes to smearing Kavanaugh, I have to clean out my ear wax to make sure I actually heard him correctly.

If the politics wasn’t so serious, I would rate Avenatti slightly above a Saturday Night Live skit, more tragic than funny, the way a falling down comic routine is funny and sad.

But the real sadness is that liberals are taking Avenatti seriously, a matter of convenience, because MeToo would much rather trust slime balls than legitimate people, especially when it comes to smearing someone to get what they want.

Avenatti enters stage left because the two women who have tried to smear Kavanaugh are so utterly unbelievable – an orchestrated attack by Democrats like Feinstein and fed through her favorite prostitute of a news organization, The New Yorker.
As it turned out, the third witness recanted her claims even before the vote was taken, something Democrats, Feinstein and The New Yorker knew about, but kept silent over in order to continue to feed this hateful myth some still believe as true. 
I guess people are just too stupid to realize that The New Yorker is a glorified rag, a fanzine for the urban intellectual who love cartoons that make no sense and stories that use big words they have to look up – breaking these stories because nobody actually sees the magazine as remotely objective. The fact is even the most slanted other news media won’t break the story as suspect as this, but will let The New Yorker do it, and then quote it the way slanted CNN is always quoting The Washington Post.

But Avenatti? Really?

We’re not even talking tabloid journalism when it comes to him. He’s the mouth that roar, emitting all kinds of steam, but little brain.

So that he winds up with clients like Stormy Daniels, who made her living on her back until she figured out she could make more through black mail.

And now, she published a book that is likely to get reviewed in The New Yorker which will have to make up the big words she’s too stupid to look up for herself.

The fact that so many women are so desperate to destroy Kavanaugh as to align themselves with Daniels and Avenatti is testimony to the lack of intelligence so called education, upwardly mobile women seem to possess.

You have two women from two parts of Kavanaugh’s life coming forward to claim that he sexually abused them, women who have strong connection to anti-Trump movements, who want more than anything to keep him from the court and are willing to prostitute themselves in much the same way Daniels has to accomplish it.

MeToo has always been questionable, a kind of vigilantism designed to circumvent the legal process to convict people who may not have done anything but are crucified in headlines by a more than willing media.

Why do so many people believe these two women and allow themselves to be aligned with people like Avenatti, whose sole motive is to make as much money for his client and made as many headlines to bolster his career?

When a woman claims a man raped her, she is putting herself on the line, making a claim that ruins a life forever. If she is lying, then she is destroying other women who really have been raped. While we would expect any sort of twisted fact to come out of Avenatti’s forked tongue, but Ford and her latest accomplice are doing a disservice to women who really have been raped. It’s sad, pathetic, and they come off as bad overall as Daniel’s does, only not nearly as honest as she is. We know what her motives are. We know that she will say and do anything to get what she wants. But with the two witnesses, we assume they have some shred of decency – but they don’t.

Soccer moms hate Kavanaugh two more stooges attack him

Sunday, September 23, 2018

Media polls, which are largely slanted by skewed questions, apparently are showing the mid-American Soccer moms are opposed to Kavanaugh being named to the supreme court.

This is media flexing its muscles in its ability to deliver misguided and slanted messages to the public.

A woman named Ford – well known for her anti-Trump and pro-abortion activities – came out with a last-minute accusation against Kavanaugh making unsubstantiated claims of rape.
While Kavanaugh claims he has calendars that show no such party took place, media and Ford have so created the myth of the rape that it is almost impossible to shake it in exchange for truth.

This is the pattern of the MeToo movement that uses headlines to convict people instead of a court of law and allows the Democrats to steer public opinion against a candidate who appears to be extremely upstanding.
Meanwhile, the always corrupt THE NEW YORKER claims to have found another woman and is ready to castrate Kavanaugh -- to make him better resemble the men on its editorial staff.
This latest scoop appears to be focused on Kavanaugh's college years, and the adept misreporters of the world's most elitist magazine appeared to have uncovered another anti-trump, pro-abortion solider to help bolster Ford's weak-assed story.
And to think, with the whole world of journalists and media organizations searching desperately for another witness, it just happens to be -- by some rare coincidence -- that THE NEW YORKER -- with a history of publishing questionably vague literary stories and no history of investigative reporting -- happens to come up with a second witness?
They should not only win the Pulitzer Prize, but the Houdini Award for telepathic reporting.
THE NEW YORKER, of course, represents the worst of the elitist liberal world view and so we automatically expect its pages to be filled with anything anti-middle america.

But when soccer moms turn against you, run!

Nothing better represents the ignorance of public opinion than that pack of beasts who will run you over after schools close in order to get their brats to the soccer fields on time.

It is very scary that judgement on who should sit on the high court is based on unproven accusations and moms who believes whatever media smear they hear on the radio to and from the soccer fields.

This is a brilliant strategy by the Democrats to derail and delay the appointment, not merely until after the midterm elections, but using it as a campaign strategy to scare the GOP or even to unseat enough senators to take control.

Ford – who is a good soldier in this anti-GOP crusade – never meant to be put on the hotseat, even though her husband claimed she wanted to move out of the country if Kavanaugh got appointed. She just wrote a letter gave it to her local anti-Trump congress person, who then passed it onto anti-Trump and pro-abortion Feinstein to be used as a weapon of last resort when all the other smears the Democrats tried were used and failed.

Of course, destroying Kavanaugh’s reputation as a person doesn’t matter when it comes to power grab. Men get falsely accused of sexual misconduct all the time. Sometimes it’s true. But usually people produce witnesses and make their case in court.

Step in MeToo, which doesn’t believe in any criminal justice system – and is willing to crucify a man just by making the accusation.

The question is how much weight MeToo and soccer moms will have on the senators who must choose between honoring their oaths and the law or allowing mob rule fueled by a corrupt media to sway them, and will the GOP get a pair of balls and stand up for what it right rather than what is clearly evil.

And where are all the Sunday afternoon football jocks? Has anyone polled them to see if they agree with the soccer moms? Or is that something that will lead to marital turmoil?

Stay tuned. You know media is licking up every drop of blood in this human tragedy.

Democrats to impeach Thomas and Kavanaugh

Sunday, September 23, 2018

Apparently taking their cue from an old chewing gum commercial about doubling their pleasure, Democrats have developed a back up to derail the GOP’s control of the Supreme Court
Not only do the Democrats intend to use Christine Blasey Ford as an excuse to impeach Kavanaugh if and when the GOP gets balls enough to confirm him, but the Democrats are reinvesting Anita Hill in an attempt to impeach Thomas as well.
Democrats apparently have been keeping Hill like their chewing gum on the bedpost over night in order to hatch this latest plot.
All this, of course, will depend on their ability to retake both houses of Congress, and then convince the public that the questionable charges in both cases have merit.
Democrats may be despairing of stopping Kavanaugh in a traditional way because witnesses to the alleged crime are telling media it most likely never happened, and the smear campaign to bring down Kavanaugh in the eyes of the GOP controlled Senate isn’t working.
Media, of course, has been turning over every stone possible to try to build a smear campaign against Kavanaugh – not only because the Democrats want the GOP to withdraw his name, but also to build a body of headlines that Democrats can use in the mid-term elections.
This has been the Democratic double-bang theory from the start, this collusion between political forces and the media – which has spread out like a virus and has produced negative headline after negative headline Democratic candidates are loading into their campaign literature.
Just how the GOP hopes to inoculate itself against this media driven typhoid Mary campaign remains questionable.
The impeachment strategy also requires the Democrat to clean up Anita Hill and make her into a heroine again – and so to create this illusion that the GOP is putting a bunch of sex perverts on the court.
This is an outgrowth of the MeToo virus that has been plaguing people for several years and subverting the legal system in order to force those accused to prove their innocence rather than accuser to prove guilt.
Again, headlines have turned into media courts where people – mostly men – are convicted before there is any real evidence.
So, expect if the Democrats retake congress for this media show to increase and the Democrats to seek to drive Thomas and Kavanaugh out by impeaching them.

Christine Blasey Ford's strategy for stalling the appointment until after the election

Saturday, September 22, 2018

 Attorneys for Christine Blasey Ford have once more asked the Senate Committee for to delay her having to appear before them to explain why she accused Kavanaugh of attempted rape.

For more than ten days, she stalled going to the committee in order to buy time for the Democrats to manufacture new accusers, claiming she is afraid of flying, even though she had taken extensive trips abroad. Her latest gambit is to force the White House to extend the investigation beyond a week, hoping clearly to stall the nomination until after the November election.
Previously her attorneys claimed that the real reason she doesn’t want to be questioned in front of the judge is because she is fundamentally shy – and would be too embarrassed to go into the details of the alleged rape attempt in front of the man she has already given detailed accounts about to the press.
Of course, this is not the first time Ford has played the delaying game.

A confidential source – which may or may not be the same source feeding The New Yorker and other questionable media – produced a document of future communications that may shed light tactics she used to stall in the past, and may resort to in the future if forced to appear again.

The attorneys apparently have discussed some of these with Ford such as the fact that she overslept or is too tired to get up or forgot something when back home and so by the time she retrieved it was too late to appear and so she needed a postponement.

Most recently, she notified her attorneys that her pet cat, Elmo, got stuck in the toilet and plunging didn’t get it out in a timely fashion.

She also claimed that a bison hit her car in the parking lot, and it took time for the police to get the bison to produce insurance coverage.

Ford also claimed that she ran out of milk for her cereal and had to go find a cow.

She also informed her attorneys that she stayed up late to watch “All the President’s Men,” and could not go to sleep until she found out how it turned out.

Ford also claims that her cat Elmo, once free from the toilet, peeved on her alarm clock, shorted it out, so she failed to get up in time and so had to ask for another postponement.

Apparently after getting to sleep, Ford had a terrible nightmare that nobody believed anything she said, and then when she woke up she found out it was true.

This led to a panic attack and so she forgot everything she and her lawyers rehearsed and when she went back to find the notes that they gave her, she found Elmo had eaten them. So, she needed yet one more postponement. She also believes Elmo absconded with the keys to her car, a plot by the GOP – perhaps even Kavanaugh snuck into her house, or perhaps it was the same imaginary people she claims were threatening her life (She apparently got an email that also threatened Elmo).

All this tension has left her immune system in shambles, and no matter how many pep bills or vitamin supplements, she just can’t get her energy back – she also needed to get a root canal ahead of the hearing, although her lawyers have urged her not to since her being in pain would play well on TV.

Her lawyers have also argued that Ford is still suffering from the after effects of hurricane Maria, even though that was more than a year ago and she was thousands of miles away at the time – the lawyers called it sympathy pains.

Recently, she also needed a postponement because she couldn’t find shoes that matched her outfit – and also needed to find pink clothing to go with the pink hat she wore during one of the women’s marches last year. Her lawyers also suggested she not wear the “Not my president” t-shirt because she might be mistaken for one of those whacko protestors.

The attorneys have informed the Senate Committee that they are certain that Ford will be able to work out these issues at least by election day – although she may come down with a headache if the Democrats win. If that’s the case, she won’t be able to appear until after the Democrats take over the U.S. Senate.

Feds to investigate Lincoln groping Ginsberg

Friday, September 21, 2018

After intensive negotiations with members of the U.S. Senate attorneys representing Ruth Bader Ginsberg will get their wishes. The senate will ask the FBI to investigate the circumstances surrounding the groping claims.

Investigators, however, will be facing the daunting task of finding witnesses to the event since Lincoln has been dead for 150 years, and Ginsberg – while nearly as old – cannot clearly recall the details of the incent, such as where, when and how Lincoln managed to accomplish the outrage.

GOP legislators were at first reluctant to call for a full FBI inquiry partly because Lincoln is a republican and this case could have negative repercussions for the outcome of the midterm elections. Democrats are fuming about the incident and numerous prominent Democratic officials said they believe Ginsberg’s claims, and said they will propose tearing down of the Lincoln Memorial and possibly his bust on Mount Rushmore if the investigation proves Ginsberg’s case.

Some prominent members of the GOP are reluctant to come to Lincoln’s defense, because they are fearful that voters – especially women voters – will come out against them in November.

T-shirts and other paraphernalia have already hit the shelves of local stores and are being ordered from Amazon.com with the logo: Lincoln is not my president.

Some women’s groups, in particular those connected to the MeToo movement are pressing legislators to have Lincoln listed as a sex offender, and propose banning the teaching about Lincoln in schools.

Radical groups have already defaced a number of Lincoln statues, and some protestors have been carrying signs saying: “We wish we could shoot Lincoln again” and “Once was not enough.”

While more reasonable legislators are asking the public to remain calm so that they can evaluate what actually did happen, media has been sniffing through Lincoln’s past for any clue that he might have had a history of sexual misbehavior. Some suspect that he may have actually murdered the one woman who he professed to love as a young man.

The attorneys for Ginsberg have agreed also to allow her to testify before a Senate subcommittee, but only on the condition that senators do not ask her any question that might prove she might be lying.

Women’s groups have already started a gofund me page to help offset Ginsberg’s legal fees, and protestors are already filling the senate gallery chanting: “Lincoln must go.”

Some members of the national GOP appear to be on the verge of distancing themselves from Lincoln. Some are even contemplating changing parties in order to appease the outraged women who have begun a campaign of letters and emails.

Lincoln, however, has remained mum about the charges.

Ford is just the Anita Hill scam with witnesses

Wednesday, September 19, 2018

Leave it to The Hill, the Washington Examiner, and the Washington Post to continue its scummy coverage to the false allegations against the supreme court candidate.
Few low lifes in journalism are pathetic, mean-spirited even evil. But it's hard to expect better from a group of media whores, who learned journalism from watching mickey mouse. 
Yet in this power game, the editorial staff of The Hill barely equals the stupidity of their readers, especially the whackos protesting in favor of Ford and other girl who cried rape.
Yet you have to admit the tenacity of the Democrats for exploiting the arrogance of The Hill and the stupidity of women who will believe anything anybody tells them as long as it is what they agree with in the first place.
 When Democrats come up with a scam, they work it to death, modifying the details in their attempt to seduce the general public into thinking this is a brand new scam.
But the democrats have learned from Hill as The New Yorker's latest parade of pink hats accuse the GOP candidate with additional sex crimes.
At some point, the overkill by The New Yorker will sink in, since it has managed to scoop an entire world and find new witnesses even seasoned reporters with real journalistic credentials couldn't. The fact that the Democrats are feeding this crap through The New Yorker as its primary source suggests that nobody would believe it they did it through CNN, the New York Times or The Washington Post.
You have to wonder if the new witnesses will  make the claim of death threats and insist that they only get interviewed by the senate panel the way Ford did?
I suspect that we are in for a big time show as the Democrats push to prove the GOP has nominated a sex maniac -- as already implied by other questionable articles printed in The New Yorker. All this is a touch straight out of a James Bond movie, adding more than a little high drama for media to play up. 

Yet Anyone who thinks that Christine Blasey Ford is anything other than a Democratic pawn in a high stakes power struggle, then I have a whole shit load of bridges to sell them.
The scam is how to scare GOP senators into canceling or postponing the vote, using media blitz ahead of the 2018 midterm elections.

In truth, nobody is fooled by it at all – except maybe for the reelection-minded GOP senators who are scared to death that if they play this wrong they might lose their seats in November.
This is the reason the Democrats had to pump new life into the Hill story, and find new witnesses, learning from their mistake when they tried to rail road Thomas. Fortunately the for the Democrats Kavenaugh is not a black man like Thomas was, so the GOP can't claim racism. Hill being black helped guard the Democrats when they pulled this stunt the last time.

The latest effort to deny Kavanaugh a seat on the Supreme Court follows a well-established Democratic pattern that dates back to the late 1960s when the democrats derailed the nomination of Judge Haynsworth as punishment to the south for voting Nixon in as president, and then derailed two more before finally giving into some moderate from the north.

While everybody points to the similarities between the current scam and the one against Thomas, these are just the last in this noble tradition of finding stooges to do the Democratic dirty work and give their power grab emotional coverage.

If any of the army of women who sing Ford’s praises for coming forward actually believe it, they are even more deluded that they seem from their marches.

Ford is the way the Democrats hope to delay a nomination to the supreme court, someone whose legal expenses are being picked up from the Dark Lord of the Left, George Soros, who had been the money man behind every protest since Trump was elected, an evil genius who hopes to stop the nomination and then orchestrate a take over of government by the Democrats.

The problem for Democrats is that this latest scam looks too much like the scam they pulled against Thomas three decades ago – although they hoped to ride the whip lash of the MeToo movement in which media helps convict guilty and innocent people through headlines that would have made Pulitzer and Hersh blush.

Democrats have been riding the back of corrupt media for more than two years, and that hasn’t worked either, except to show just how corrupted media has become such as with the recent gaffs CNN made and the outright bias of a story published in the New York Times about this woman’s only witness, who turned out not to be a witness at all, though NBC managed to dig up some former classmate of Fords that seems to recollect something Ford said back in high school.

But like the Toronto Star did to Trump, NBC appears to have hoodwinked this witness so that she walked back her claim later, leaving a lot of questions about what she said on or off the record.
There is no doubt that something happened to Ford, but there is very much reason to question why a hard core anti-Trump woman would launch her attack at the last minute and then refuse to testify until the FBI investigates her claims.
Now, Ford has agreed to come before the senate panel -- pushed to testify no doubt by desperate Democrats who are still seeking to stall the vote, and realize if she doesn't appear, the game is over for them. 
This move comes after it became clear the FBI would not investigate unsubstantiated claims.

That’s not how the system works. Prosecutors need some body of evidence to start an investigation, not so questionable claim that only the already convinced Democrats believe – and not even all of them.

This conviction by headline is designed to scare the GOP into holding up the vote or to intimidate Kavanaugh into withdrawing his name and the stakes are huge.

Democrats are desperate to keep the court from becoming too conservative and it is clear they will stop at nothing, ruin anybody, use even pathetic pawns like Ford to make sure the nomination fails.

One of these deluded Ford supporters even wrote in a tweet, “I was raped once, so Kavanaugh must be guilty.”

The desire to convict him without evidence is more than just wishful thinking by women who hope to keep the court from roe vs wade, but a hateful backlash against men in general.

This desire to impugn him based a fanatic’s claim rivals Palate’s washing his hands and returning the accused back to the mob to be crucified – something that would have been even more pathetic had media been around to do so to Christ.

Time has made it clear just how contrived the Anita Hill accusations were against Thomas, although the same deluded people who believe Ford also defend that charade.

The Democrats and media have even dragged out Hill from the dustpan of history, along with man-hater Gillibrand to shout Ford’s praises.

Hill, of course, failed to give the Democrats what they wanted three decades ago, and so Soros and the Democrats are riding a new horse, desperately hoping they can make this revised scam work in order to grab back power from the GOP.

Soro's funded Fanatic Ford’s failed attack

Wednesday, September 19, 2018

The sad part about Ford and her accusations against Kavanagh it's not the fact that she wore a pink hat and carried a sign saying, “not my president,” typical of the thoughtless masses that have hit the street since Trump's election.
As it turns out, Ford's attorney is a member of George Soros' team. Soros has been the big money behind all of the massive protests -- including the new black uprising and the women's marches. His millions paid for signs, buses and other materials in the so-called spontaneous anti-gun rallies and the campus protests after Trump's election.
The sad part is that there are armies of women just like her willing to believe her without proof in order to bring down a judge they disapprove of and want to stop.

Part of the problem is the relentless anti-Trump media that spreads misinformation and plays up these wacky movements for their own agenda.

More significant is the fact that people now do not rely on facts, do not delve into the truth of what they hear, but accept whatever headlines that supports what they want to believe and then act upon it.

As deluded as Ford was in becoming the good soldier in this campaign to bring down Kavanaugh, she is only a symptom of a more serious problem, a disease that has infected the best educated and a population who should know better.

We live in a time when we have access too much information and yet choose to remain ugly ignorant deliberately seeking out only that which supports are already preconceived notions.

Ford's pink half an anti-Trump sign along with her sneaky behavior leading up to this accusation bodes ill for the truth of what she claimed.

She did not come forward early, yet she took preparations to as if this was a deliberately calculated strategy not much different from the Anita Hill Attack on Thomas three decades ago.

The fact that the Democrats knew this was in the works as early as July and chose to launch the attack through an extremely liberal and elitist magazine to give it credibility suggests that even they did not have confidence in Ford said, but a last-ditch effort to unseat Kavanaugh prior to the vote that would confirm him to the Supreme Court.

The Democrats appeared to think the accusation would shake the GOP's confidence in the judge and perhaps to intimidate him into withdrawing his nomination.

This is called a bluff in poker and fortunately the GOP called that bluff.

And it appears that Ford and the Democrats have decided to fold rather than have their plot exposed.

The Democrats of course we're relying on the me-too movement and the credibility media has given to it over the last year where unsubstantiated claims intimidate people into resignation, or get them fired, or simply ruin their lives.

This is a kind of intimidation, emasculating men and forcing them into submission and in a perverted war between the sexes.

I would like to think people will learn a valuable lesson from Ford. but it's not likely.

While this is The Girl Who Cried Wolf, this will keep going on as long as media keeps giving headlines to scurrilous claims, and a ruthless new feminist movement sees it as a way of gaining power.

The feminist movement that fueled this attack has a bigger game plan lies and deceit do not matter as long as the ultimate goal of regaining power is achieved.

the me-too movement that fuels vicious attacks such as these is based on a historic suffragette movement and the pre-Civil War feminist uprising.

One Southern historian pointed out women's movement in the north is based on hate mostly hatred of men and largely overran other women’s movements based on mutual respect

We are largely watching the women's movement that wants to replace men not have an equal partnership and as long as this power grab is the goal, we will continue to have headlines promoting the girl who cried wolf.

Ford and her followers who will continue to rant and rave even without proof against an establishment they hate and make accusations against people they had without evidence.

Good political soldier Christine Blasey Ford

Good political soldier Christine Blasey Ford

Monday, September 17, 2018

It’s not that I don’t believe something happened to Christine Blasey Ford. But the fact that she never mentioned Kavanaugh by name even when she reported to her therapist in 2012 that she had been accosted in high school, makes me cringe.

We’re in the middle of the biggest political power struggle of our lives, and I would not put it past Ford to lie for the feminist cause and to become a hero of a new resistance movement.

Clearly something happened to this liberal California professor when she was a teen, but the who and what and wherefore is more than suspicious.

Of course, nobody can call her a liar, and dismiss her claims that someone may have tried to rape her. It would help if she had said something at the time, or that she had mentioned Kavanaugh by name – the way more legitimate victims did in regards to Bill Cosby, or that there is some kind of pattern of behavior that is typical of abusers she claims Kavanaugh is.

This last minute bushwhack by the Democrats smells, and the fact that Ford has become the sacrificial lamb who is willing to shed her blood for the noble cause of keeping a conservative off the court also smells.

Ford’s stench hopefully won’t go unnoticed by conservative voters when the midterms come in November, but the with media harping on what is basically an undocumented, last minute accusation raises serious questions about Ford, the Democrats and the process that continues to allow democrats to use MeToo-type tactics to convict people like Kavanaugh without evidence.

This is trial by headline, and the fact that media goes along with it because it has its own political agenda also stinks. But then, we already know how media has corrupted itself, bending over backwards to make unwarranted accusations credible.

According to one Kavanaugh's mother, Martha Kavenaugh, was the presiding judge in a foreclosure case that resulted in the accuser's parents, Marth Ralph Blasey and losing their Maryland home.
This has been disputed by the always slanted Washington Post, although other reports claim that the only witness to the supposed high school incident apparently won't back up Ford's claim.
At least, he won't appear before the senate committee to testify.  He cant' win. If he testifies against Kavenaugh, the GOP will roast his nuts over a fire. If he goes against Ford, Democrats will unleash the full fire and fury of the MeToo movement and his life will become a living hell as media lays siege to his home and job.
All this is clearly a Democratic scam, Ford having launched her campaign back in August when she took up an attorney and tested herself to see if she could survive a lie detector test.
Then, Democrats deliberately withheld her until it became clear none of the other scams they pulled were working. The best touch was having The New Yorker break the letter -- another sign of just how in bed with the Democrats media has become.
None of this is new, and I don't mean the Anita Hill trash from three decades ago. This is standard pattern for the Democrats dating back to the late 1960s when they sabotaged Nixon appointees as revenge against the South, helped get him elected.
But in many ways, it is a rerun of Hill, a manufactured set up puffed up with MeToo which has been getting away with convicting men in headlines, and then convincing women that there is some validity. One twitter post had a woman saying she'd been raped once, which is why Kavenaugh must be guilty.
This is the sad mental state of the viewing public who will buy any crap the Democrats sell through their media partners. So, we can expect a real show.
But thing are changing so rapidly, it is difficult to know which side is scrambling for cover. Kavenaugh's friend, the supposed witness, has since said he has no recollection of the incident Fork claims. Even the god-like Feinstein appears to be wavering, suggesting this may have been a bluff, and the Democrats hoped to scare Kavenaugh to withdraw his name.
Of, course, things could change at any moment, and we might still get to see the circus in which Ford testifies.
I can’t wait for Ford to talk about the pubic hair on the coke can.

Is Woodward lying?

Sunday, September 16, 2018

Woodward new book “Fear” is very similar to all of his other books in that he frames the truth the way he wants to.

The problem in the past is no one could actually check is facts because he used so many unnamed sources.

This is particularly true and is Watergate coverage which has come under heavy scrutiny over the years as more records open up showing how he distorted information and often mischaracterized some of the people he quoted.

He has been accused of literally making up facts for some of his books such as the deathbed confession of CIA director Casey or such as the email exchange he claimed during the Obama Administration in which he was threatened which turned out to be not the case.

Even his editor at The Washington Post, Bradlee had serious reservations about some of his sources such as deep throat and z and the numerous flowerpot incidents that led to underground garage meetings – concerns Woodward attempted to keep from being published.

Woodward's reporting over the years as a journalist has come under serious scrutiny because of the way he spins facts and no matter how many recordings he has of interviews his facts are not in question but the way he spins those, facts refocusing them into a preconceived notion of what he appears to want rather than what actually is.

In his Watergate reporting, for instance, he claimed some high officials had control of funding which as it turned out was simply not true and then he not only doctored quotes from one of his sources, but he implied that that source had access to information that that source did not have.

In most cases it is impossible to check his sources because like the Washington Post and recently the New York Times they use sources that are named and so can't be verified by more objective reporter.

We have to take Woodward's word for the accuracy of these.

Yet even when he gets the facts right he gets the situation wrong clearly spinning his tale the way he wants to see it rather than how's the facts add up.

This became extremely obvious with his biography of John Belushi in which every person he interviewed claimed he miscued the facts often painting things in a dark or light than were absolutely accurate.

There was a famous cafeteria scene in which Bellucci flexed his muscles as a performer and yet Woodward painted this as a lazy and drug-induced when in fact every witness who saw the scene claims Woodward got it completely backwards and clearly was promoting an agenda of an out-of-control Bellucci.

It took another reporter 20 years later and really interviewing all of those people Woodward originally interviewed to show just how skewed a reporting Woodward did.

Baluchi's agent said of Woodward's reporting that if this was an example of his kind of reporting then it is easy to believe Nixon was innocent.

Because this work on Bellucci was so easily verifiable we get a real good glimpse into how Woodward AKA The Washington Post Slants stories.

It is difficult to tell whether Woodward is acting on behalf of some agenda or merely trying to cause trouble the way all of his previous books have often relying on sources that can't be verified and so the tapes won't reveal how skewed he is.

We’re not questioning the fact, but how he frames them and how he selectively picks things to emphasize a particular point when seen in the whole the truth maybe something far different from the way he paints it.

Bellucci biography is a perfect lens into Woodward's style of reporting which is to selectively pick facts and scenes often misinterpreting what those scenes are about and distorting facts to fit what he has a preconceived notion of.  He may have the fact right but may have painted them so that they are exactly the opposite of what the truth is, a kind of fabricated montage of real things that define something that is not real.

Unfortunately, Woodward represents a kind of Journalism that is common today which is to take pieces of a puzzle and put them together in the wrong way so that they say something they want to have said in the first place not what is accurate, spinning a kind of false narrative that we are expected to accept as truth.

Facts don't lie but often the way they put together do and in this case gauging from Woodward's past we have to really seriously question how he put together his latest book and question what his motives are.

Is Feinstein God?

Saturday, September 15, 2018

“I am the Lord thy God, thou shalt have no other gods before me.”

As I said before Feinstein isn't completely responsible for her vicious attack on Kavanaugh. She is simply part of a culture of meanness that goes back more than two centuries, a philosophy of liberalism that has become perverted mean and destructive.

The new left doesn't believe in God because it thinks it is God, and that by having this moral high ground, Feinstein and the left believes it has the right to perform heinous acts and conduct mean-spirited attacks on those it opposes, a God-like power justified by its moral superiority.

In other words, the ends justify the means – even though the result is often the creation of the very social Frankenstein the left claims to oppose.

Feinstein and to some degree Booker follow a somewhat questionable tradition dating back to the pre-civil war abolitionists who were willing to murder 650,000 people in order to force the South to acknowledge their superiority.

Then as now these liberal gods hide their self-righteous self-importance Behind so-called moral issues such as immigrant-rights, women's rights and in the old days slavery and then like a crusade and the Inquisition, do whatever is necessary to force their will on other people.

The political right has often criticized the political left for this concept of entitlement that the constitution gives people more rights than it actually does, and that this misconception of the Constitution has ennobled people to demand things they have not actually earn for themselves.

The new left somewhat differs from the past movements in that we have transitioned out of working-class society where people were expected to earn a living to a new age of middle management where everybody is expected to be getting the same ultimate result despite their personal abilities or lack of.

This may explain part of the new left’s hatred of Western Culture and why someone like Plato is seen as a fascist, since he believed that people were born with certain limitations and that each person must seek a level of success that matches these abilities.

But in contemporary society we do not want to hurt the feelings of people who may be less adept at certain things than others. Everybody gets an award; everybody is a winner; everybody will reach the same level of success even if government has to step in and force the issues. This is a mental shift of cosmic proportions.

So modern society requires that everybody must go to college; everybody must earn a degree; everybody is entitled to a successful future even if what they pursue is unrealistic or beyond their abilities. This is the contemporary vision of equal rights

This is a misconception born out of the struggle to actually get real civil rights and equal chance at success but not guaranteed success.

The abolitionists of the pre-civil war had this vision of slavery as an evil thing and then became the puppets of industrialist who saw slavery as an unfair competition and also wanted to break the back of a monopoly on cotton the South owned. So, there was this moral Crusade to bring down the South to humiliate those who dared to resist and ultimately created the racism that did not exist prior to the Civil War.

This is a self-fulfilling prophecy that if you paint your enemy as evil then you create the evil that you predict even if that evil was myth previously.

The Reconstruction of the South brought on by Radical Republicans and abolitionists created the conditions that led to Jim Crow and other anti-black laws because Radical Republicans and abolitionist were too remote for the southerners to strike back at, and so freed slaves called Freeman became easy targets. So that the massive slaughter of humanity and the destruction of landscape brought on by the Civil War ultimately created the monster worse even than the slavery they thought to end.

We are seeing a similar crusade today one born out of the same illusions and one that will ultimately bring down the same kind of hatred. In this, sometimes well-meaning, but clearly deluded people take on God-like power; forcing their opinions down the throats of other people rather than come to some common ground.

Feinstein and the radical left refuse to believe that other people's opinions are valid on issues like states’ rights or abortion and are willing to destroy anybody's reputation to force their own agenda rather than to seek common ground. And so, they provoke the very evil they profess to oppose such as what happened in Charlottesville, where the passive aggressive left pretended they had moral high ground yet used tactics designed to incur wrath of their opponents. This is the real motivation behind tearing down statues, a kind-of-spitting in the face of those they had and daring their enemies to strike back.

These self-righteous martyrs evoking some superior morality and a god-like power they even deny god.

It is said that the evilest of evil is that evil which hides behind the face of good and Feinstein recent attacks clearly show just how evil she is and the philosophy that supports her.