Jimmy Kimmel as terminator

 Jimmy Kimmel is back like a scene from a bad horror movie in which you can't drive a stake deep enough into the heart to end the movie and so you have to put up with the monster resurrecting itself again and again and again

We all hoped that this man would be contrite but that would not be Jimmy Kimmel iwhose whole life is determined to be a monster at heart someone who is so deeply mean-spirited that he can't find any sympathy for him in any respect and so have to put up with him as being the horror that he really is 

You know all those scenes from the original Terminator in which no matter what you do to save yourself this beast keeps coming after you and it is such a relentless attack that you begin to understand just why people have come to secretly hate this man and fear him because they don't want him turning on them 

Even Jay Leno who was totally screwed over by Kimmel says positive things to avoid being the target of this monster's wrath 

Unlike Hollywood movie however Disney which is almost as monstrous as he is is willing to reinstate him maybe because like the fictional computer network they secretly want him to succeed in their effort to take over and control the world 

Like Terminator there's something inhuman about kimmell something that doesn't have a heart or a soul but just this killer instinct that keeps him coming and coming and nothing will stop him short of a nuclear blast 

In the end of course in a real movie the good guys win but this is not a good guy movie and this is the villain bit in which the villain wins after all 

So don't expect Terminator Kimmel to step off the stage anytime soon he's been reinvigorated has a new computer part in his little brain that tells him that he can keep on doing nasty and despicable things and he will always have the approval of somebody in management who will want to make money over morality 

But don't worry kimmel is a self-destructing little robot and what he does now will be even worse than what he did before because he can't help himself he's programmed to be a mean spirited evil little SOB

King Charles doesn’t care

  

The United Kingdon and Canada decided to recognize the non-existent nation of Palestine, or at least some version they have created in their collective minds.

They may be suffering from collective guilt since they were the same nations that helped create Palestine in the first place, only back then, after the conclusion of World War I, Palestine was a Jewish state, created out of the ruins of Ottoman Empire. Later, when the Arabs sided with the Nazis to help exterminate the Jews in the 1930s and 1940s, it was the United Kingdom that led the charge to create modern day Israel – which is nothing more than renamed Palestine.

The West Bank, the Golen Heights and Gaza – out of which the United Kingdom intends to create the new and artificial Palestine – actually belonged to Syria, Jordan and Egypt, until those countries waged war against Israel, and Israel won. Isreal kept trying to give Gaza back to the Arabs, but every time, it became a launching pad for attacks on Israel – the October 7 event the last in a long series of outrages.

UK and Canada seem to have fallen prey to a corrupt United Nations, whose reports of events in Gaza are so full of factual error you can’t trust them (nearly all of it Hamas propaganda.

This idea of fact verse fiction has never stopped the English from acting.

Hitler was right when he believed the United Kingdom had more in common with the Nazis than it appeared on the surface, a fact that is only now becoming clear with this latest attempt to undo the history UK created in the first place.

This is not to say King Charles is stupid or even misinformed. But English royalty was always a more than little bit arrogant (after all, UK invented the whole concept of white supremacy, which may be why they are bending over backwards to appease terrorists – in much the same way Chamberland did the Nazis.

While ignorant kids on college campuses in our neck of woods might be deluded into believing the phony reports of starvation in Gaza (Hamas hijacking food shipments may well but true), but King Charles clearly knows better and is still steering his country into a new Holocaust against the Jews.

In this, you have to wonder what the English hope to gain, when they are knowingly acting to create a state that has no right to exist, at the expense of a state (Israel) that the UK helped create in the first place.

Is this the UK version of white guilt? Does King Charles feel responsible for the hatch job the British did after World War I when they ignored tribal lines to create phony states and almost guaranteed bloodshed?

Or does King Charles – like his ancient predecessor King George – think he has the right to dictate the fate of nations, when he can’t even dictate the fate of his own pathetic Royal family?

We already know that Canada is UK’s lapdog, a socialist state that follows behind whatever gets said in the UK, with an almost brainless prime minister, who hate America (at least the America that has emerged under Trump)

Still King Charles must know what’s really going on in the middle east and has decided to act as if doesn’t, dragging Canada into the mix.

What does King Charles gain by siding with terrorists? Does he really think peace will come as a result of giving terrorists even more land to attack Israel from? Is King Charles so ignorant of history as to ignore all those other attempts by Arabs to kill Jews?

My guess is King Charles doesn’t care.

 

email to Al Sullivan

Kimmel to do reboot of the Three Stooges

 

Insider reports claim that Jimmy Kimmel – who has been axed from his late night show thanks to his utterly insensitive remarks concerning the death of Charlie Kirk – is in negotiation to get reinstated.

Not only that, this contract could possibly reemploy Steven Colbert and Fallon, even nutty Seth Meyers in a reboot of some Three Stooges classics.

The network was concerned as to whether Kimmel play the role of Moe, and was he sadistic enough to physically abuse him fellow comedians the way he has verbally abused anyone associated with the Republican Party.

But a review of his previous shows demonstrated Kimmel far exceeded the other two comedians in this regard.

Colbert apparently objected to giving the role of Moe to Kimmel and suggested they toss a coin, until someone pointed out that there are three comedians and a coin only has two sides.

Jon Stewart, never one to miss an opportunity to get attention, agreed to play the role of Shemp, if the network wished to have the program include four stooges and not just three, though network officials seemed to think Stewart lacked talent to play the role of any stooge. Most experts agree – with the exception of Jay Leno, who seems to be kissing the others’ asses – none of the four have been funny in the past, and hope that by beating the crap out of each other, they will gets some chuckles from members of the GOP, who would clearly find that entertaining.

Just to be on the safe side, network officials are expected to bring back the old Vaudeville hook, to drag one or more of the trio if and when they go off script and start ranting and raving about Charlie Kirk again, an unlikely scenario considering how contrite Kimmel became after savaging Kirk the first time.

Still, these three (or four if you count Stewart) are perfectly capable of screwing up a good thing, always desperate to make some kind of political statement rather than actually being funny. Despite their rise to power on late night TV, none of these people have talent or ethics to make their political diarrhea sound funny, unlike Charlie Chaplin, in whose shadow none of these three can compare.

Rumors or not, would any network dare to take a chance with these mental giants? Can they be trusted to do slapstick after so many years of lame political jokes.

Of course, there remains the question of how the heirs of the original Three Stooges might feel seeing such pathetic characters parodying the really great comic acts of the past. They could sue to keep the network from allowing such low-life characters like these to play those roles.

If things don’t work out for Kimmel and company, he and they might take up a profession they are truly adept at: Trash collection. After all these year dolling out the crap they call comedy, those three certainly would know what trash sounds like.

 

email to Al Sullivan

Jon Stewart lost his pacifier

 

Jon Stewart is pissed off that nobody has told him to shut up.

So, like a petulant little brat, he’s having a tantrum, telling the world he won’t shut up, on the off chance anyone thinks he’s important enough to bother with.

Steward is clearly upset that other comedians are banned from airwaves for saying stupid things, and so Stewart needs to say stupid things to keep up with them.

He’s the spoil brat at kids’ birthday party that needs to act out in order to get attention, the way he did several years ago when he launched a phony crusade for veterans nobody has heard of since.

In order to get in on the show, this week Stewart came out with a statement saying he would not be censored

Nobody tried to but he felt so ignored by The in crowd that he decided he was going to hold a temper tantrum anyway

This is a kid who obviously when an infant kept having a pacifier shoved in his mouth to keep the crap from coming out

These days, however, he hasn't made any headlines, so he had to make some headlines for himself

The fact is we're better off hearing what comes out of his mouth since it is almost verbatim of some democratic think tank in which has paid his salary for years

But be cautious when it comes to Stewart he will go out of his way to spoil the party unless he’s the center of attention.

You can't hold it against him since he was among the least funny of all of the late-night comedians. He’s a gnat in a world of dinosaurs.

Unfortunately, he's too big to spank

email to Al Sullivan

Kimmel went too far this time

  

Jimmy Kimmel is not stupid; but he thinks his audience is.

Or perhaps, the problem goes far deeper than just stupidity, an arrogance that is extremely Orwellian.

He is so used to manipulating people for so long, selling them false narratives that when it comes to alleged shooter of Charlie Kirk, Kimmel actually believed he could convince the public that black is white – even though the preponderance of evidence showed that the person charged with the crime was deeply involved with the trans community and had distinct left wing leanings.

Kimmel was determined to reshape this character into a Maga stooge, then the alleged killer was a woke stooge instead.

Kimmel has been selling the false woke agenda for so long, he couldn’t possibly stand the idea that someone associated with his political opinion would shoot someone, and so needed to convince the public otherwise.

It’s hard to tell if Kimmel is deluded or this was a deliberate attempt to do what Orwell said all oppressive regimes engage in, misinformation, even when the public has access to the truth.

Kimmel seems to believe he had some magical power to convince people not to believe their own eyes, and rely on him for truth. Stalin would have loved Kimmel, only Kimmel proved too inept to make it work.

But it shows just how indoctrinated in his own woke philosophy Kimmel has become.

A normal person would have painted the would-be killer as just another whacko and moved on, but Kimmel became obsessed with proving things otherwise, and foolishly believed in his god-like ability to dictate a lie as truth.

This has massive implications for the agenda he and others in media have been selling since before Trump’s first term began. If Kimmel lied about this, you have to question what else he and others in media have been lying about – most likely everything, and this threatens to unravel as well orchestrated media campaign against Trump and the GOP, and may well open the eyes of many people who have up to this point taken Kimmel’s misinformation as gospel.

Kimmel can’t help himself. His rage against the GOP won’t allow him to stop and his personal belief that people will accept whatever he says as truth will prevent him from ever coming to grips with his anti-trump disease.

Disney, which is no friend of Trump or the GOP, realized how dangerous Kimmel was to the anti-trump movement and yanked Kimmel off the air before he could do any more damage, not out of any sense of shame for Kimmel having danced on Kirk’s grave.

 

email to Al Sullivan

Banning Christians

  

It is very difficult to tell what the motivation is Abdullah H. Hammoud is in his recent banning of a Christian from his meeting.

It is possible that Hammoud is auditioning to become the new world leader of Hamas and can’t tell the difference between a Christian and Jew.

Or Hammoud may be aching for the glory days of Islam when the Christian Crusades unraveled in the Middle East many long centuries ago.

But clearly the mayor the mayor forgot which country he is elected to and forgets that tolerating descent is what he gets paid for, to listen to his constituents whether he likes them or not.

 To be fair to the Muslim mayor it could be worse he could actually be in Gaza working against the Jews and Christians there

In the United States, there are certain constraints although when you look at what happened to Charlie Kirk, you begin to think maybe mayors like Hammoud would do away with them in order to silence people who have opinions other than their own.

You have to love a country in which people of all faiths can embrace each other in civility, although it may not be wise to allow the mayor access to a rifle of any kind or for that matter, anything thing sharp like an Arabian sword.

Hammoud, however, has decided he is the arbiter of right and wrong, good and evil and is decided that this Christian doesn't deserve to have a voice in his community, thus exposing his own prejudices when it comes to opinions spouted by Christian and Jews – not a bit leap from Nazi Germany which also denied these people a voice.

The worst part is that Hammoud is likely to get reelected since he seems to reflect ill feelings by many of his constituents, who wish not to tolerate people seen as inferior.

Does Hammoud’s dictate go beyond just public meetings, but all of the community events? Will the mayor set up separate bathrooms for Christians and water fountains and will he make Christians sit on the back of buses.

Will Hammoud ban Christians and maybe jews from local lunch counters?

And what other rights will this good mayor curtail in order to uphold his position of power This is not to say he should tolerate misbehavior at the council meetings but certainly he gets paid to hear the complaints and obviously doesn't want to hear it from anybody other than his own group of narrow-minded people

At the end of the day, we are seeing these Petty dictators popping up all over the country, little tyrants who have forgotten why they came to the United States in the first place and what freedom means in regard to other people besides themselves.

Someone needs to wake Hammoud up and remind him where he is or buy him a one-way ticket to Gaza where his kind of behavior is tolerated.

email to Al Sullivan

UnAmerican activities as defined by Jason Crow

 

 Jason Crow, a congressman from the super woke state of Colorado, said it is unAmerican to punish people for cheering on the murder of Charlie Kirk.

This clearly influential Democrat makes a sound case for people who believe killing someone who we disagree with is legitimate.

Crow, no doubt, would not be bothered if people back in June 2020 cheered on the equally horrendous murder of George Floyd. Of course, using this logic, Crow obviously believes that people should not be punished for showing support for the murder of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., John F. Kennedy or his brother, Robert Kennedy.

In this regard, Crow should be crafting legislation to help protect all murderers from unreasonable criticism by anyone, and no doubt, Crow would generously support killers of any kind, killing anyone, as long as those people being murdered happened to be people he personally disagrees with politically.

This may explain why Crow and his democratic cronies do their utmost to make sure criminals get released back on the street, giving them a second chance to repeat their crimes.

Crow most likely would approve of those who cheer on criminals during street crimes. How dare anyone prevent these good citizens from exerting their constitutional right of free speech, even when this means supporting murderers.

Nobody should ever be punished – as long as the victim of the crime is someone Crow disapproves of.

Did we hear peep from Crow when mean spirited people claimed Floyd deserved to die?

Would Crow have protected nasty people who supported Oswald or any of the classic killers of the 1960s.

Crow thinks it’s a person’s right to support such killers.

If only Crow was consistent in his praise of those who praise murder, and would support all the people who cheer on mass murderers. But it is clear, Crow is only supporting those who cheer on the murder of a conservative. But it would clearly be a different case if Crow heard someone cheering on the murder of Floyd.

But it if is unAmerican to punish those who support the murder of Kirk, then it is unAmerican for anyone who supported the murder of MLK.

Is that really what Crow is telling us?

email to Al Sullivan