The FBI raid on Trump home pretty much confirmed what most intelligent people suspected for a long time. We live in a banana republic where those who stole the election in 2020 are not going to see their hard work spoiled by the prospect of an honest election
So, they do what all banana republics do and send in the storm troopers (pardon the mixed metaphor).
Don't expect the US calvary to come to the rescue or media to do anything but sell the party line.
As revelations about Operation Morning glory show intel owns media and has turned it into one big propaganda machine, conspiring yearly with media moguls to decide what kind of horse shit to sell the general public. In fact, many reporters and TV personalities are on Intel payroll giving new meaning to moonlighting. You don't need to know which was are you can tell by their coverage.
The FBI raid however comes as a result of a failed effort by the Jan 6 committee to derail trumps presidential ambitions. (Although the excuse they used was that Trump at classified documents at his home – thus dispelling the accusations made against Hillary Clinton) This is not new. Locally a few years ago the FBI raid a prominent Democrat carrying out of his house empty boxes in order to allow media to imply he was guilty of a crime when he was not.
The FBI also carried out boxes from the Trump estate, and I’m sure none of the agents got a hernia as a result.
With Trump FBI has taken one big step towards becoming a new Gestapo with corrupt media is playing it up in preparation for Trump’s upcoming campaign for president.
Using the FBI in this way is pretty standard practice for the Democrats as well.
The FBI and CIA under the direction Obama and later Clinton have engaged in this kind of behavior before each instance proving to be a deliberate deception.
But as with all banana republics the Democrats and their RINO allies have a limited playbook and appear desperate to derail the Trump train before it rolls over them.
Unfortunately for them the FBI raid will only galvanize Trump support. What scares me is what these desperate power-hungry Democrats might try next when this scam falls by the wayside the way Russiagate did.
CBC is the latest to suspend its twitter operations because
Musk stopped censoring conservatives.
Do liberals think they are accomplishing anything by
censoring themselves?
I learned long ago that nothing CBS has to say has any
value. Its radio stations spew such hate each morning I've turned it off to
find more reliable news outlets.
Yet one likes to keep abreast of the lies the left likes to
invest so CBS Twitter account allowed me to monitor its hate speech rather than
have to rely on those whackadoodles on MSNBC for misinformation.
CBS like many liberals felt comfortable in an environment
where no one challenged their distortion of fact and so leap off the sinking
liberal ship when Twitter restores free speech.
So instead of censoring conservatives CBS has decided to
censor itself
If only CBS would do as much for its other media outlets. Or
better yet start telling the truth.
Unfortunately, CBS does know what truth is and certainly
does believe in free speech
It appears that the Democrats are so terrified of Trump
running for president that they're willing to turn America into a soviet police
state, led by corrupt law enforcers such as Garland and Wray.
The Jan 6 committee started out as a way to distract public
attention that democrats stole the 2020 election but has since turned into a
political tool to keep Trump from running in 2024.
Obviously, the democrats do not feel confident they can
steal another national election. So, they have decided to resort to their older
tactics of inventing crimes they can charge Trump with.
The latest unethical behavior by Garland comes as the Jan 6
committee comes to an end and can no longer sever as ministry of misinformation.
Instead, Garland -- who has no ethics whatsoever -- will
turn his office into a new Gestapo with the sole purpose of stopping Trump.
Even Obama AG, who was a political hack and misused intelligence
agencies to further Obama political aims, never went as far as this.
The only saving grace and potential for real justice is the
fact the GOP will control the house and could create its own Jan 6 committee to
look into how the democrats stole the 2020 election and how to stop Garland
from helping democrats steal the 2024 election as well.
Liberal Democrats are outright lying when they say rich
people don’t pay their fair share of taxes.
While some very wealthy people appear to have managed to reduce
their income tax obligation nearly all of them are paying taxes of other kind
most liberal social justice professors in our universities have not even heard
of, not to mention that the wealthiest in our nation create more jobs than Marxist
universities ever dreamed of.
And yet, we continue to hear this fallacy (even from all
those rich Democratic politicians like Obama and Bernie Sanders) how we need to
go after that 2 percent of the population that controls 90 percent of the nation’s
wealth.
Even this last statistic is a lie, since by control, they
fail to mention these wealthy people generate jobs and control production of
necessary goods and services.
This is why the Trump tax cut made sense, allowing more money
to flow into those companies that actually provide jobs for people.
But it is clear that much of this is hatred for the wealthy
is coming out of Marxist social justice groups who perhaps are jealous that
they are not one of the two percent, or more likely, are seeking to live up to
the Marxist dream of proletariat revolution, and as the old 1960s rock song goes,
“tax the rich until they’re rich no more.”
Biden’s whole tax plan (as well as tax plans in many liberal
states like New Jersey and California) are based on taxing the rich to death,
only as George Orwell, a well-known socialist writer, point out, it won’t work.
“If you tax all the large incomes out of existence it would
still not make much of a difference to the taxes the rest of us would have to
pay,” Orwell wrote. “The common people receive most of the national
income just as they eat most of the food and wear out most of the clothes
because they constitute the enormous majority.”
Some of the fallacies of the fight Administration deal with
Concept that you can tax the rich and make up for all of the bills that you pay
they're just not enough rich to do that. This means that the common
people will still have to pay the bulk of the taxes and is the reason why the
Biden Administration hired 87,000 new IRS agents and gave them guns.
If you truly believe these agents are going only after the
super rich, then I have several bridges to sell you.
Like everything else Biden has come up with lately, this is a
script being written by a Marxist brain trust that is desperate for 1917-type
revolution by the proletariat that will establish a socialist state.
Orwell also points out that in countries like England and
America that preliterate no longer exists. We are a nation of clerks, not a nation
of coal miners, and our population is not the underclass that Marx envisioned.
Our kids are middle class, and even our poorest people – including the massive
number of homeless in places like California – are the richest poor people on
the planet.
For the most part, those that the Marxists are trying to incite
to riot are middle class or on their way to being middle class, especially in
some of the ethnic communities such as Muslims, Latinos, Asians and even
blacks.
This is a problem for Democrats, who have created a Marist
slave state in which poor people are dependent on Democrat-run social services.
As people move up the social ladder, Democrats have fewer people depending on
them, and Marxists have fewer people to incite to riot.
This may explain why we have an open border with Mexico, as
Democrats need to import more poor people to live up to their Marxist wet dreams.
One by one they paraded up to the microphone to lecture us,
all wearing face masks , the contemporary symbol for social justice warrior
without which they would feel utterly exposed, hiding their identity even as
they muffled their name, each carrying their litany of issue that define their
generation: Climate change, Abortion, gay right, anti-police, anti-Trump, learning
these things from their liberal professors at college the way Catholics learned
their faith from catechism, almost of all of them heavy with white guilt,
bearing for a sympathy for people of color many of them never actually met,
carrying these things into the wide world as if a crusade.
Tonight, they came to crucify someone, bearing witness
against someone they believed did wrong and must be forced out of office, even
before the legal process has expired, a kind of mob mentality typical of the
middle ages when their kind judged and burned witches, each a self-centered, self-righteous
know it all, preaching at the legislators as if on a mission from a god know of
them profess to believe in, so full of themselves they don’t even cringe when
they hear themselves speak, most living a life of luxury few of the down and
out they profess to speak for could imagine, unbearable arrogant as if to say
those to whom they lecture could not possibly know as much as they do, and need
to be instructed on how to live their lives, each bringing their own judge and
jury of one to the podium needing only the hanging noose to reveal them as the lynch
mob they really are, a vindictive, judgmental pack of spoiled brats who have
come to pass judgment on their victim, tossing around the word “trump” as a vindictive,
the latest curse word of the z-generation the way our generation used the word “Nixon,”
and equally dishonest.
The victim was only one more excuse for protest since these
same faces – if you could make them out behind their masks – were the same
faces that came out for every protest, filling the street in front of City Hall
or the pedestrian plaza, carrying slogans they got from their comrades off the
internet, full of fury and rage at a system they see as systemically racist,
even when it isn’t, they act as if it is, and army of zombies so indoctrinated
as to have stopped thinking, having learned everything they need to know in
college except for the ability to think for themselves, each repeating what the
previous speaker has said, as if saying a rosary (all of whom thinks as racist
as well), spouting political rhetoric that is so full of hate it is the verbal
version of a whip, each striking the back on their victim with the hope they
can get the victim to squeal or confess, or do what they demand, many complaining
that they can not strike these blows remotely, inconvenienced by the fact they
actually have to show up in person to do their evil deeds, when so many of
their comrades are too lazy to make the trek, and so sit home pouting, unable
to push a button or send a hateful message while sitting on their couch.
A year and a half after Biden took office as president,
somebody in the White House and the justice department noticed nuclear secrets were
missing.
This week, the FBI rooted through Donald Trump’s underwear
drawer in an attempt to recover them.
You would think that the justice department with all of its
resources would have noticed something sooner rather than wait ahead of the
mid-term election to resurrect the old Hillary Clinton email scam.
Good old Merrick Garland decided the time was ripe to
searched Trump’s drawers for these suddenly urgently needed documents.
All this of course comes as the poll numbers start showing
Trump’s lead growing as candidate the 2024 election and that the GOP is headed
for what they hope will be a red sweep this November.
Obviously, pure coincidence since Garland has demonstrated
his clear dedication to serving his country and keeping his political allegiance
to the Democratic Party on the back burner.
Still, you have to wonder why Garland did not notice the missing
documents sooner and why he sought out a judge connected with the Hillary
Clinton campaign to authorize a storm-trooper like invasion of Trump’s Florida home.
Some snitch apparently told Garland that these secrets could
be found mingled with Trump’s wife’s underwear.
This course comes at a time when the January 6th committee
failed to come to any conclusive finding about Trump in the protest so there is
obvious speed to notch up the rhetoric and polish off the old Russian Collusion
scam with a little flavoring of the Hillary Clinton email scandal.
Democrats may be ruthless in their pursuit of injustice, but
nobody can question their lack of creativity.
Politics like comedy is all about timing and this timing of
this raid on Trump's Florida home smells like bad fish left it a refugee boat
for 2 weeks and high heat
Once more we are getting to see just how corrupt Garland is
when it comes to listening to his masters in the Democratic Party. He will do
or say anything just to make sure Trump is not the nominee in 2024
This is done so heavy-handedly that we need to change the
name of the justice department to something more accurate like the department
of Injustice.
Every day we are seeing how much more Garland is a henchman
for the Democratic Party and reacting to their commands. He was under immense pressure
to charge Trump in relationship to the January 6th protest. But even he could
see just what a sham the committee was and how little proof the hearings
actually produced.
So, instead he comes up with the scam of an investigation that
not only seeks to recover documents he and Trump were already in discussions to
retrieve but gave the perverts in the FBI the opportunity to sniff Trump’s wife’s
underwear while they were at it.
As with all the previous Democratic scams, this is misuse of
the justice department. The use of a federal judge with strong ties to Hillary
Clinton smacks of criminal entrapment.
This brings Garland that much closer to accusations of
criminal behavior by use of the FBI as his personal gestapo.
Democratic voters and corrupt left-wing media will eat this up,
buying this snake oil the way motorist buy gasoline with the real cost the
total lack of justice
Garland is nothing more than an attack dog for democrats but
a very stupid attack dog at that.
It's really horrible that the two most powerful law enforcement
people in the country are suffering through death threats,
Christopher Wray and Merrick Garland deserve our respect not
our abuse, regardless of how incompetent or corrupt they are.
We must sympathize with them because they clearly have sold
their souls to the devil and are destined to spend an eternity burning in the
depths of hell.
We really should admire Garland, who does Biden’s dirty work
the way any good Nazi would in the foregone days of the Third Reich. And he deserves
even more respect for protecting his son who sells CRT to schools from those
terrorist parents who would deprive his family of that desperately needed
income.
We also have to admire Wray for his fortitude in continuing
to promote the already debunked Russian Collusion theory and his undying loyalty
to Hillary Clinton whose campaign invented the theory in the first placed.
We must feel pangs of regret for how these two helpless
characters have been abused by all those mean people on the internet that seem
to have some problem with these two misusing their authority?
How dare the public want accountability from corrupt
officials like them!!!!
And our heart should go out to them regardless of how they
have abused the legal system to bring down Donald Trump, hiding their
intentions behind the rule of law, going to a judge they know is a corrupt as
they are in order to get legal justification to sniff through the former
president’s underwear drawer.
These hapless law enforcement czars are now whining to
liberal media about how they are victims, and we should believe them regardless
of their records of abusing their authority.
They are clearly part of some oppressed minority who can
kick down people's doors and root through underwear drawers in their vigilant
pursuit of in justice.
We need to print up t shirts with their names and pictures.
We need to take to the street with signs protesting about how unfairly they've
been treated -- these complete pussies of law enforcement who terrorize other
people but hide under the bed when ordinary people who have not the power of
God say awful things about them.
Of course, they must really feel threatened by all the
stupid people making death threats against them, since these two men have all
the power of God to find and prosecute those who do.
If these two very gestapo like figures are capable of
raiding a former president's house, how much more ruthless can they be when it
comes to pursuing some idiot on the internet sending them of death threat?
But fear not you can be sure the FBI will soon be kicking
down the doors of those mean-spirited people who need to hide their underwear
from them.
Old school date
night was a nightmare back when there were only two genders to worry about.
A guy shows up,
then waits as the gal fusses about what dress to wear, what color lip stick,
how to wear her hair.
These days of
gender fluidity you don't even know if it will be a girl or boy or something
unaffiliated that walks down the stairs when you get there.
Gay relations
made great changes to the dating scene after Stone Wall Inn riot in 1969. But at least you knew the gender of the person
you made a date with would be the same gender as the one you met when you
arrived.
Of course, this
gets infinitely more complex if both parties in this arrangement are fluid.
What if both
decide they wanna be boys that night or girls? What happens if their outfits
clash? And who is responsible to pay the tab for dinner? And who is responsible
to bring the dildos?
God help us all
if they want to get kinky. Will there be arguments over which one is submissive?
There is the
dreadful disappointment it the expectant partner when his or her date decides
to be unaffiliated or worse decides he or she is a cat or dog or even a pet
rock and you mistakenly bring flowers and candy instead of cat or dog treats.
What if in mid
date your partner changes his or her mind? Who then gets to lead on the dance
floor?
Or even changes
his or her mind in the middle of sex and starts meowing!
And if your
partner bites or scratches you at the height of passion, will you need to get
shots for rabis
or distemper?
What about the
good night kiss when you take him or her home as a different gender than when
you left, and you don't happen to be gay at that moment he or she identifies as
the same gender as you?
Hopefully
someone will soon come up with a guide for dating.
The real sad part of the conflict over the burn pit
legislation is belief that Jon Stewart is the veterans' friend.
Jon Stewart is a front man for a democratic money scam. A not
so pretty celebrity face who is selling snake oil on behalf of the democrats.
On the surface the bill provides a very needed service to
former military personnel, giving them sorely needed relief for injuries they
suffered in combat
But as with most thing democrats propose, it is actually a
Trojan horse money scam with an insidious aim to scam vets away from voting
republican in November.
To begin with the bill is funded as an entitlement. This
means it never again gets reviewed and voted on by congress in the future,
regardless of how ineffective the program might be or how finds are misused.
This could have been funded in the annual budget subject to
an annual review.
Secondly it includes $400 million in unexplained
discretionary money that can be used any which way the bureaucrats want. The Republicans
know this, but many gullible democratic supporters and needy vets don't.
Most likely democrats couldn't care less if the bill passed
as long as GOP opposition to the money grab gets vets pissed off enough to vote
against the GOP in November
Jon Stewart is being portrayed as a hero rather than the heel
he is, a front man for this Democratic con game.
He is no hero for vets’ rights. He is and has always been a
proponent of woke but may well get an academy award for promoting this con job
and selling veterans short by promoting a democratic scam
You have to admire how well Liz Cheney has worked to uphold
her family tradition
Her father, Dick Cheney, was well recognized as one of the evilest
men in American politics -- first serving as a kind of political hit man in the
Reagan administration then later as the puppet master manipulating President Bush
as vice president.
Liz Cheney’s role on the January 6th Committee demonstrates
just how well she learned the skills of a political hit man from her father,
learning how to cheat, steal, lie or perform any other ruthless acts in order
to achieve her political ends
Cheney is the contemporary version of Watergate’s John Dean
who was a sniveling little coward hoping in bed with Democrats against Nixon to
save his own miserable skin.
Cheney has slithered into the same democratic snake pit in
order to save her political career. She honestly believes somehow democrats
will be grateful to her for helping them bring down Donald Trump.
But she obviously did not inherit her father's intelligence
when she did his utter ruthlessness.
The January 6th Committee started out as a way for democrats
to distract public attention from their stealing an election and has evolved
into a soviet like trial to convict Trump of a phony insurrection.
This is a trial conducted by biased democrats and RINOs like
Cheney but no defense attorneys for those being accused. No cross examination.
No alternate witnesses. The only witnesses are those handpicked by the
democrats who are determined to make Trump into a modern-day Robert E Lee so
that they can evoke the 14th amendment to prevent Trump from running for
president in 2024.
It is a disparate ploy, but one fully supported by a corrupt
media upon which the general public depends for information.
Cheney meanwhile has become leader of this lynch mob even
when it us clear when all is said and done democrats will have as little use
for her as legitimate Republicans do now.
New York Times came out with a story embracing cannibalism
as if this is something new when it comes to American media.
News has been eating its human kind for centuries and never so
more so than today.
Of course, violating the most sacrosanct rule of humanity
may be a merely a ploy to make up for lost readership by adopting the antics of
the National Enquirer.
But it may well already be an established fact: the primary
activity of modern media is to devour human flesh as its recent coverage of the
January 6th committee shows.
Media how tends to sacrifice its political enemies as
subsidence with scathing headlines helping them to drink other people's blood
in order to survive.
The New York Times, however, went far beyond its usual
vulture-like feeding habits to suggest it might turn the rest of humanity in
the parasites previously exclusive to media.
This was no satire created by a noble writer such as
Jonathan Swift but the ranting of a lunatic staff writer typical of the kind of
journalist media has let loose on the world, a serious proposal by a sick and depraved
New York Times editorial staff that has run out of other norms to violate.
Unfortunately, the New York Times didn't even have the human
decency to offer themselves up as a possible solution to world hunger.We have such an excess of useless media; we
might be able to feed the world for a year if humanity doesn't run out of
antacid first from devouring such rancid meat.
This would have the added benefit of significantly reducing
the world's carbon foot print by halting the most significant source of
poisonous hot air. If people thought cows polluted at least they generally
pollute only out of one orifice whereas journalists pollute out of every pour.
Eventually, of course, we will regretfully run out of
journalists to skewer over the open fire. But we many never run out of
pontificating pompous self-righteous professors for which there will never be a
shortage if you can stand the unbearable taste.
Berkeley professor Khiara Bridges is mentally ill.
But she’s not alone. She has a not-so rare form of insanity
that is apparently more contagious than covid and twice as deadly.
She testified during the Senate hearing on reproductive care in a
post-Roe America and accused Sen. Josh Hawley of being "transphobic"
when he asked her how she thought men could have bear babies.
Bridges resorted the typical liberal trick of attacking Hawley
when he challenged her agenda as well as her common sense. She resorted to name
calling.
It is not transphobic to claim women have babied and men don’t,
regardless of how many hormones men might ingest or even how much surgery.
Reality is not a strong point when it comes to liberals like
Bridges, nor is common sense.
Bridges came to the hearing selling an agenda and got push
back when the agenda defied veracity.
We live in strange times where men want to be women and women
men.
Yet it is not a new concept.
Penis envy – although not always identify in that term – has existed
since the dawn of time, women coveting men’s phallic power while men jealously
envied women’s ability to propriate – women’s magical power to create life.
Men have always desired this power, even when women recklessly
abuse it through acts like abortion.
What isn’t nature, however, is the lunatic notion that men
can actually bear babies.
Perhaps as science advances, it may be made possible in the
future. But at this moment in time, it is a pathetic fantasy, that liberals
like Bridges cling to the way old Christians used to cling to the concept of a
flat earth.
Society has moved away from merely wishing for the impossible
to pretending it is possible, a wizard of oz effect that if you click your heals
and wish real hard it will come true.
This is the logic of immature minds, regardless of how many university
degrees that person possesses or which prestigious university in which she
happens to teach.
There is no doubt that some people are gay, although just
when this occurs in the human anatomy remains a mystery since some otherwise
straight people have gone through an experimental phase when young (often
associated with puberty) and then later decide as adults they are not.
This, however, differs significantly from being transgender
and whether or not that person was miscategorized at birth and given the wrong
label.
There is some legitimate argument as far as gender
assignment, especially when an infant is born with multiple organs and the
doctors make the choice as to which gender, he or she should become.
But the massive increase in transgender identification –
especially among Gen z – indicates more of a fad than fact, kids who might have
felt socially excluded from the various social clicks find acceptance and
welcoming in the transgender community.
Since kids are impressionable at an early age, teachers’ grooming
them becomes an even more dangerous trend, since as authorities figures these
questionable teachers have a huge influence on their yet to develop minds and
steering these kids become something that is basically criminal.
Kids need to sort it out for themselves, which is why there
are laws governing age of consent. We do not expect young people to make
serious decisions when they are not mature enough to fully understand the implications.
All that said, there are only two physical sexes, regardless
of what the overly educated Bridges might maintain, and only one of these is physically
capable of bearing children. To say otherwise, even from the mouth of a clearly
deluded professor, is not just dishonest, it is flatly crazy.
From the way New York City prosecutor, Alvin Bragg embraces
the criminal element, you would think Bragg has his underwear on too tight, so,
it is cutting circulation off to his brain.
Who else in their right mind would jail the victim in an
obvious robbery attempt, prosecuting the store owner for murdering someone who
had just tried to kill him?
Putting honest citizens in jail while letting out serial
offenders seems the act of a crazy man. And clearly it is.
But we can’t completely blame Bragg for these acts of
madness. He has caught a disease which scrambles people’s brains and makes right
look like wrong, and sinners look like saints.
Bragg isn’t the only such suffer. Liberal prosecutors across
the country have also caught this nasty bug, trying to sell the public on the
notion that criminals are victims of society and that racism and other factors
have turned them into the thugs and murders they are, and that it is up to
prosecutors like Bragg to help make amends by letting such vicious characters
loose on the world to get reparations from the while people who engage in institutional
racism.
Bragg clearly has caught this bug worse than others,
although the son of 1960s bomb throwing weather underground radical Kathy Boudin,
seems as infected as Bragg. Fortunately, California has a recall ability and
used it to toss the perverted Boudin out of office before he could abuse more
crime victims by letting even more thugs out of jail.
New York, however, does not allow voters to act on their
own, forcing people to plead with the sitting governor to get rid of radical
prosecutors like Bragg. Unfortunately, the sitting governor is nearly as
radical as Bragg is, part of that anti-white establishment that wants to transplant
whites with people of color, regardless of their abilities or their inclination
towards crime.
Some people might well feel sorry for Bragg for how much
radical professors in college inflicted their twisted logic on him, a pathetic
case which clearly has no cure, and must be dumped out of office and put
somewhere (perhaps in a straight jacket) where he can do no more harm.
This, of course, will require a new governor, and
fortunately there is an election coming up.
The problem is: how many more people can Bragg hurt before
the new governor is sworn in, and how many more hardened criminals will he let
loose into unsuspecting society?
Another day, another mass shooting, and another culprit the
police failed to do anything about when there was plenty of warning.
The shooting inspired the Democrats to scream more about
limiting gun sales, when each shooting like this only inspires ordinary people
to buy more guns because the system, we would have to rely on to protect us
(and which the Democrats would have us depend on) is broken.
The FBI is completely useless, more interested in going
after parents who protest against the teaching of critical race theory than
going after people who actually post a threat.
Local police – as several incidents recent – are either too
scared, too equipped or too bureaucratic to actually do their job.
Many of the shooters are teens with serious mental health
problems, and an underfunded and ill-educated mental health system. Teachers,
who might be the first alert to these troubled teens, appear to be more
interested in grooming the next generation of transgender kids or stoking up
racial hate in the classroom.
So, what’s the answer? Few guns?
School safety is easy. We just don’t do what is necessary to
protect them. Security in airports is a good model for school safety since
there hasn’t been a serious incident in air traffic since 9/11 and nearly 20
years prior to that.
Protecting a parade is more difficult, although Times Square
on New Year’s Day is a good model, allowing people into a confined area after
their bags have been checked.
But ultimately, government needs to invest more in mental health,
and to set up a better system of red flags – not for guns, but for potentially dangerous,
since almost everyone of these crazies was on the public safety radar prior to
these mass murders.
The fact is, even if you eliminate guns the way the liberals
would have it, the danger remains. You can kill just as many people by mowing
them down in a car (even if the car is electric), and as New York City subways
have recently shown, knives can be a very effective means of killing people in enclosed
spaces.
If someone is as whacky as the most recent shooter was, then
the system needs to act when there are obvious signs. You’re not going to get
rid of legal guns (no matter how large the magazine) if the cops won’t take
their guns out of their holsters when the shooting stops.
Private citizens will buy more guns to protect themselves when
they believe the police won’t.
But investing in police isn’t a popular philosophy among
Democrats these days, who believe every person of any color behind the badge is
racist. Cutting police budgets because of some imaginary systemic racist fantasy
doesn’t protect people – although if you believe the Democratic extremists,
cops are only there to protect rich white people and their wealth. Tell that to
the victims in the schools and streets, many of whom aren’t white or rich.
Democrats – with the help of RINOs like Liz Cheney – are desperate
to turn the Jan. 6 protest into an insurrection.
And for good reason (at least in their minds).
January 6 was not an insurrection by any means, legally or by
any other means.
Provoked by agitators from left wing Antifa and BLM, some of
the protesters got a bit out of control. But no worse than any of the left wing
protests from the 1960s such as at Columbia University – which Jan. 6 resembles
– when left wing radicals stormed the college, took over the offices, and one radical
(a one time close friend of mine) was photographed by The New York Times
sitting in the college presidents desk, smoking one of the college president’s
cigars.
Photographs from the Columbia University take over so resemble
the Jan. 6 protest, they could substitute for each other with most people being
unable to tell the difference.
The Jan. 6 committee was deliberately developed to sell the
idea of insurrection – refusing to accept any Republicans on the committee except
those handpicked by the Democrats (RINOs like Liz Cheney).
The committee’s sole purpose is to create the illusion of an
insurrection and blame Trump for orchestrating it.
There is method to this madness. By manufacturing phony
witnesses, getting people to lie under oath, and to build a false case against
Truth, the committee (and the Democrats) hope to invoke the 14th amendment that
prohibits anyone involved in an insurrection from holding elected office.
The problem for the Jan 6 Committee, the democrats and their
corrupt media, Jan. 6 does not meet the definition of an insurrection.
But this won’t stop media from promoting it as one, in an
attempt to get GOP voters to abandon Trump in favor of a GOP candidate the
Democrats think they can beat.
How long the farce of the Jan. 6 Committee continues is
anybody’s guess. It’s predecessor, The House of Un-American Activities, went on
for almost a decade and destroyed thousands of people’s lives. You can expect
the Jan. 6 Committee to ruin reputations and do anything else underhanded to try
to derail the Trump reelection.
The question remains how long before a real court with a
real judge throws out the Committee’s complaint and whether or not Garland, the
Democratic hit man, will be willing to risk his career to support conclusions
made by dishonest witnesses.
And if this attempt to subvert the use of the 14th Amendment
fails, will Democrats return to the tried-and-true method for winning in 2024,
stealing another election?
Liberal media is desperate to rescue their chief and most
unreliable witness for the shit show blatantly called the Jan. 6 committee. And many GOP people are panicking rather than
fighting back, looking to jump ship in order to avoid becoming a target
themselves.
The most recent effort by media is an effort to save their
witness by sewing confusion when it comes to what the Trump did with the Secret
Service in the lead up to the Jan. 6 protest.
While some secret service agents claim the Jan. 6 witness
lied, media has come up with unnamed sources that claim differently, creating a
fictional theory of good secret service agents and those who are loyal to Trump.
Media completely ignores the fact that it was physically
impossible for Trump to have grabbed the steering wheel as the Jan. 6 witness
claims someone told her he had.
The Jan. 6 committee is notorious at passing fiction off as
fact and this is no exception.
The committee’s whole function is scare the hell out of
Trump’s support in the GOP and get these somewhat less than RINOs to abandoned him
for a candidate the Democrats think they can beat in the 2024 election, when
polls say Democrats do not stand a chance against Trump unless they steal that
election, too.
While it is very likely someone like that scumbag Garland
will indict Trump on these trumped-up charges, the accusations won’t hold up in
court when the Jan. 6 committee’s witnesses get cross examined and their so-called
facts are questioned. Such as trial will amount to the Russian Collusion hoax
and the two failed attempts to impeach Trump.
But it may be enough to panic Trump’s GOP support, which is
why the Democrats and media are selling this horseshit as fact.
If you are a Trump supporter, understand mainstream GOP is
not your friend.
Most of the GOP are just as much swamp-dwellers as the
Democrats are, pond scum that needs the swamp to survive, willing to trade off
with the Democrats in order to get their share of the political pie.
While George W. Bush and Dick Cheney his evil guru aren’t
quite RINOs the way Liz Cheney turned out to be, they were too stupid – like most
of the GOP – to see what Barrack Obama changed the rules of the game when he
attempted to hand over reigns of power to Hillary Clinton.
Democrats intended to keep hold of power, despite previous
arrangements. Fortunately, Trump upset their apple cart, which is why they needed
to steal an election in 2020 and are desperate to get Trump out of the running
in 2024.
The GOP ignorantly presumes if they support this effort,
they can get back to doing business as usual with the Democrats when they can’t.
Trump is a populist and like all populists before him is
hated equally by both mainstream parties because he can’t be relied on to play
the game. The GOP is scared because Trump really means it when he says he wants
to drain the swamp and flush all the would-be Liz Cheneys down the toilet with
the rest of the crap.
Stopping Trump is the whole reason the Jan. 6 committee was
invented – not to seek justice but to hang an albatross of lies around his neck
to keep him from running for president again.
This wink and nod arrangement between the GOP and Democrats
is the reason why publications like The Washington Examiner and the National
Review are supporting the Jan. 6 committee – after all, these like Fox and
other so-called conservative publications rely on the swamp for their survival,
too, acting as the loyal opposition to the Democrats without actually opposing
anything the Democrats actually do.
Fortunately, or unfortunately, the Jan. 6 Committee is
illegal, and will have its rulings overturned the minute their accusations arrive
in any legitimate court where witnesses can be cross examined, and testimony
debunked.
But the purpose of the committee is not legal, it is a
publicity stunt, to generate enough negative headlines to cow the GOP into giving
up on Trump, a brilliant move that relies on the GOP’s stupid notion that if
they abandon Trump, they will ever have a rat’s chance in hell of regaining
power.
Liberal males are castrating themselves at record numbers,
according a report this week.
The latest patch comes as a result of the US Supreme Court’s
decision to restore abortion regulations to the states.
These mostly urban males are seeking vasectomies apparently to
satisfy the demands of their female friends, thus doing away with the need to
engage in protected sex.
This batch of self-castrating males follows a recent trend in
which other males are castrating themselves in the transgender movement.
While we hear the howl of conservatives about how bad this
is, these trends actual bode well for the future by removing from the national gene
pool the liberal (some call it the pussy-whipped) gene and promises to restore
a strong male gene pool for the future.
This will take time, of course, since population changes
slowly, and there is no guarantee that all the liberals will go as far as to
castrate themselves, regardless of the current fashion.
And many of the castrated males may well live on for a long
time as modern day eunuch, acting out their annoying sexual fantasies for the
foreseeable future.
The trend for castration does not deal with the dominant woman
syndrome which is partly behind these castrations, men unable to compete in the
world give up, surrender their masculinity and leave powerful women to direct
them – even to the demise of their masculine species.
Fortunately, this trend tends to be concentrated in liberal
urban areas and on both coasts, where the inevitable decline of the male species
will force dominant females to seek out other means to continue their gene pool
– although with places like New York and California allowing abortions right up
to the day of birth, we might well see the total decline of liberals both male,
female and everything in between.
The great hope for American mankind is to keep this trend from
spreading into the heart land where real men and women still exist, and the Supreme
Court decision goes a long way to preventing this, as long as liberals are
prevented from doing away with the filibuster or stacking a supreme court with
castrated men and dominant women.
This is all about saving the human race from extinction.
My mother always made me divert my eyes when we passed that
doctor’s office on Lakeview Avenue in Paterson years ago.
I didn’t know why then, a secret my mother kept nearly to
her grave, about her cousin and best friend Kitty who had gone there to get rid
of a problem she could not or would not solve by marriage.
Where Kitty got the money, my mother never said. But Kitty
was a popular girl and if the sugar daddy that created the problem wouldn’t pay
for its solution, then one of her other sugar daddies would.
The small estate testified to that doctor’s success; large
urn-like planters situated on either side of the long walk that led up to the
front door.
Even back then in the late 1940s when Kitty’s event
transpired, doctors like this made their side money off spoiled girls who got
themselves in trouble and expected their parents to pay to get them out of it.
Poorer neighborhoods had less prestigious doctors to do it,
or even underpaid interns from the local hospitals looking to pick up an extra
buck or two for their service.
The really poor or really desperate found cheaper, riskier
means to get rid of their shame, dumping the results in some nearby trash bin
as they staggered home lucky not to bleed to death along the way.
Unlike many of the spoiled kids from nearby towns, Kitty
wasn’t rich, but managed to get enough to hire this butcher, and made my mother
keep her secret, and my mother did, long after Kitty probably forgot about it
herself, my mother not even divulging it to the priest in confession, carrying
this mortal sin inside her until it drove her crazy, struggling perhaps with
the vague thought of how she might solve her problem when her time came, after
her bastard of a husband first took off, leaving her alone and pregnant, a
notion that if carried out might have ended my existence before it began.
Years later, society gave up this unspoken side profession
with Roe vs Wade, when modern technology and equally unethical doctors,
employed an assembly line approach to help women eliminate the problem all
their wrong decisions got them into in the first place. So efficient was this
new technique these butchers could later sell the body parts of the unborn to
help deal with their bottom line, turning the whole affair into little more
than a tooth extraction.
To make themselves feel less guilty, these women and doctors
created a whole variety of myths to justify their actions, it isn’t life they
were removing, or that a woman might risk her own life if the doctors did not
perform the action. Many of these myths claim a woman should not bear a child
born out of rape or incest, nor should a predictably deformed child be brought
into world, or that it is cruel to bring a child into the world without hope of
adoption.
Unfortunately, these account for about 8 percent of all the
abortions in the United States, all the rest are elective, meaning that some
woman decided that a baby does not fit into her life style or the relationship
out of which the pregnancy came didn’t quite work out as planned, or rage at
the father made the woman terminate the birth. In many cases, it is merely a matter
of convenience.
The most popular myth involves the innocent young girl who
falls deeply in love with a boy who promises her undying love, then abandons
her when she ends of pregnant as a result of unprotected sex. She is portrayed
as an utterly innocent victim, drawn in by the boy, and when pregnant, she has
no other choice but to seek a doctor to help her chop the kid to pieces.
Advocates claim this poor unfortunate girl is humiliated by
pro-life people as she rushes into the clinic to get the dee done. In every
telling, this girl is always the victim and the boy the culprit or some other
version where she is a woman of colors, raised in a poor family without father,
sometimes raised by an elderly grandmother, leaving her few or no resources to
raise the child if allowed to be born.
Yet no matter how pro-abortion advocates paint this girl,
she is still a victim of her own choices, engaged in an act of sex for which
she is partly responsible.
Being a single mother is difficult as I well know, since my
mother dragged me everywhere with her when I was young, struggling through low
paying jobs to feed and cloth me. My ex-wife suffered a similar fate after she
fled west and had to fend for herself and our child – as have many brave women
who have resisted the easy way out, choosing to raise their kids rather than
kill them. But we have raised a society of cowards, who take pleasure in the
sexual act, but no responsibility for its outcome, who would rather murder
their off spring rather than raise them, many leaving a trail of body parts
behind them as if from war.
One of the hardest moments in my life came when my daughter
asked me to pay for her abortion, even though her boyfriend wanted to marry her,
and her mother wanted to adopt her child if allowed to be born.
I keep thinking of the doctors who engage in these mass
murders, violating their oath to save lives by taking lives instead, doctors
who live in fancy houses behind a façade of righteousness, who kill and kill
but never get punished, upstanding moral citizens with blood dripping from
their fingers, deluding themselves and us into believing they are doing
something to help humanity.
I still divert my gaze when I walk past that house in
Paterson, even though the doctor who lived in it is long gone, the vicious
memory of what he did inside that place still haunting me as it did my mother.
I divert my gaze going passed Planned Parenthood as well where mass murder is
performed with such efficiency, Nazis would envy them, mass murder without
shame or remorse.
Cassidy Hutchingson’s fame is fading rapidly now that a lot
of what she claimed in testimony before the Jan. 6 committee turns out to be
untrue.
This is also Liz Cheney’s heyday, doing her best to come up
with some scandal to tarnish Trump before voters in her state throw her the
hell out of office.
It is amazing just how much the Jan. 6 Committee resembles
the Kavanaugh confirmation hearing. Just when the committee starts looking even
stupider than usual, Liz finds them a secret witness/
Unfortunately, the witness turns out to be a fraud, filled
with hearsay evidence, some of which she actually didn’t hear from anyone, claiming
to have written memos she didn’t right, repeating stories that turned out to be
complete fabricated.
You have to wonder if Cheney helped write this script for
her.
Media, of course, repeats every lie as if gospel, and this
feeds the liberal frenzy who repeat the claims even after they have been debunked.
But you have to feel sorry for Hutchingson – who was largely
a nobody in the belt way, and so jumped at her chance to make a name for
herself, allowing the Democrats and GOP RINOs to use and abuse her, power brokers who will abandon her when her
testimony becomes too inconvenient, when it becomes clear nearly all of her testimony
is a lie.
You have to wonder what she was thinking when Cheney and the
others seduced her into testifying – and how careless Cheney was in not
checking the facts before letting this poor woman take the stand.
You can’t completely blame Hutchingson since she was so
unimportant before this, better at getting coffee for her boss than actually
doing anything productive. And so, with Cheney whispering in her ear about how
important she will be, Hutchingson fell for it.
Her once bright future has gone up in smoke – even among the
liberal loonies who repeat her lies. Everybody will eventually realize how much
damage her testimony has done to an already pathetic committee, and to Cheney
herself, who looks like an utter fool for dragging out such an unreliable
witness.
Hutchingson won’t likely find a job anywhere with anyone who
will ever trust her – partly because she turned on her own bosses, and you do
that once, future bosses will suspect you will do it again.
Cheney and company will simply throw the poor woman to the
wolves.
