Friday, September 28, 2018
Ford is either lying or has serious emotional
problems, something GOP legislators are too scared to raise in a public forum.
Although her testimony was emotional, it was
also full of holes, which the GOP’s attorney perhaps deliberately chose not to
explore – having served as a prosecutor on the other side for decades.
First of all, Ford’s story has changed over
the years. She can’t remember the location of the alleged attack, but gave testimony
describing every other detail inside the room, including supposedly those who
were in the room with her – although even this account changed with each
report.
She and her lawyer have yet to turn over the actual lie detector results to the committee. And as it turns out, the memories she claims to have of the incident were suppressed memories obtained through hypnosis and absolutely inadmissible” in the court of law in many states, including New York and Maryland.
Not only could Ford not name the month in 1982 in which the supposed attack occurred, she gave conflicting reports of the number of men involved. At one point, she claimed two boys were in the room. She told her therapist in 2012 (when she first mentioned the attack – later telling two friends in 2014 and 2015, but not her husband) that four boys were in the room.
She and her lawyer have yet to turn over the actual lie detector results to the committee. And as it turns out, the memories she claims to have of the incident were suppressed memories obtained through hypnosis and absolutely inadmissible” in the court of law in many states, including New York and Maryland.
Not only could Ford not name the month in 1982 in which the supposed attack occurred, she gave conflicting reports of the number of men involved. At one point, she claimed two boys were in the room. She told her therapist in 2012 (when she first mentioned the attack – later telling two friends in 2014 and 2015, but not her husband) that four boys were in the room.
Ford testified that the memories of the alleged rape and Kavanaugh came up in counseling in 2012 after she and her husband argued over the need for a second front door to their home. She claimed the alleged rape attempt made her feel claustrophobic. the fact that the husband and wife had to seek counseling to resolve this suggests that Ford was having emotional issues. But more importantly, a published report said a check on when building permits were taken out on the project show this occurred in 2008 not 2012.
The Washington Post, attempting to do damage control for the Democrats, claims this was simply confusion between Ford and her therapist. Ford apparently claimed there were five people at the party including herself.
The Washington Post, attempting to do damage control for the Democrats, claims this was simply confusion between Ford and her therapist. Ford apparently claimed there were five people at the party including herself.
She named names of three of the four boys,
but the fourth person turned out to be a girl, later a Democrat and a long-time
friend of Ford’s, denied any such party ever took place. This is consistent with
the three boys Ford named.
Ford, who has been very active in pro-abortion
and anti-Trump events sent a letter to Feinstein, but asking the information be
kept private.
According to one published account, Ford is the daughter of a CIA and an employee of Fienstein's husband, Richard Blum -- so Feinstein didn't have to look far to find someone to testify against Kavanaugh.
Although Feinstein claims she didn’t leak the letter to The New Yorker, with whom she has had past ties, the New Yorker went public with a vengeance.
According to one published account, Ford is the daughter of a CIA and an employee of Fienstein's husband, Richard Blum -- so Feinstein didn't have to look far to find someone to testify against Kavanaugh.
Although Feinstein claims she didn’t leak the letter to The New Yorker, with whom she has had past ties, the New Yorker went public with a vengeance.
While pro-Ford followers mock the senators
for asking who paid for the lie detector test Ford took in July, it is relevant
because some claim it was paid for by George Soros, a notorious Democratic
political boss, who reportedly also paid for Ford’s attorney, Debra Katz who donated
to Democratic campaigned but also is associated with anti-Trump groups. Katz
called Trump supporters “Miscreants,” but at the same time defended Bill
Clinton’s sexual harassment of Paul Jones in the 1990s.
Ford also said she had been asked scores of questions on the lie detector test, when it turns out, she was only asked two.
Ford also said she had been asked scores of questions on the lie detector test, when it turns out, she was only asked two.
More importantly, several news organizations
who are investigating Ford, noted that her brother once represented a company
known for Democratic dirty tricks, including those with faked forensic analysis
in defense of Planned Parenthood.”
While the Washington Post has claimed otherwise,
there is some evidence suggesting that Kavanaugh’s mother presided over the
foreclosure of a home Ford’s parents owned.
Ford also told the senate committee that fear of flying had prevented her for testifying sooner -- thus as Kavanaugh pointed out delayed the hearing and allowed Democrats more time to seek out other so called accusers. Ford and her close friends claimed she disliked being in enclosed spaces for extended periods of time -- something she claimed as a result of the rape attempt in high school.
Ford, during testimony, called herself a research pychologist at the Stanford School of Medicine. But a published account said a search through the Department of Consumer Affairs License Bureau
found no record.
NPR -- doing its usual damage control for the Democrats said California law allows the title "doctor" for a narrow group of medical and dental professionals.
So in calling herself doctor, Ford could have been in violation of California law, and this equates to a false statement made under oath.
So in testimony, she called herself "a professor" at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine.
Unfortunately, even calling herself a “psychologist” may violate state laws since such a person must be licensed by the California Board of Psychology.
Published accounts claim, Ford is not licensed in the state of California and there is no record under the Department of Consumer Affairs License Bureau to show she ever was.
Democrats apparently were concerned over Ford’s lack of credibility and so desperately sought out other alleged victims that could build a case against Kavanaugh.
Ford also told the senate committee that fear of flying had prevented her for testifying sooner -- thus as Kavanaugh pointed out delayed the hearing and allowed Democrats more time to seek out other so called accusers. Ford and her close friends claimed she disliked being in enclosed spaces for extended periods of time -- something she claimed as a result of the rape attempt in high school.
Ford, during testimony, called herself a research pychologist at the Stanford School of Medicine. But a published account said a search through the Department of Consumer Affairs License Bureau
found no record.
NPR -- doing its usual damage control for the Democrats said California law allows the title "doctor" for a narrow group of medical and dental professionals.
So in calling herself doctor, Ford could have been in violation of California law, and this equates to a false statement made under oath.
So in testimony, she called herself "a professor" at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine.
Unfortunately, even calling herself a “psychologist” may violate state laws since such a person must be licensed by the California Board of Psychology.
Published accounts claim, Ford is not licensed in the state of California and there is no record under the Department of Consumer Affairs License Bureau to show she ever was.
Democrats apparently were concerned over Ford’s lack of credibility and so desperately sought out other alleged victims that could build a case against Kavanaugh.
The ever-helpful New Yorker was more than
happy to oblige and came up Deborah Ramirez, who went to Yale with him. She
claimed he exposed himself to her at a college party in 1984. She later told another friend that she could
not be sure it was Kavanaugh at all.
The New York Times investigated and found the
claims so unsubstantial it refused to report the story. But this didn’t stop The
New Yorker which, however, failed to report that Ramirez had received a 2003
scholarship from – yes, political boss, George Soros.
Ramirez's accusation that Kavanaugh allegedly thrust his penis in her face at a dorm party, could not be supported by Liz Swisher, her college roommate. Swisher said Kavanaugh drank heavily, but she never saw him do anything sexually aggressive.
A third witness, Julie Swetnick, produced by a slimy attorney Avenatti, was so unreliable, nobody – not even the Democrats took, her seriously – except for Feinstein who appears will use anything no matter how unreliable against Kavanaugh.
Ramirez's accusation that Kavanaugh allegedly thrust his penis in her face at a dorm party, could not be supported by Liz Swisher, her college roommate. Swisher said Kavanaugh drank heavily, but she never saw him do anything sexually aggressive.
A third witness, Julie Swetnick, produced by a slimy attorney Avenatti, was so unreliable, nobody – not even the Democrats took, her seriously – except for Feinstein who appears will use anything no matter how unreliable against Kavanaugh.
Swetnick claimed that she saw Kavanaugh and his best friend at parties where they engaged in gang bangs and that she was a victim of one of these. The fact that Swetnick continued to attend parties in which this alleged behavior was going on is suspect enough, but the details read more like a scene from one of Stormy Daniels porn movies than any reality.
There is
good reason for Democrats to worry since published reports claim the third witness’s Florida boyfriend
took out a restraining order against her.
In addition, reports now show that a company she worked for filed a suit against her in 2000 for "unwelcome, sexually offensive conduct." The company's human resource department apparently came up with two male witnesses against her. Swetnick has denied these charges and in fact apparently accused the two males of sexual harassment, the company apparently decided had no merit. She eventually withdrew her charges against the men.
The company also alleged that she had lied about graduating from John Hopkins University.
She was allowed to take a leave of absence on medical issues.
In March 2001, Swetnick's boyfriend, filed a restraining order against her, claiming she had threatened him.
There were several anonymous statements sent to Feinstein making an assortment of claims. But one was recently refuted in a letter by Dabney Friedrich, who dated Judge Kavanaugh in 1998
She denied that Kavanaugh ever shoved her against a wall and one of these anti-Kavanaugh hidden attackers claimed. she called the allegation "offensive and absurd."
Another man accused Kavanauh of sexually assaulting a woman in Rhode Island. After the claim was made public, the man who made it recanted his story. He is being investigated by the FBI and can be charged.
The fact that Feinstein and her henchmen are relying on these characters to support Ford’s claims shows how desperate they are, and why the Democrats likely discouraged the other witnesses from coming before the senate committee.
She was allowed to take a leave of absence on medical issues.
In March 2001, Swetnick's boyfriend, filed a restraining order against her, claiming she had threatened him.
There were several anonymous statements sent to Feinstein making an assortment of claims. But one was recently refuted in a letter by Dabney Friedrich, who dated Judge Kavanaugh in 1998
She denied that Kavanaugh ever shoved her against a wall and one of these anti-Kavanaugh hidden attackers claimed. she called the allegation "offensive and absurd."
Another man accused Kavanauh of sexually assaulting a woman in Rhode Island. After the claim was made public, the man who made it recanted his story. He is being investigated by the FBI and can be charged.
The fact that Feinstein and her henchmen are relying on these characters to support Ford’s claims shows how desperate they are, and why the Democrats likely discouraged the other witnesses from coming before the senate committee.
While Ford’s emotional testimony seemed to
play out well until you actually study the facts, the other two are so unbelievable,
they would have actually damaged Ford’s case – even though she clearly is not
believable.
Long after Kavanaugh was confirmed by a razor-thin majority, the Senate Judiciary Committee released a report which was largely ignored by major media.
The committee interviewed a man who believes he was the man involved in Ford in high school, not Kavanaugh.
Ford claimed Kavanaugh tried to remove her clothing during the party but could not because she wore a bathinsuit, and she managed to escape the rape when Kavanaugh's friend, Mark Judge jumped on top of them.
While Ford said she was 100 percent positive it was Kavanaugh, the man interviewed said he was kissing her when a friend, not Judge jumped on them as a joke, and that the making out session with Ford was consentitual.
Ford tried to get her high school friend to collaborate her account against Kavanaugh. But her friend at first did not, then Monica McLean, a former FBI employee apparently tried to her this woman go change her story to help Ford.
The report also disputed other claims against Kavanaugh, including one witness -- supplied by The New Yorker magazine -- who said Kavanaugh had a reputation for exposing himself in college party.
It turns out this was another man entirely, a fact that The New Yorker apparently was aware of when it published its account.
The committee interviewed a man who believes he was the man involved in Ford in high school, not Kavanaugh.
Ford claimed Kavanaugh tried to remove her clothing during the party but could not because she wore a bathinsuit, and she managed to escape the rape when Kavanaugh's friend, Mark Judge jumped on top of them.
While Ford said she was 100 percent positive it was Kavanaugh, the man interviewed said he was kissing her when a friend, not Judge jumped on them as a joke, and that the making out session with Ford was consentitual.
Ford tried to get her high school friend to collaborate her account against Kavanaugh. But her friend at first did not, then Monica McLean, a former FBI employee apparently tried to her this woman go change her story to help Ford.
The report also disputed other claims against Kavanaugh, including one witness -- supplied by The New Yorker magazine -- who said Kavanaugh had a reputation for exposing himself in college party.
It turns out this was another man entirely, a fact that The New Yorker apparently was aware of when it published its account.
No comments:
Post a Comment