Monday, September 24, 2018

Avenatti and his pack of stooges






Monday, September 24, 2018

Democrats sink to new lows with the Kavanaugh smear.
Every time I hear Michael Avenatti talk, I have to reach for the hand sanitizer, even though I know you can’t catch something just from listening to a shyster talk.
This is a man who gives ambulance chasing a bad name and so it becomes even more ludicrous to realize that is primary client is an over priced prostitute, and that he makes her living pimping out.
So, hear him rant about how many women he can produce when it comes to smearing Kavanaugh, I have to clean out my ear wax to make sure I actually heard him correctly.
If the politics wasn’t so serious, I would rate Avenatti slightly above a Saturday Night Live skit, more tragic than funny, the way a falling down comic routine is funny and sad.
But the real sadness is that liberals are taking Avenatti seriously, a matter of convenience, because MeToo would much rather trust slime balls than legitimate people, especially when it comes to smearing someone to get what they want.
Avenatti enters stage left because the two women who have tried to smear Kavanaugh are so utterly unbelievable – an orchestrated attack by Democrats like Feinstein and fed through her favorite prostitute of a news organization, The New Yorker.
As it turned out, the third witness recanted her claims even before the vote was taken, something Democrats, Feinstein and The New Yorker knew about, but kept silent over in order to continue to feed this hateful myth some still believe as true. 
I guess people are just too stupid to realize that The New Yorker is a glorified rag, a fanzine for the urban intellectual who love cartoons that make no sense and stories that use big words they have to look up – breaking these stories because nobody actually sees the magazine as remotely objective. The fact is even the most slanted other news media won’t break the story as suspect as this, but will let The New Yorker do it, and then quote it the way slanted CNN is always quoting The Washington Post.
But Avenatti? Really?
We’re not even talking tabloid journalism when it comes to him. He’s the mouth that roar, emitting all kinds of steam, but little brain.
So that he winds up with clients like Stormy Daniels, who made her living on her back until she figured out she could make more through black mail.
And now, she published a book that is likely to get reviewed in The New Yorker which will have to make up the big words she’s too stupid to look up for herself.
The fact that so many women are so desperate to destroy Kavanaugh as to align themselves with Daniels and Avenatti is testimony to the lack of intelligence so called education, upwardly mobile women seem to possess.
You have two women from two parts of Kavanaugh’s life coming forward to claim that he sexually abused them, women who have strong connection to anti-Trump movements, who want more than anything to keep him from the court and are willing to prostitute themselves in much the same way Daniels has to accomplish it.
MeToo has always been questionable, a kind of vigilantism designed to circumvent the legal process to convict people who may not have done anything but are crucified in headlines by a more than willing media.
Why do so many people believe these two women and allow themselves to be aligned with people like Avenatti, whose sole motive is to make as much money for his client and made as many headlines to bolster his career?
When a woman claims a man raped her, she is putting herself on the line, making a claim that ruins a life forever. If she is lying, then she is destroying other women who really have been raped. While we would expect any sort of twisted fact to come out of Avenatti’s forked tongue, but Ford and her latest accomplice are doing a disservice to women who really have been raped. It’s sad, pathetic, and they come off as bad overall as Daniel’s does, only not nearly as honest as she is. We know what her motives are. We know that she will say and do anything to get what she wants. But with the two witnesses, we assume they have some shred of decency – but they don’t.





No comments:

Post a Comment