Jimmy Kimmel as terminator

 Jimmy Kimmel is back like a scene from a bad horror movie in which you can't drive a stake deep enough into the heart to end the movie and so you have to put up with the monster resurrecting itself again and again and again

We all hoped that this man would be contrite but that would not be Jimmy Kimmel iwhose whole life is determined to be a monster at heart someone who is so deeply mean-spirited that he can't find any sympathy for him in any respect and so have to put up with him as being the horror that he really is 

You know all those scenes from the original Terminator in which no matter what you do to save yourself this beast keeps coming after you and it is such a relentless attack that you begin to understand just why people have come to secretly hate this man and fear him because they don't want him turning on them 

Even Jay Leno who was totally screwed over by Kimmel says positive things to avoid being the target of this monster's wrath 

Unlike Hollywood movie however Disney which is almost as monstrous as he is is willing to reinstate him maybe because like the fictional computer network they secretly want him to succeed in their effort to take over and control the world 

Like Terminator there's something inhuman about kimmell something that doesn't have a heart or a soul but just this killer instinct that keeps him coming and coming and nothing will stop him short of a nuclear blast 

In the end of course in a real movie the good guys win but this is not a good guy movie and this is the villain bit in which the villain wins after all 

So don't expect Terminator Kimmel to step off the stage anytime soon he's been reinvigorated has a new computer part in his little brain that tells him that he can keep on doing nasty and despicable things and he will always have the approval of somebody in management who will want to make money over morality 

But don't worry kimmel is a self-destructing little robot and what he does now will be even worse than what he did before because he can't help himself he's programmed to be a mean spirited evil little SOB

King Charles doesn’t care

  

The United Kingdon and Canada decided to recognize the non-existent nation of Palestine, or at least some version they have created in their collective minds.

They may be suffering from collective guilt since they were the same nations that helped create Palestine in the first place, only back then, after the conclusion of World War I, Palestine was a Jewish state, created out of the ruins of Ottoman Empire. Later, when the Arabs sided with the Nazis to help exterminate the Jews in the 1930s and 1940s, it was the United Kingdom that led the charge to create modern day Israel – which is nothing more than renamed Palestine.

The West Bank, the Golen Heights and Gaza – out of which the United Kingdom intends to create the new and artificial Palestine – actually belonged to Syria, Jordan and Egypt, until those countries waged war against Israel, and Israel won. Isreal kept trying to give Gaza back to the Arabs, but every time, it became a launching pad for attacks on Israel – the October 7 event the last in a long series of outrages.

UK and Canada seem to have fallen prey to a corrupt United Nations, whose reports of events in Gaza are so full of factual error you can’t trust them (nearly all of it Hamas propaganda.

This idea of fact verse fiction has never stopped the English from acting.

Hitler was right when he believed the United Kingdom had more in common with the Nazis than it appeared on the surface, a fact that is only now becoming clear with this latest attempt to undo the history UK created in the first place.

This is not to say King Charles is stupid or even misinformed. But English royalty was always a more than little bit arrogant (after all, UK invented the whole concept of white supremacy, which may be why they are bending over backwards to appease terrorists – in much the same way Chamberland did the Nazis.

While ignorant kids on college campuses in our neck of woods might be deluded into believing the phony reports of starvation in Gaza (Hamas hijacking food shipments may well but true), but King Charles clearly knows better and is still steering his country into a new Holocaust against the Jews.

In this, you have to wonder what the English hope to gain, when they are knowingly acting to create a state that has no right to exist, at the expense of a state (Israel) that the UK helped create in the first place.

Is this the UK version of white guilt? Does King Charles feel responsible for the hatch job the British did after World War I when they ignored tribal lines to create phony states and almost guaranteed bloodshed?

Or does King Charles – like his ancient predecessor King George – think he has the right to dictate the fate of nations, when he can’t even dictate the fate of his own pathetic Royal family?

We already know that Canada is UK’s lapdog, a socialist state that follows behind whatever gets said in the UK, with an almost brainless prime minister, who hate America (at least the America that has emerged under Trump)

Still King Charles must know what’s really going on in the middle east and has decided to act as if doesn’t, dragging Canada into the mix.

What does King Charles gain by siding with terrorists? Does he really think peace will come as a result of giving terrorists even more land to attack Israel from? Is King Charles so ignorant of history as to ignore all those other attempts by Arabs to kill Jews?

My guess is King Charles doesn’t care.

 

email to Al Sullivan

Kimmel to do reboot of the Three Stooges

 

Insider reports claim that Jimmy Kimmel – who has been axed from his late night show thanks to his utterly insensitive remarks concerning the death of Charlie Kirk – is in negotiation to get reinstated.

Not only that, this contract could possibly reemploy Steven Colbert and Fallon, even nutty Seth Meyers in a reboot of some Three Stooges classics.

The network was concerned as to whether Kimmel play the role of Moe, and was he sadistic enough to physically abuse him fellow comedians the way he has verbally abused anyone associated with the Republican Party.

But a review of his previous shows demonstrated Kimmel far exceeded the other two comedians in this regard.

Colbert apparently objected to giving the role of Moe to Kimmel and suggested they toss a coin, until someone pointed out that there are three comedians and a coin only has two sides.

Jon Stewart, never one to miss an opportunity to get attention, agreed to play the role of Shemp, if the network wished to have the program include four stooges and not just three, though network officials seemed to think Stewart lacked talent to play the role of any stooge. Most experts agree – with the exception of Jay Leno, who seems to be kissing the others’ asses – none of the four have been funny in the past, and hope that by beating the crap out of each other, they will gets some chuckles from members of the GOP, who would clearly find that entertaining.

Just to be on the safe side, network officials are expected to bring back the old Vaudeville hook, to drag one or more of the trio if and when they go off script and start ranting and raving about Charlie Kirk again, an unlikely scenario considering how contrite Kimmel became after savaging Kirk the first time.

Still, these three (or four if you count Stewart) are perfectly capable of screwing up a good thing, always desperate to make some kind of political statement rather than actually being funny. Despite their rise to power on late night TV, none of these people have talent or ethics to make their political diarrhea sound funny, unlike Charlie Chaplin, in whose shadow none of these three can compare.

Rumors or not, would any network dare to take a chance with these mental giants? Can they be trusted to do slapstick after so many years of lame political jokes.

Of course, there remains the question of how the heirs of the original Three Stooges might feel seeing such pathetic characters parodying the really great comic acts of the past. They could sue to keep the network from allowing such low-life characters like these to play those roles.

If things don’t work out for Kimmel and company, he and they might take up a profession they are truly adept at: Trash collection. After all these year dolling out the crap they call comedy, those three certainly would know what trash sounds like.

 

email to Al Sullivan

Jon Stewart lost his pacifier

 

Jon Stewart is pissed off that nobody has told him to shut up.

So, like a petulant little brat, he’s having a tantrum, telling the world he won’t shut up, on the off chance anyone thinks he’s important enough to bother with.

Steward is clearly upset that other comedians are banned from airwaves for saying stupid things, and so Stewart needs to say stupid things to keep up with them.

He’s the spoil brat at kids’ birthday party that needs to act out in order to get attention, the way he did several years ago when he launched a phony crusade for veterans nobody has heard of since.

In order to get in on the show, this week Stewart came out with a statement saying he would not be censored

Nobody tried to but he felt so ignored by The in crowd that he decided he was going to hold a temper tantrum anyway

This is a kid who obviously when an infant kept having a pacifier shoved in his mouth to keep the crap from coming out

These days, however, he hasn't made any headlines, so he had to make some headlines for himself

The fact is we're better off hearing what comes out of his mouth since it is almost verbatim of some democratic think tank in which has paid his salary for years

But be cautious when it comes to Stewart he will go out of his way to spoil the party unless he’s the center of attention.

You can't hold it against him since he was among the least funny of all of the late-night comedians. He’s a gnat in a world of dinosaurs.

Unfortunately, he's too big to spank

email to Al Sullivan

Kimmel went too far this time

  

Jimmy Kimmel is not stupid; but he thinks his audience is.

Or perhaps, the problem goes far deeper than just stupidity, an arrogance that is extremely Orwellian.

He is so used to manipulating people for so long, selling them false narratives that when it comes to alleged shooter of Charlie Kirk, Kimmel actually believed he could convince the public that black is white – even though the preponderance of evidence showed that the person charged with the crime was deeply involved with the trans community and had distinct left wing leanings.

Kimmel was determined to reshape this character into a Maga stooge, then the alleged killer was a woke stooge instead.

Kimmel has been selling the false woke agenda for so long, he couldn’t possibly stand the idea that someone associated with his political opinion would shoot someone, and so needed to convince the public otherwise.

It’s hard to tell if Kimmel is deluded or this was a deliberate attempt to do what Orwell said all oppressive regimes engage in, misinformation, even when the public has access to the truth.

Kimmel seems to believe he had some magical power to convince people not to believe their own eyes, and rely on him for truth. Stalin would have loved Kimmel, only Kimmel proved too inept to make it work.

But it shows just how indoctrinated in his own woke philosophy Kimmel has become.

A normal person would have painted the would-be killer as just another whacko and moved on, but Kimmel became obsessed with proving things otherwise, and foolishly believed in his god-like ability to dictate a lie as truth.

This has massive implications for the agenda he and others in media have been selling since before Trump’s first term began. If Kimmel lied about this, you have to question what else he and others in media have been lying about – most likely everything, and this threatens to unravel as well orchestrated media campaign against Trump and the GOP, and may well open the eyes of many people who have up to this point taken Kimmel’s misinformation as gospel.

Kimmel can’t help himself. His rage against the GOP won’t allow him to stop and his personal belief that people will accept whatever he says as truth will prevent him from ever coming to grips with his anti-trump disease.

Disney, which is no friend of Trump or the GOP, realized how dangerous Kimmel was to the anti-trump movement and yanked Kimmel off the air before he could do any more damage, not out of any sense of shame for Kimmel having danced on Kirk’s grave.

 

email to Al Sullivan

Banning Christians

  

It is very difficult to tell what the motivation is Abdullah H. Hammoud is in his recent banning of a Christian from his meeting.

It is possible that Hammoud is auditioning to become the new world leader of Hamas and can’t tell the difference between a Christian and Jew.

Or Hammoud may be aching for the glory days of Islam when the Christian Crusades unraveled in the Middle East many long centuries ago.

But clearly the mayor the mayor forgot which country he is elected to and forgets that tolerating descent is what he gets paid for, to listen to his constituents whether he likes them or not.

 To be fair to the Muslim mayor it could be worse he could actually be in Gaza working against the Jews and Christians there

In the United States, there are certain constraints although when you look at what happened to Charlie Kirk, you begin to think maybe mayors like Hammoud would do away with them in order to silence people who have opinions other than their own.

You have to love a country in which people of all faiths can embrace each other in civility, although it may not be wise to allow the mayor access to a rifle of any kind or for that matter, anything thing sharp like an Arabian sword.

Hammoud, however, has decided he is the arbiter of right and wrong, good and evil and is decided that this Christian doesn't deserve to have a voice in his community, thus exposing his own prejudices when it comes to opinions spouted by Christian and Jews – not a bit leap from Nazi Germany which also denied these people a voice.

The worst part is that Hammoud is likely to get reelected since he seems to reflect ill feelings by many of his constituents, who wish not to tolerate people seen as inferior.

Does Hammoud’s dictate go beyond just public meetings, but all of the community events? Will the mayor set up separate bathrooms for Christians and water fountains and will he make Christians sit on the back of buses.

Will Hammoud ban Christians and maybe jews from local lunch counters?

And what other rights will this good mayor curtail in order to uphold his position of power This is not to say he should tolerate misbehavior at the council meetings but certainly he gets paid to hear the complaints and obviously doesn't want to hear it from anybody other than his own group of narrow-minded people

At the end of the day, we are seeing these Petty dictators popping up all over the country, little tyrants who have forgotten why they came to the United States in the first place and what freedom means in regard to other people besides themselves.

Someone needs to wake Hammoud up and remind him where he is or buy him a one-way ticket to Gaza where his kind of behavior is tolerated.

email to Al Sullivan

UnAmerican activities as defined by Jason Crow

 

 Jason Crow, a congressman from the super woke state of Colorado, said it is unAmerican to punish people for cheering on the murder of Charlie Kirk.

This clearly influential Democrat makes a sound case for people who believe killing someone who we disagree with is legitimate.

Crow, no doubt, would not be bothered if people back in June 2020 cheered on the equally horrendous murder of George Floyd. Of course, using this logic, Crow obviously believes that people should not be punished for showing support for the murder of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., John F. Kennedy or his brother, Robert Kennedy.

In this regard, Crow should be crafting legislation to help protect all murderers from unreasonable criticism by anyone, and no doubt, Crow would generously support killers of any kind, killing anyone, as long as those people being murdered happened to be people he personally disagrees with politically.

This may explain why Crow and his democratic cronies do their utmost to make sure criminals get released back on the street, giving them a second chance to repeat their crimes.

Crow most likely would approve of those who cheer on criminals during street crimes. How dare anyone prevent these good citizens from exerting their constitutional right of free speech, even when this means supporting murderers.

Nobody should ever be punished – as long as the victim of the crime is someone Crow disapproves of.

Did we hear peep from Crow when mean spirited people claimed Floyd deserved to die?

Would Crow have protected nasty people who supported Oswald or any of the classic killers of the 1960s.

Crow thinks it’s a person’s right to support such killers.

If only Crow was consistent in his praise of those who praise murder, and would support all the people who cheer on mass murderers. But it is clear, Crow is only supporting those who cheer on the murder of a conservative. But it would clearly be a different case if Crow heard someone cheering on the murder of Floyd.

But it if is unAmerican to punish those who support the murder of Kirk, then it is unAmerican for anyone who supported the murder of MLK.

Is that really what Crow is telling us?

email to Al Sullivan

Selling Freddy's soul

 

You have to admire just how great and Noble a tradition ministers have been playing in local politics.

Unfortunately, these are people who seek to model themselves after Dr. Martin Luther King, yet for some reason can’t quite get the knack.

Many claim to be holy, and yet somehow took a misstep in their path to personal enlightenment, and seem to be reliving the age of Crusades, full of fire and brimstone, that makes them sound drunk rather than religious.

One local minister took it on herself to go to the deep south to help pull down statues of confederate soldiers, an obvious cause inspired by God, only when she got there she managed to aggravate people she mislabeled as white supremacists, and returned home like a war hero claiming she slay them with her mighty spear.

Most of her kind (she happens to be a white liberal) wouldn’t know a white supremist if one fell on her head, but that doesn’t stop her since she is clearly being guided by God.

Another minister forced her way into a pride event in the town where she grew up and shouted loud enough with the hopes her conventionally religious mother might hear her, and I’m still trying to find out what part of scripture she got this bit of revenge from.

Down south in Texas, we have Rev. Freddy, who is responsible for one of the worst and most racist congress people on earth (if you believe a black woman who hates white people can be considered racists).

Freddy has it in his head he is a reincarnation of MLK and is particularly enraged when people compare the white conservative Charlie Kirk to MLK instead.

Freddy doesn’t say it out right but clearly thinks Kirk – who is white – is the wrong color, so keeps calling Kirk “a fake Christian.”

Obviously, Freddy missed the part of MLK’s speeches that talked about the quality of character rather than color of skin.

Freddy has decided he’s taken up the role of God and can look into Kirk’s soul, passing judgement on a man, whose speeches have aroused support even among those who oppose Kirk politically.

Freddy doesn’t have that problem. Every time he spouts his crap, he largely alienates people he has been commanded by God to save, obviously believing people with black skins are more worthy than people with white skins, and so rants and raves until he turns blue in the face.

If only MLK was alive to hear him, but then MLK might have more in common than Freddy does, lacking the basic requirement to become a minister these days: hate of white people.

This is a scary thought for anyone approaching the pearly gates and finding someone like Freddy waiting with a paint chart from Shermin Williams to determine if the soul is dark enough to qualify for admittance to heaven.

But rest assured, this won’t be a problem. If Freddy is the guard of any gate it will be the gates of hell, a job for which he is best suited.

I’m not saying that had Freddy been invited to the last supper Christ would have to worry about Freddy getting his share of the pieces of silver, but it is clear that while Freddy claims to be modeling his life after Christ, he may have missed a few chapters in the good book and mistaken the role of serpent instead, perhaps thinking Adam and Eve were just too damned white to be enjoying Eden.

Don’t mistake me. Freddy doesn’t mean to be evil, he just ends up that way, clearly forgetting his role as a good shepherd to guide souls to Christ rather than drive them the other way.

The whole idea of “forgiveness,” Freddy twists into “for blacks only,” and so condemns Kirk’s soul (after all Kirk was murdered) to eternal damnation rather than finding space in his own heart to maybe suggest Kirk as misguided.

No, instead, Freddy goes into a jealous rage against a white man who better exemplifies Christ and MLK than Freddy ever could, and maybe this is the problem.

Instead of thinking he can look into another man’s soul and believe he has the right to pass judgment, Freddy should look into his own soul and deal with the blackness there, not the good blackness of a skin color, but the color of corruption that only sympathy with the devil brings.

 

email to Al Sullivan

Hollywood stars boycott Jews

  

It appears that the movie stars that have decided to boycott Jewish movie production.

This may be a significant hardship for these actors, who get top dollar to portray imagery people.

Acting jobs may be hard to come by and many may be forced to do remakes of Nazi propaganda films

This is a practical solution since they will still be able to live up to their pro terrorist philosophies, resorting the historical period to which they are most sympathetic.

At first, it will be difficult for these antisemitic actors to perform in films that depict contemporary events. The terrorists, who these actors seem to support, may not allow them to film on location because the terrorists (who kill Jews) may not be able to rely on these movie stars remaining as deaf, dumb and blind if they actually see what is going on in the middle east, rather than relying on skewed reporting and hateful information from the United Nations.

These unfortunate movie stars, who have kept blindfolds on for so long is difficult to say how they will be able to make a living.

But at first, doing films depicting the Holocaust from a pro Nazi point of view might keep them from ever discovering the truth, while maintaining their anti Semitic status in the Woke community.

Phoenix and other major stars clearly have decided that they want to support a noble cause even if they don't quite know what that cause is

Over time, of course if the terrorists have their way, these movie stars could get better material than just that of the massive slaughter of Jews in the 1930s and 40s and may eventually do a film on October 7^th -- from the terrorist point of view, naturally,  showing how noble the terrorists are in raping murdering and kidnapping people

That unfortunately is still far down the road since they will need to get funding from some other source other than Iran and other terrorist Nations who have been spreading misinformation

Funding for such atrocious movies may be available through the United Nations which is nearly as def dumb and blind as the movie stars are

Competition for lead roles in Nazi historic films will be fierce since many of these well-meaning movie stars will want to get top billing playing the role of Adolph Hitler.

Maybe they can start their own studio where they may duplicate some of the slaughter that Hitler was responsible for

Movie stars can easily duplicate all of the upper ranking of the Nazi regime since they are sympathetic to that cause but as we move on to films about the October 7th and the increased attacks on Israel, they may have to resort to DEI to make sure that the roles are authentic and that these mostly white movie stars are not stealing roles from terrorists who may do the rules better than they can

Ultimately of course considering how corrupt the academy has become there may be a whole litany of anti-Jewish Oscars that such Stars can win for their dedication to antisemitism

You'll have to question who will present such awards and what the categories might be: best actor for playing the role of those Nazis or terrorists who kill the most Jews, and technical awards roles as lampshade makers

Such awards could be divided into historic documentation of supporting Hitler youth as opposed to the current terrorist groups that are being celebrated

But that is too far to speculative at this point

Since obviously these movie stars really Kow nothing about what's going on in the Middle East and really need to catch up on facts but as long as they rely on terrorist information sources and the United Nations they may forever be in the dark

email to Al Sullivan

Charlie Kirk as martyr September 13, 2025

 

 It becomes very obvious by the radical woke people who are bashing Charlie Kirk most either never actually listened to what he had to say or found him so convincing they have gone into deep denial, and resort to use of words like Racism or White Supremacy to counter his huge influence on previously brainwashed college students.

Kirk was never a racist or a white supremist, but with the deaf, dumb and blind supposedly educated on college campuses, this doesn’t matter.

Trying to remember, it is our best and brightest who have been molded into the Marxist doctrine where truth is what you say it is, and often during Kirk’s college campaigns, he unmasked many of his most vocal critics, sometimes even making them realize that the professors (those so call messengers of knowledge on campus) have mislead them, and perhaps are utterly convinced of their own moral superiority, they can’t come to grips with the truth when brought right into their back yard.

The fact that Kirk was a Christian also seems to offend the college establishment, including so called ministers who have been celebrating Kirk’s murder in much the way the Pharisees must have the crucifixion of Christ.

While most ministers are well-meaning, even when mistaken, there are a batch of them who are so full of hate it boils out of them with every breath, holy people who are not holy, and disguise their hatred with scripture they are completely ignorant about, often siding with those who do not believe in God over people like Kirk, who did.

Kirk’s death has exposed just how vicious a crowd the woke people have become, wannabe murders, too cowardly to perform the vicious act themselves so like Judas take their 30 pieces of silver and encourage with their lecturers more mentally unstable people to perform the act in themselves.

Mainstream media is equally guilty, broadcasting lies, and then hateful speeches that get under the skin of maniacs who then commit the act while media, college professors and others pretend they had no culpability in the violence, although some have just enough courage to claim the victim (in this case Kirk) deserved to be murdered, simply because his opinioned differed from theirs and he was extremely effective in selling it to the naïve population media and colleges previously assumed they had effectively brainwashed with wokeness.

Some institutions have back tracked, even fired teachers and broadcasters who too openly cheered on the murder. How different this was in the case of George Floyd when because of skin color, media and schools could paint into a Christ-like figure, despite his criminal record.

Kirk was white and so became an easy target for the establishment, provided the rhetoric doesn’t go so far as to put their own institutions in jeopardy or expose the truth about their false truths.

Kirk was too effective in demonstrating just how these institutions of higher learning and established media had brainwashed kids and was also effective at opening these kids’ eyes to that fact, something that made Kirk extremely dangerous.

Did the woke establishment seek to silence Kirk?  Indeed, in some school districts, clubs based on his teachings were actually banned, even though their counterparts on the left were encouraged. But to kill him outright is a fatal mistaken, just as it was when the Greeks killed Socrates and the Pharisees killed Christ. They did the worst possible thing, they made Kirk a martyr, and the more we get radical broadcasters and professors saying Kirk deserved to die, the more of a martyr Kirk becomes.

His death is symbolic, and as with Dr. Martin Luther King, shows just how horrible those forces are that are stacked against him. Of all the stupid mistakes Democrats have made (including democratic congress people shouting down any moment of silence in Kirk’s honor) the worse it all becomes. It shows just how mean spirited the Democrats really are. The curtain has been drawn open. The Wizard’s dirty tricks have been exposed. They can’t undo the truth, as hard as they might try.

email to Al Sullivan

How to be an idiot at George Washington University

 

The reason remarks by Pohorilak an assistant l administrator show how it is still possible to have a college position and still be blatantly stupid 

The unfortunate assistant May the remark that jolly Kirk largely got what he deserved because Kurt believed in guns 

The fact is that Kurt believed that people killed people and he was right whereas this idiot from George Washington University keeps missing the point 

If you are pro-gun therefore you deserve to die is what George Washington University is largely saying 

Whereas Kirk and the GOP are seeing that fanatics who own guns are going to kill people no matter what their ideolog

Banning guns isn't the answer what is the answer is curbing the rhetoric by colleges and media that inspires these wackos to go out and kill people 

But then George Washington University and other universities like it are part of an agenda setting that promotes crime and belittles victims such as Kirk 

This is not to say that all University graduates end up stupid like this administrator or death dumb and blind like most of those who are anti-kirk it just shows that for all of their college education they don't actually listen to what other people say 

And George Washington University shows just how miseducated their students are not being taught how to think or evaluate but how to be brain dead and to listen only to what they want to hear and what they are taught by radical idiots like this assistant administrator 

Of course at the end of the day something has to be done to stop these people from killing people and unfortunately the left and the universities and these other places throw up their hands and don't take responsibility for their rhetoric and so now can pretend like they are innocent of the crime when they are actually the people who caused it in the first place 

Killing Kirk was not just a tragedy it was one of the stupidest things the left could have done far worse than the George Floyd is situation which AOC keeps ranting about 

This was a legitimately intelligent human being making intelligent arguments on campuses that were having an effect of breaking down the brainwashing that universities have been doing to young people 

This is the real reason why George Washington University and this idiot assistant administrator have to dispel any kind of respect for Kirk 

To admit that he had a legitimate argument is to admit that possibly what they are teaching kids in these universities is damaging and dangerous and largely inspiring violence 

Bring us back to that old argument guns do not kill people the people who pull the triggers do and if you inspire them and if you teach them hate the way George Washington University teaches their students and you don't allow them to think and reason arguments the way this assistant clearly does not want then you're going to have a lot of idiots pulling triggers idiots unfortunately with University degrees who are still idiots and still dangerous

 

email to Al Sullivan